"That answer is really only very partly true in the sense that Marc Andressen is now a vc investor in AI companies and the Biden administration was literally de-banking AI firms with the stated remit that they wanted to control AI companies. As he explains the de banking is absolute total over reach by governments, asking private sector companies to punish businesses without having to change laws / go through due process etc. It’s back door gangsterism,
so yes, the democrats were against free trade and ability to generate wealth in tech, literally. You could say it’s simply ‘it’s the money’ but there’s much more at play in terms of upstanding the ethics of free trade and addressing government over reach."
I couldnt agree more with this, and if people take the time to watch the clip Andreessen explains how it evolved and how he knew many people debanked. The other side of the coin was even worse, individuals were labelled (PEPs, politically exposed people). Now one would think this is because of links to authoritarian regimes, in actual fact it was because they held democratic views. The story evolves to people being debanked by shady NGOs with no way of challenging it or redress. It is gangsterism.
As someone on here said, Rogan isn't the arbiter of truth and to a degree may be biased, but just exposing this helps society as a whole. You'd never hear of this on MSM on either side of the altantic, and if you did it'd be years after it happened. This is why the MSM is dying everywhere, people want the truth.
But great swathes of people, in fact the majority will never get this far. They'll just say Rogan this, Rogan that and dismiss the evidence from a tech billionaire because of the assumption it's all being said from a viewpoint of self interest.
However it's quite undeniable the above is essentially authoritarian capitalism, and if you look back in your history books you'll see this was the economic modus operandi of Nazi Germany.
In fact all the historical regimes whether it was China in the past or now, Russia, Nazi Germany, or Italiam fascism under Mussolini had a similar view of capitalism. It's necessary for economic growth and was present to some degree dependent on the regime selected, but in all these cases existed authoritarian capitalism or totalitarian capitalism. That's what the US was moving towards.
Don't get me wrong, Trump is no angel, far from it, but the other side is far worse.
I find it funny when I see polls from the UK asking about the favourability of Trump, it's irrelevant. Trump is there on a manifesto presented to the people and voted into office upon. Like it or loathe it he seems steadfastly committed to delivering on that manifesto. Contrast that with the UK where Starmer had broken dozens of manifesto commitments in his first 8 months, all in the name of wilful managed decline.
There will be a rocky start but Trump's administration will ultimately be successful for the American people and their livelihoods I have no doubt.
Meanwhile in the UK we'll persist with a government so poor, serving a globalist agenda which slowly ruins the place.