Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts proposal

1000 replies

Charliechoosecarefully · 18/03/2025 13:35

I just wanted it to have a specific thread:-

Kendall says government to consult on merging JSA and ESA benefits.

Kendall says WCA being scrapped, with Pip assessment process being used instead - will be scrapped in 2028.

Kendall says 'right to try' will let people on sickness benefits try work without immediately having benefits cut.

Kendall says UC payments being rebalanced, with standard rate going up, and some health top-ups frozen or cut.

Kendall says reassessments for people on universal credit with health top-ups to be beefed up

Kendall says universal credit claimants with most severe disabilities will not face reassessment

Kendall confirms Pip eligibility rules to be tightened, and assessment process to be reviewed - 4 pointed needed in one descriptor.

Kendall says under-22s could be prevented from claiming health top-up for universal credit

Sourced from the guardian.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 17:38

Kirbert2 · 18/03/2025 16:56

The NHS doesn't provide enough therapy and waiting lists are often incredibly long so people tend to use their money for private therapy.

My son gets DLA and the NHS provides 1 30 minute physio session every week which isn't enough for him to reach his potential so some of his DLA goes towards private physio and hydrotherapy.

These should be self funded. What about people who haven’t yet done the pip application? Do they just wallow in nhs waiting lists while you jump the queue for exactly the same need. That not a fair system.

LakieLady · 18/03/2025 17:39

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 14:23

Illegal immigrants is another issue to tackle but does not stand hand in hand with disability benefits.
They are separate and both need sorting.

And illegal immigrants aren't entitled to benefits, disability benefits or any others.

Asylum seekers aren't entitled to benefits either.

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:40

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 17:12

The triple lock is unlikely to go as pensioners have already been hit by the winter fuel allowance

Removing free bus passes for wealthy pensioners should also mean removing them for kids getting to schools including all free transport to school really. There would be a significant reduction in LA funding there.

I agree with the other poster that the triple lock is extremely likely to go. It may not go in the Spring budget but it will go.

Kids don't have free bus passes to school. It's only the pensioners (including the wealthy ones that do). This is plain wrong.

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:40

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:40

I agree with the other poster that the triple lock is extremely likely to go. It may not go in the Spring budget but it will go.

Kids don't have free bus passes to school. It's only the pensioners (including the wealthy ones that do). This is plain wrong.

Yes. It isn’t fair at all.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:41

Wildflowers99 · 18/03/2025 17:37

Yes, they seem to think because it’s a ‘moral case’ that means financial rules don’t apply, and the cash will just keep flowing in accordance to need.

It’s also bonkers that they act like the ONLY worthy source of spending is benefits, and only when spending on everything else is 0 can we look to cut benefits (and not even then probably). I can imagine them saying ‘but we spend 20 million a year on our very depleted police force, why not cut that before targeting the vulnerable?’

Would you apply that line of thinking if we were talking about cuts to child benefit, or nursery fees ? As a benefit advisor I often came across UC claimants who were claiming up to £1500 a month in childcare fees - and that was without the child benefit which can still be claimed on a single wage of £50k. That represents over twice the highest award of PIP.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:42

LakieLady · 18/03/2025 17:39

And illegal immigrants aren't entitled to benefits, disability benefits or any others.

Asylum seekers aren't entitled to benefits either.

The don’t need to be. They’re housed, fed, given pocket money, free healthcare and Wi-Fi.

Keepingittogetherstepbystep · 18/03/2025 17:42

Secretmeetings · 18/03/2025 17:35

Why the objection to vouchers (serious question)?

Because it removes the disabled person's ability to choose what's right for them and then it would turn into people just not getting the help they need or being told where to buy something from.

Lots of disabled people can think for themselves and decide what's best. They don't need some Whitehall puppet deciding that this companies better as they give us an incentive.

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:43

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:26

You need to stop blaming everyone else for your lack of ambition, hard work and lack of progress. What are you doing to improve your situation and outlook?

I agreed with you your claim that there are some people (a minority) 'playing the system' but I find this post nonsensical. It is ignorant to accuse people of lacking ambition and not working hard. The fact is that, for younger people now in the UK, hard work simply doesn't pay. Many people, especially younger people have realised this, hence their perfectly logical behaviour.

Penguinmouse · 18/03/2025 17:43

cassgate · 18/03/2025 17:33

Reading this thread with interest. Think the changes are aimed at people like this taken from a bbc article on the 16th March.

Emily, 41, from Croydon, is autistic and struggles with time management and organising basic tasks for her daily routine.
She says her autism has prevented her from getting jobs in the past as she would "umm and ahh a lot" in interviews, but is now working full-time as a flight attendant after developing strategies to help with her daily routine.
Emily receives a Personal Independence Payment (Pip) of more than £400 a month, which is not dependent on the recipient's income. But the money mostly goes on her regular bills, rather than on the occupational therapy she thinks would really help her to establish a proper routine.

This lady does not use the £400 a month Pip to help her with her difficulties but uses it to pay every day bills. Why is she getting it then if she isn’t using it to help her condition.

Read this earlier and couldn’t agree more - she doesn’t use her PIP to help her disability. This is why people who work full time and receive nothing (despite also not being shielded from the cost of living) get annoyed. I don’t agree with these cuts on the whole but I do agree with reform.

GeneHuntsCowboyBoots · 18/03/2025 17:43

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:38

Are you sniffing diesel or something ? Get a job that can be done from bed ? Jesus, now I’ve heard it all !!

Not to mention the fact that the poster that they are quoting could easily have a condition where working causes the flares. I am often bed bound at least a few days a week and on the days I’m bed bound, I often can’t even lift my head off the pillow. The days I’m not, if I try and do anything physical or cognitive, it will cause me to flare. But obviously I’m just not pushing myself enough!🙄

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:43

9fthighfence · 18/03/2025 17:38

These should be self funded. What about people who haven’t yet done the pip application? Do they just wallow in nhs waiting lists while you jump the queue for exactly the same need. That not a fair system.

When they do get the PIP award they can simply do the same thing can’t they ? Or are you telling me you wouldn’t do the same for your own family ?

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:43

Keepingittogetherstepbystep · 18/03/2025 17:42

Because it removes the disabled person's ability to choose what's right for them and then it would turn into people just not getting the help they need or being told where to buy something from.

Lots of disabled people can think for themselves and decide what's best. They don't need some Whitehall puppet deciding that this companies better as they give us an incentive.

It’s best in vouchers much more likely to be spent on the purpose ot was intended for.

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 17:43

LakieLady · 18/03/2025 17:39

And illegal immigrants aren't entitled to benefits, disability benefits or any others.

Asylum seekers aren't entitled to benefits either.

Tbf I think the pp was really referring to the cost to the taxpayer.
The fact that the money has a different title is irrelevant technically. It all still comes from the taxpayer.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:45

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:43

It’s best in vouchers much more likely to be spent on the purpose ot was intended for.

Liz Kendal laid out her reasons for not introducing vouchers. Simply put disabled people are not imbeciles and disability is not one size fits all. They are afforded the dignity and autonomy to choose how best to spend their disability benefits. Happily this is one area the government agrees on.

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:45

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:40

Yes. It isn’t fair at all.

It is indeed. My children also had to pay peak train fare to get to school early in the morning as they couldn't use their railcards at that time. The pensioners, on the other hand, were able to use their discounts.
Unfortunately, as usual, it will be current middle aged and younger generations that end up losing out the most when the triple lock goes.

TheWombatleague · 18/03/2025 17:45

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:26

You need to stop blaming everyone else for your lack of ambition, hard work and lack of progress. What are you doing to improve your situation and outlook?

What? I'm close to retiring on a healthy pension after having a fairly stellar, if short, academic career. My only ambition is to see a better future for the people of this country.

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:46

TheWombatleague · 18/03/2025 17:45

What? I'm close to retiring on a healthy pension after having a fairly stellar, if short, academic career. My only ambition is to see a better future for the people of this country.

…..

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 17:46

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:40

I agree with the other poster that the triple lock is extremely likely to go. It may not go in the Spring budget but it will go.

Kids don't have free bus passes to school. It's only the pensioners (including the wealthy ones that do). This is plain wrong.

Kids do.! This is not wrong!
If they live far from the school they get free travel.
That includes for those that chose a school further away from another if they deem it’s more suitable.

RejoiceandSing · 18/03/2025 17:47

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:43

It’s best in vouchers much more likely to be spent on the purpose ot was intended for.

yes and I'm sure the admin system would keep up with me applying to replace one aid or another every month. And all that admin would be cost free, naturally.
Come on, the voucher system was roundly debated when it was proposed. We explained all the reasons why it a) wouldn't work and b) would be degrading at the time.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:47

Penguinmouse · 18/03/2025 17:43

Read this earlier and couldn’t agree more - she doesn’t use her PIP to help her disability. This is why people who work full time and receive nothing (despite also not being shielded from the cost of living) get annoyed. I don’t agree with these cuts on the whole but I do agree with reform.

Disabled people are entitled to spend their disability benefits however they like. The clue is in the word ‘independence’. If that extra money helps her make ends meet because her disability costs money elsewhere then there’s nothing wrong with that. At all. PIP is intended to promote independence - it can be used in any way that helps the disabled person. From paying bills, to enabling them to socialise, staying mobile. I’ve heard people criticise the disabled for using some of it for TV packages, but what they don’t seem to understand is that limited mobility brings about restriction in going out and socialising. They don’t spend hundreds on eating out or the cinema but people still begrudge the small things.

LokiDoki75 · 18/03/2025 17:48

Longsummerdays25 · 18/03/2025 17:34

You could get a flexible job from home and work around your flares. Again it wouldn’t be that hard. You could even get a job that can be done from your bed. If you were so inclined. I say this as someone that has a disability.

I’m getting a little fed up with the implication from you that I’m lazy and scrounging, you have no idea what my disability is. I’ve tried to work around it, but those days I’m stuck, I can barely move my limbs. The one job I had where I could work like that, suddenly the employer decided it had to be office based 9-5 and that was that. I haven’t yet found the magic job where I can work any hours of the day or night around my illness but it isn’t for want of trying on all the job sites every day that I can. They are very few and far between and unsurprisingly have 100s of applications. I’m trying to find a way of working for myself. I’m very far from just lounging around poncing off the system!

rainingsnoring · 18/03/2025 17:48

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 17:46

Kids do.! This is not wrong!
If they live far from the school they get free travel.
That includes for those that chose a school further away from another if they deem it’s more suitable.

Edited

They don't all get that at all. If there is no school available within a set distance, perhaps. My kids went to a school that was more suitable and none of them got free travel. We paid for everything. As I said, on the early morning trains, the pensioners could use their discount cards but the school kids, who had to actually get to school, could not.

Oioisavaloy27 · 18/03/2025 17:49

cassgate · 18/03/2025 17:33

Reading this thread with interest. Think the changes are aimed at people like this taken from a bbc article on the 16th March.

Emily, 41, from Croydon, is autistic and struggles with time management and organising basic tasks for her daily routine.
She says her autism has prevented her from getting jobs in the past as she would "umm and ahh a lot" in interviews, but is now working full-time as a flight attendant after developing strategies to help with her daily routine.
Emily receives a Personal Independence Payment (Pip) of more than £400 a month, which is not dependent on the recipient's income. But the money mostly goes on her regular bills, rather than on the occupational therapy she thinks would really help her to establish a proper routine.

This lady does not use the £400 a month Pip to help her with her difficulties but uses it to pay every day bills. Why is she getting it then if she isn’t using it to help her condition.

See surely she is not entitled to pip now then? She obviously does not need it.

I know of a lady who claimed.pio because she was bullied at school she's in her 30's and never worked a day in her life. She also claims.for all her 4 children.

Bumpitybumper · 18/03/2025 17:49

Rosscameasdoody · 18/03/2025 17:47

Disabled people are entitled to spend their disability benefits however they like. The clue is in the word ‘independence’. If that extra money helps her make ends meet because her disability costs money elsewhere then there’s nothing wrong with that. At all. PIP is intended to promote independence - it can be used in any way that helps the disabled person. From paying bills, to enabling them to socialise, staying mobile. I’ve heard people criticise the disabled for using some of it for TV packages, but what they don’t seem to understand is that limited mobility brings about restriction in going out and socialising. They don’t spend hundreds on eating out or the cinema but people still begrudge the small things.

Edited

Of course you are right that she is entitled to do this under the current rules. It is hardly surprising though that stories like this evoke huge questions about whether this is something that the state should be funded. This is why reform and cuts can be made with some public support. A large proportion of the population don't think this is a good use of tax payers money. Ultimately in a democracy their opinion matters!

TheWombatleague · 18/03/2025 17:51

APocketFullOfRye · 18/03/2025 17:27

Billionaires are leaving though
Its not like there’s a lot that still live here anyway but as they pay a lot of tax and provide jobs the loss of even one is great
Since 2022 when numbers were at there peak of 177 we’re now down to 165.
Losing just 12 is a huge loss to the economy.

Yet our GDP per person is as high as it's ever been. It's a fallacy that billionaires create jobs anyway, demand does. If, like the USA, Australia, Sweden etc we had an exit tax, then they could all fuck off tomorrow as far as I'm concerned.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.