Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask how we stop dangerous cyclists

309 replies

Everythingisnumbersnow · 11/02/2025 17:39

Why do the most dangerous ones wear those stupid little headcams too? YOU'RE the problem, guy.

OP posts:
SpeedyMcNobhead · 11/02/2025 19:04

It’s funny, during my CBT my instructor was very clear with assume all vehicles are out to kill you…it seems a daft sentiment but actually it’s designed to make you consider how vulnerable you are on a motorbike.

If more cyclist’s had the same approach then I think it would be better, but there does seem to be an awful lot of cyclists who believe the road belongs to them and only them and everyone should make way for them.

The city I live in has spent millions putting bicycle lanes in and yet you still get the arrogant cyclists on the road-why willingly put yourself in the dangerous path when there is a safe place for you to be?

Scammersarescum · 11/02/2025 19:07

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 11/02/2025 18:12

As drivers are supposed to give cyclists as much room as a car when overtaking, cycling 2-3 abreast actually should make it easier for drivers to pass, as it makes the length of the group shorter, so requires the driver to spend less time in the oncoming lane. If you're complaining about people cycling in the middle of the lane or 2-3 abreast, then you intend to pass in a dangerous manner.

Quite. Im surprised that people are still complaining about cyclists being two abreast or in the middle of the lane. It's safer for cyclists and they are more vulnerable than car users so should be kept safe.

https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/campaigning/article/20220127-Highway-Code-%E2%80%93-Riding-two-abreast-0

Highway Code – Riding two abreast

Changes to the Highway Code have provoked plenty more discussion this week. Here, our Policy Manager Nick Chamberlin reflects on the changes for people on bikes riding ‘two abreast’.

https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/campaigning/article/20220127-Highway-Code-%E2%80%93-Riding-two-abreast-0

JenniferBooth · 11/02/2025 19:08

worrisomeasset · 11/02/2025 18:53

The lesson is for the police to do their bloody job and confiscate these modified bikes on the grounds that they are illegal on public roads and cycle paths. The police here recently had one well-publicised day in which they confiscated some of these bikes, but it was only for one day and doesn’t seem to have deterred the riders of illegal bikes. It needs some sustained action.

On Anglia News last week they were talking about how mobility scooter users should have to undergo tests and stricter rules for them
Not one mention of these electric bikes or scooters. Yeah lets go for the low hanging fruit as usual.

FrippEnos · 11/02/2025 19:13

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 18:07

Or pedestrians that step out into the road without looking . . .

If you can't stop for someone stepping into the road you are going too fast.

Mere1 · 11/02/2025 19:18

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 18:02

Honestly with shared paths you'd think pedestrians would be cyclist aware but no, they walk in the middle of the track with earpods in, and are totally unaware . . . so let's talk about personal responsibility . . .

You would but motorist have to watch out for the more vulnerable cyclists and cyclists SHOULD take care near pedestrians who are even more vulnerable. . So many go too fast, through red lights at pedestrian crossings and have an outraged sense of superiority cos they are saving the planet.

NoWordForFluffy · 11/02/2025 19:19

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 18:02

Honestly with shared paths you'd think pedestrians would be cyclist aware but no, they walk in the middle of the track with earpods in, and are totally unaware . . . so let's talk about personal responsibility . . .

I regularly walk along a shared path, which is clearly marked with a side for bikes and a side for pedestrians (markings in the path and regular signs). Barely any of the cyclists pay the slightest bit of attention, and often cycle aggressively close to pedestrians in order to (I assume) intimidate.

Maybe the cyclists should be pedestrian aware (and read the Highway Code about priority of road users and the use of shared paths!).

FaithFables · 11/02/2025 19:21

prayforpillsthatwontaffectmeonthemorningafter · 11/02/2025 18:24

The way they play ignorant when I ting the bell at them three times AND say 'excuse me, please'. If they ignore all that, I'm happy to brush past them. I know you can hear me!

How do you know they can hear you? Do you have some sort of deaf person detector? Can you spot airpods in someone's ears from behind when they have long hair/wearing a hat?

FrippEnos · 11/02/2025 19:21

JenniferBooth · 11/02/2025 19:08

On Anglia News last week they were talking about how mobility scooter users should have to undergo tests and stricter rules for them
Not one mention of these electric bikes or scooters. Yeah lets go for the low hanging fruit as usual.

Electric scooters are illegal to ride on public roads and footpaths and can only be used legally on private land.
Electric bikes are all sorts of legal weirdness, from pedal assist to electric motorbikes and off road bikes/dirt bikes. I'm not sure that anybody knows what is going on with any of them as there are so many types..

NoWordForFluffy · 11/02/2025 19:24

prayforpillsthatwontaffectmeonthemorningafter · 11/02/2025 18:24

The way they play ignorant when I ting the bell at them three times AND say 'excuse me, please'. If they ignore all that, I'm happy to brush past them. I know you can hear me!

What if they're deaf? Fucking hell. 🙄

Hugattack · 11/02/2025 19:26

HappySeven · 11/02/2025 18:08

No, I'm not. I only take primary position if it's really tight and sometimes I fail to do that. Even if I did though there's no need for the "punishment passes" I sometimes get after traffic islands.

I drive too and think it would do all motorists/cyclists/ pedestrians good to experience each other's position.

I have a friend who trains lorry drivers to be aware of cyclists by taking them out the road on bikes. They need this training to be eligible to work for certain contractors. I thought this seemed a good initiative and agree with you that a lot of road users would benefit from something similar.

Wishingplenty · 11/02/2025 19:26

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 18:02

Honestly with shared paths you'd think pedestrians would be cyclist aware but no, they walk in the middle of the track with earpods in, and are totally unaware . . . so let's talk about personal responsibility . . .

People should be allowed to walk in peace without the fear of bikes crashing up their backside.

You all want your cake and to eat it too. Free reign of the roads, your own designated lanes and cycle paths in parks. Bloody sick of you all!

Porridgeislife · 11/02/2025 19:30

prayforpillsthatwontaffectmeonthemorningafter · 11/02/2025 18:29

I don't cycle on roads unless there's a cycle path.

Bit of nuance between mowing down a cyclist than catching the bottom of someone's jacket on my bike handle 😂

Til “catching a jacket” doesn’t go the way you intend, and that person is 60+, falls and has a life changing hip injury because you seem to think you need to teach them a lesson.

You are the reason that pedestrians and drivers alike loathe cyclists.

MathsMum3 · 11/02/2025 19:34

crankytoes · 11/02/2025 18:29

There is the capacity for more than one problem you know.
Just because motorists can kill that doesn't absolve cyclists from any responsibility nor does it mean cyclists shouldn't be held to account when they cause injury

And problems come in different sizes.

Personally I'd rather concentrate on stopping the 5 deaths a day (not to mention the 80 also seriously injured) caused by motorists than a few minor injuries a year caused by cyclists.

NotMeNoNo · 11/02/2025 19:41

Segregated cycle lanes that join up properly.
Regulate high powered electric bikes and enforce it.
Awareness campaign for everyone (pedestrian/cyclist/motorist) to be more considerate of each other.

I'm with PP on the shared paths. Please, just walk to one side if you're a solo pedestrian.

MysteriousUsername · 11/02/2025 19:43

I got threatened by a car driver because he did a dangerous overtake of me on a corner and had to swerve to avoid a car coming the opposite way and break to avoid a car at temporary traffic lights. He hit the kerb. This was all my fault for being a cyclist, not his utterly shit driving, so he told me he'd smash my face in.

Another cyclist shouted abuse at me and my DP when we were cycling two abreast on an empty and very wide road.

But yeah, I cycle safely, stop at red lights, am mindful of pedestrians on shared use paths, and I even have insurance.

I am also a car driver and a pedestrian so I am aware of all things on the road. And none of my journeys are more important than the safety of others. Which is what many car drivers seem to forget.

E scooters and those illegal electric bikes are another problem altogether and more should be done about those, weaving in and out of traffic, on and off pavements, without looking. They must think they're invincible.

NoWordForFluffy · 11/02/2025 19:43

NotMeNoNo · 11/02/2025 19:41

Segregated cycle lanes that join up properly.
Regulate high powered electric bikes and enforce it.
Awareness campaign for everyone (pedestrian/cyclist/motorist) to be more considerate of each other.

I'm with PP on the shared paths. Please, just walk to one side if you're a solo pedestrian.

And can cyclists also please stick to one side? The side that is marked and signposted? That would be bloody lovely.

Titsywoo · 11/02/2025 19:48

I appreciate that motorists can be awful to cyclists (although sometimes deserved!) but many cyclists in Central London are incredibly dangerous. They don't stop at red lights and people who are crossing (perfectly legally with a green man showing) are regularly nearly hit. That needs to be clamped down on.

Huckyfell · 11/02/2025 19:49

I think we all tar them with the same brush, but in reality the mountain bikers are all good, they pull out of the way, they smile....
Roadies are the vermin, the overflowings of the cesspit, the step below traffic wardens, the mould on the bread, the crumbs in the jam etc. They ride in clumps along country lanes and smaller roads, you follow them for miles whilst they ignorantly refuse to let you pass, and then undertake the queue of traffic to get to the front of the lights... and they swear and raise fingers at you.
Why do we put up with them?

NotMeNoNo · 11/02/2025 19:51

NoWordForFluffy · 11/02/2025 19:43

And can cyclists also please stick to one side? The side that is marked and signposted? That would be bloody lovely.

I would think that's obvious, the ones I use don't have any dividing line though.

NoWordForFluffy · 11/02/2025 19:53

NotMeNoNo · 11/02/2025 19:51

I would think that's obvious, the ones I use don't have any dividing line though.

Well, you would think that. But the segregated shared path I walk on is like the Wild West! I sometimes get brave and tell cyclists they're on the wrong side, but I'm usually met with a mouthful of abuse.

If they're so stupid as to not be able to read signs and markings, I'm not sure they should be allowed out, tbh!

Bogginsthe3rd · 11/02/2025 19:56

Soon the mamil will split off into its own lineage and no longer be able to breed.

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 21:01

Nextpain · 11/02/2025 18:14

I find it funny how cyclists always explain the things they do by saying it’s easier or safer for them and that it is the motorists responsibility to look out for them as the more vulnerable road users. So cyclists can cycle at 8mph in the middle of the road for miles and no one is meant to get annoyed. Cars are supposed to just accept it and keep back. No overtaking able quite often due to small and busy roads. The cyclist does not have to pull over briefly even if they can because they have just as much right to be there as the car. The cars just need to suck it up because the roads are a shared space and cyclists have priority due to being more vulnerable.

But. God forbid a pedestrian gets in a cyclists way! How dare a more vulnerable slower shared path user get in the way of the quicker more dangerous shared path user!!! Selfish pedestrians not being aware they are causing a blockage and they should immediately leap out the way of any approaching cyclist!

No, just be aware of their surroundings and other people using the space 🙄

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 21:08

SpeedyMcNobhead · 11/02/2025 19:04

It’s funny, during my CBT my instructor was very clear with assume all vehicles are out to kill you…it seems a daft sentiment but actually it’s designed to make you consider how vulnerable you are on a motorbike.

If more cyclist’s had the same approach then I think it would be better, but there does seem to be an awful lot of cyclists who believe the road belongs to them and only them and everyone should make way for them.

The city I live in has spent millions putting bicycle lanes in and yet you still get the arrogant cyclists on the road-why willingly put yourself in the dangerous path when there is a safe place for you to be?

. . . because many of the cycle lanes are badly maintained with overhanging trees and cracks, and you are continually having to giveway where they bisect side roads. On the road you just keep going as it's the main roads priority. That's why.

Maybe give it some thought . . ..

admirible · 11/02/2025 21:20

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 18:02

Honestly with shared paths you'd think pedestrians would be cyclist aware but no, they walk in the middle of the track with earpods in, and are totally unaware . . . so let's talk about personal responsibility . . .

Yeah let’s talk about cyclists on footpaths going at 20 30 mph down hill that’s always fun when your walking slowly along with your dog.

admirible · 11/02/2025 21:21

PrincessofWells · 11/02/2025 21:08

. . . because many of the cycle lanes are badly maintained with overhanging trees and cracks, and you are continually having to giveway where they bisect side roads. On the road you just keep going as it's the main roads priority. That's why.

Maybe give it some thought . . ..

You can very easily contact the council and get them to cut over hanging branches. I did.