Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I do not believe in gender identity.

1000 replies

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 09:05

There are two sexes: male and female. Occasionally, that matters.

There is no such thing as an innate gender identity—no internal essence that makes someone more inclined to wear dresses and sip wine, or football boots and down pints. Those are cultural stereotypes, not proof of some mystical gendered soul.

The idea of gender identity is sexist, misogynistic, and regressive. It reinforces outdated norms instead of challenging them. Women do not need an inner feeling of womanhood to be women. Men do not need a gender identity to be men. Sex is real. Stereotypes are not.

I hope with the flurry of cultural changes, legal challenges, scientific findings and executive orders in the last ~12 months, more people feel able to stand up and be counted, and say - No More.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
MariaThomasFangs · 04/02/2025 15:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Where did I say I didn't accept it? I just think it's silly when just about everything posted on Mumsnet you could say the same thing about!

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/02/2025 15:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

hello - NO DEBATE is over luv.

You nned to get used to talking about this issue, which affects every single one of us, more and more now.

KookyGreenCritic · 04/02/2025 15:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MariaThomasFangs · 04/02/2025 15:35

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

So, you have nothing to add, and you just want us all to shut up about it? Par for the course!

Kalalily · 04/02/2025 15:48

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 15:23

@Kalalily - I actually do have a "traumatised, autistic child who was being caught up in this", and in fact. am doing all the things you said, thanks for the affirming words appreciated

Edited

I’m so sorry that you are going through this too.
As parents, we are in an impossible position. I just hope that threads such as this will be read by teachers and neighbours and friends of trans kids and that they will respond in a more thoughtful manner. I spoke to a teacher about affirmation and she told me that it was the kind thing to do.. She truly believed this but the Cass Report is very clear that socially transitioning is not a neutral act so it is important that society is aware of this and responds accordingly. As parents, we have the best interests of our children at heart and it is devastating to see them being affirmed by people in the community with little or no interest in their long term well-being even if it is done in the name of kindness. No wonder autistic adolescents find that they are treated better as the opposite gender.

maddening · 04/02/2025 15:49

Pilloecat · 04/02/2025 10:35

Transphobia is inherently misogynistic, anti-feminist and just plain boring. You have been fed extremist hate from media and silly buggers like jk Rowling. Parroting it doesn’t make you a free thinker.

Listen to trans people instead of basing your view of them on what hateful people say. This nonsense is just the gay panic rebranded, and I find it very sad. I don’t respond to bigots so if this comment makes you feel upset, please look inwards, don’t waste both our time trying to argue with me- I won’t see your reply. Try to find empathy for one of the most maligned groups of people in society today.

It is not transphobic by any means - happy for anyone to identify as trans, not believing in their ideology is not transphobic. I am not anti-Sikh - but I do not believe in the ideology.

northwestgirl · 04/02/2025 15:54

snowmichael · 04/02/2025 13:58

You're as incorrect as OP
Try reading some science
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780444632333000245

I did 'read some science'
this article discusses anomalies in the sex chromosomes of males and females - as described on this thread earlier- and what the consequences are, and the frequencies
it does not mention any sexes other than male or female

SerendipityJane · 04/02/2025 15:55

northwestgirl · 04/02/2025 15:54

I did 'read some science'
this article discusses anomalies in the sex chromosomes of males and females - as described on this thread earlier- and what the consequences are, and the frequencies
it does not mention any sexes other than male or female

The really key word there is "anomalies".

northwestgirl · 04/02/2025 16:02

indeed

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 16:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

What else is the point of AIBU then?

OP posts:
Cattenberg · 04/02/2025 16:18

@KookyGreenCritic , you could have taken your own advice and scrolled on by, but you decided to try and shut down any discussion. Why?

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 16:19

RobinEllacotStrike · 04/02/2025 15:32

‘This nonsense is just the gay panic rebranded’

All the following are true:

  • trans rights activists ambulance chased the gay rights movement after their success;
  • many gay rights charities, seeing funding dry up after gay marriage was won, looked for a new cause and pivoted to the trans movement. Quelle surprise their funding increased exponentially and no one lost their job;
  • so many people parked their brains and simply believed the trans rights movement was indeed the new civil rights movement without engaging their own minds to think things through;
  • Stonewall had huge amounts of goodwill which they poured into trans rights and used to deceive and manipulate people, companies, NHS, governent departments etc so very successfully;
  • See also the notorious "Dentons document" which advised trans rights organsitions how to have gender identity/self id etc laws passed without proper scrutiny - this happened in NZ, in Ireland etc;
  • Around this time companies needed to offer DEI etc training and most didn't know what to do - so they outsourced to formerly "trusted" organisations like Stonewall, who somehow convinced everyone that sex didn't matter anymore. Stonewall even changed the definitions on their website saying gay people were "same gender attracted" (no longer same sex attracted). Stonewall & retrospectively destroyed their formerly good name & reputation;
  • trans rights are very homophobic - in fact trans "medical care" is 99% conversion therapy for gay people;
  • Trans rights are nothing to do with gay rights - no civil rights movement seeks to take rights away from other people and give a protected group of people additonal rights to everyone else. The trans rights movement is not a civil rights movement;
  • Trans rights movement is like Brexit on steroids - hugely divisive to all groups including lesbians and gay men;
  • Sadik Khan, a massive TRA, has recently removed his pronouns from X.

This is wonderful thank you - these reasons are all why this AIBU was posted, so people know why we need to talk about it now, constantly and publicly

OP posts:
Positivemindyourset · 04/02/2025 16:21

Runor · 04/02/2025 09:45

Well it is quite instructive to see the poll results. I think this is a change from where things would have been a few years ago, and that makes me feel better

That’s because a lot of Folks who support trans people have left mumsnet or don’t click on these threads anymore. From my discussions with friends and acquaintances

ditalini · 04/02/2025 16:27

Positivemindyourset · 04/02/2025 16:21

That’s because a lot of Folks who support trans people have left mumsnet or don’t click on these threads anymore. From my discussions with friends and acquaintances

Feel free to ignore obviously, but is there a reason you used the word "Folks" with a capital F when talking about transpeople and allies?

I'm really interested in common language & stylings used by groups and I wondered if you had a reason for that choice of word, but especially the capitalisation.

SerendipityJane · 04/02/2025 16:33

ditalini · 04/02/2025 16:27

Feel free to ignore obviously, but is there a reason you used the word "Folks" with a capital F when talking about transpeople and allies?

I'm really interested in common language & stylings used by groups and I wondered if you had a reason for that choice of word, but especially the capitalisation.

If you really are that interested, then maybe a platform with autocorrect and "AI" assisted replies may not be the greatest source of data ?

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 16:33

Positivemindyourset · 04/02/2025 16:21

That’s because a lot of Folks who support trans people have left mumsnet or don’t click on these threads anymore. From my discussions with friends and acquaintances

That's called an anecdote. 1100 votes however is quantifiable evidence.

OP posts:
Wemaybebetterstrangers · 04/02/2025 16:34

northwestgirl · 04/02/2025 16:21

https://www.amazon.co.uk/End-World-Flat-Simon-Edge/dp/178563240X
this is a v funny take on what Stonewall did/are doing

Thanks for that, I have seen it before!

LillyPJ · 04/02/2025 16:38

BeaAndBen · 04/02/2025 14:57

She certainly is. Because sex is based on material reality. As mammals we are one of two sexes and cannot change from one to the other. Female or male.

Gender is a set of expectations about appearance, behaviour, abilities etc that a society holds about people of a particular sex. Femininity or masculinity.

What is seen as masculine or feminine changes from culture to culture and across time. High heels were originally worn by men, for example.

People can accept or reject those cultural expectations, or (as most people do) present as a pick and mix jumble of them.

Yes - I know that! I agree we don't have to conform with cultural expectations. That doesn't mean - as the OP says- that there's no such thing as 'gender identity'.

MariaThomasFangs · 04/02/2025 16:41

LillyPJ · 04/02/2025 16:38

Yes - I know that! I agree we don't have to conform with cultural expectations. That doesn't mean - as the OP says- that there's no such thing as 'gender identity'.

If it exists, it only exists as concept that some people believe in and other don't like ghosts or a flat earth or the royal family secretly being lizards people. There is absolutely no empirical evidence that it exists in any meaningful way other than belief.

SerendipityJane · 04/02/2025 16:41

LillyPJ · 04/02/2025 16:38

Yes - I know that! I agree we don't have to conform with cultural expectations. That doesn't mean - as the OP says- that there's no such thing as 'gender identity'.

There is no such thing as gender identity outside of a human mind.

Which is not the same for sex. Which exists whatever we may or may not think.

Who here has read "The Gods Themselves" ?

SerafinasGoose · 04/02/2025 16:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

You're wrong. Mumsnet is more than a discussion forum. It is, where necessity calls for it, a pressure group.

Mumsnet members are responsible for sharing information where no other focum on the www did likewise - albeit some users were banned for calling into attention the very real issues TRA posed for women's rights. It has supported those suffering, 'cancelled', doxed and kicked out of their jobs for saying that sex is real and sometimes it matters. It's crowd funded precedent-making court cases, which women are now overwhelmingly winning in our court system.

For the concept of beliefs 'worthy of respect in a democratic society', we have Maya Forstater to thank. Mumsnetters stood up alongside Kiera Bell when she challenged the Tavistock - a case which at least indirectly led to the Cass report. There are also members of women's rights groups and organisations away from MN posting here - people who have challenged the blacklisting by police of those who have expressed contrary views to gender ideology, without trial or conviction.

Women of Mumsnet were fighting these injustices at a point where the remainder of society was barely aware of them. It's been a long slog, and a great deal has been lost by some women who had the courage to put their heads over the parapet and fight these injustices from the outset.

And we're winning.

ditalini · 04/02/2025 16:43

SerendipityJane · 04/02/2025 16:33

If you really are that interested, then maybe a platform with autocorrect and "AI" assisted replies may not be the greatest source of data ?

If it's just an autocorrect then that's my answer - but there's a vocabulary used around certain topics and there can be intention in punctuation and the use of capitalisation within groups, and yes I'm interested. This is just a question, nothing more to be read into it.

CautiousLurker01 · 04/02/2025 16:47

SernieBanders · 04/02/2025 15:23

@Kalalily - I actually do have a "traumatised, autistic child who was being caught up in this", and in fact. am doing all the things you said, thanks for the affirming words appreciated

Edited

Wish there was a hug/solidarity emoji. Mum of traumatised, autistic child caught up in this. Two, if you count the innocent non-trans-identifying younger sibling caught in the middle of it, because they should count too.

🫂

Positivemindyourset · 04/02/2025 16:47

ditalini · 04/02/2025 16:27

Feel free to ignore obviously, but is there a reason you used the word "Folks" with a capital F when talking about transpeople and allies?

I'm really interested in common language & stylings used by groups and I wondered if you had a reason for that choice of word, but especially the capitalisation.

No I was just typing quickly and it came out on auto from my phone. It was near the start of the sentence so just a coincidence I think.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread