Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Parents complaining about this in school?

167 replies

WillowAnn · 08/01/2025 01:30

DC are not properly watched whilst eating at dinner time and allowed to just go outside whenever they’re finished. So they could basically have no dinner or just a very small amount and then go out to play. Staff don’t advise them to eat more or say they can’t go out until they’ve eaten. Parents are complaining. Any thoughts?

OP posts:
EMary12345 · 08/01/2025 10:22

As a primary teacher this complaint happens nearly daily in one of the classes- why didn't my child eat their lunch?! I'm not sure what teachers are meant to do about it 🤷‍♀️ all children are given food but after that point I don't think there's anything we can do! We have 120 children in a sitting with 3 dinner ladies - this includes them serving the meals! We don't let packed lunch children put food on the bin - everything stays in their lunchbox so parents can see what they've had.

LazyArsedMagician · 08/01/2025 10:26

Sure I saw a post the other day about parents complaining about kids being told to sit in silence for ten minutes, presumably to ensure they do all eat at least some of their lunch, but some parents thinking it was some awful draconian punishment.

I was one of the ones once forced to eat something I didn't like before I could go outside. I was genuinely a good kid, well behaved, well liked, quite and studious, so crying because Mrs Freeman wouldn't let me go till I ate my cream cake ("why did you take one if you don't like it?", "because I wasn't allowed to not take a pudding and I don't like rice pudding either", "don't be impertinent!") made a lasting impression. I was in Y4.

I had a child who'd regularly come home with a full lunch box, because he wanted to play and was a slow eater. He's 13 now, on the skinny side to be truthful, but eating his lunches after school doesn't seem to have made much of an impact otherwise!

So in answer to your question - let school do what they think is best.

TwinklyFawn · 08/01/2025 10:30

I can still remember the dreadful primary i went to. Once i had a minor cold. My school sent a note home to say that i had not eatten all my dinner. I was actually well enough to be in. I was just eating a bit less.

CwmYoy · 08/01/2025 10:35

There is not the time, as others have said. Daft to expect it.

Hyperbowl · 08/01/2025 10:58

Forcing children to eat when they’re not hungry creates disordered eating. This is just common sense. Of course they can’t police hundreds of school children. As a child who was watched like a hawk by the dinner ladies and forced to eat every single morsel of food I can honestly tell you it was horrible and causes much more harm than good. I’m glad these days are long gone. As PP have said, children have to take some responsibility for their actions so you need to have a discussion about how it’s important that they prioritise eating their lunch before playing outside. Teachers are there to teach and have lots of other jobs to do. Genuinely, without trying to sound snarky it’s not their job to parent your child, it’s yours. You need to set out your expectations of them for when you’re not around.

Give your children a substantial breakfast and send with packed lunches if you can. If they don’t eat it at dinner let them eat it after school. Failing that, get some healthy snacks made up so they can eat them instead after school. My secondary aged son is a slow eater, doesn’t get a very long lunch break and spends most of his lunch time talking to his friends. He will come home and eat what’s left of his lunch then has his tea about roughly two hours later. Just like adults we can’t force ourselves to feel hungry when we’re not and hunger cues aren’t always routine.

oldwhyno · 08/01/2025 11:04

Parents are daft

SailingOnAWave · 08/01/2025 11:06

I think at my child's school they sit for 15 mins and then allowed to leave, but if they finish after 5 mins they sit for another ten minutes.

SiobhanSharpe · 08/01/2025 11:36

I think it can be done. At DS' all boys secondary, they hired a young chef.
This was in the mid 90s to mid 2000s, the school had over 1,000 boys, a fairly standard comp (not selective) in a mid size market town and very popular. Excelled at sport but not half bad academically too.
The school meals were so good they were popular even with the staff, lots ate there voluntarily even though they paid if they weren't on lunchtime duty. There was always a salad option too.
I remember DS, who was and is very interested in food and cooking, having many conversations about recipes with the chef.
Of course this takes money. I don't know what it's like these days almost 20 years on.

Kenway · 08/01/2025 11:43

For me I can understand, but then it's down to the individual to decide otherwise eg what if feeling full from night before or not hungry etc

Cappuccinowithonesugarplease · 08/01/2025 12:07

Atlasvue · 08/01/2025 09:35

Well I can assure at my school in the 90s, there was no such sight. Scottish working class town, where 40% of the kids qualified for free school meals. Everybody ate their lunch and happily.

Well I went to a 'naice' primary school in a naice village in the south of the uk and it was horrendous.

rainbowstardrops · 08/01/2025 13:50

*Schools are in loco parentis. You are responsible for looking after the child while they are in your care. So yes, it is your responsibility to get a child to eat if they aren't eating well, because that's basic care. Primary school children are still very young, especially in KS1 and in early KS2.

Unless schools are going to let parents come into school to help their child at lunch, then yes staff should be doing that, it's all part of the job.

I went to a private school and our lunchtime was a set time when we all sat at long tables and ate at the same time. Once everyone was finished and the plates cleared, then we went out to play. Quick eaters learned to chat to others, slow ones learned to speed up a bit before the course was cleared. Each table was supervised by a teacher sitting and eating with us.

I think a similar system of a set eating time as a previous poster also suggested would help a lot. Fast eaters would know they had to sit and chat, and slow ones would know they had a set time in which to eat. Then everyone gets the same playtime.

My son was one of those who would not eat because he just wanted to go and play, ace I had to ask the school to monitor him a bit because he was starving and so angry by hometime as a result. Some days he was literally only eating a packet of crisps. If I only gave him crisps for lunch and no other food that would be seen as neglect, but people on this thread seen to think it's ok if it happens at school. It's baffling.

I despair of this attitude that children's basic human needs are inconveniencing teachers. Education is about much more than numeracy and literacy and if you don't know that then you shouldn't be teaching.*

With all due respect, we're generally not talking about private schools here and I'll hazard a guess that your experience of school lunchtimes are very different to a standard school!
In my infant school we had 180 children and one school hall for ONE hour. Reception ate first then year 1 and then year 2. This was all with a maximum of 6 MDSAs but usually far, far less. We needed sufficient staff for the playground, sufficient staff for the children eating and sufficient staff to clear the hall promptly at the end of the lunch hour, so that PE/interventions could commence after the afternoon register.
We simply couldn't ensure that every child was given adequate support to eat all of their lunch but we did our absolute best! I said earlier on, some parents complained that their children were slow eaters and encouraged to eat a little bit more and then missed some of their playtime and some complained because they had told their children to eat their (often huge) packed lunch and didn't get much time to run around. We can't win!
We didn't have the luxury of fast eaters chatting to the slow eaters, or that the slower ones would just eat faster!!!! What a privileged experience you had!!!
Oh and each table had a teacher sitting with them? Our teachers barely have time to make a coffee and gulp down a Pot Noodle whilst preparing the afternoon session at their desk! Or replying to emails or ringing parents who criticise the smallest bloody ridiculous complaints!
In all fairness, if that's how you think state schools are then you are severely delusional!
(And have never worked in a state school!)

Namechangedforgoodreasons · 08/01/2025 14:16

Maboscelar · 08/01/2025 09:52

Schools are in loco parentis. You are responsible for looking after the child while they are in your care. So yes, it is your responsibility to get a child to eat if they aren't eating well, because that's basic care. Primary school children are still very young, especially in KS1 and in early KS2.

Unless schools are going to let parents come into school to help their child at lunch, then yes staff should be doing that, it's all part of the job.

I went to a private school and our lunchtime was a set time when we all sat at long tables and ate at the same time. Once everyone was finished and the plates cleared, then we went out to play. Quick eaters learned to chat to others, slow ones learned to speed up a bit before the course was cleared. Each table was supervised by a teacher sitting and eating with us.

I think a similar system of a set eating time as a previous poster also suggested would help a lot. Fast eaters would know they had to sit and chat, and slow ones would know they had a set time in which to eat. Then everyone gets the same playtime.

My son was one of those who would not eat because he just wanted to go and play, ace I had to ask the school to monitor him a bit because he was starving and so angry by hometime as a result. Some days he was literally only eating a packet of crisps. If I only gave him crisps for lunch and no other food that would be seen as neglect, but people on this thread seen to think it's ok if it happens at school. It's baffling.

I despair of this attitude that children's basic human needs are inconveniencing teachers. Education is about much more than numeracy and literacy and if you don't know that then you shouldn't be teaching.

Edited

The basic human need is for the child to be given palatable food, not to be forced to eat it if they don’t want to. It was your job to make it clear to your son that you expected him to eat more than just a bag of crisps (why give him crisps if you knew that was going to happen?), not the school's job to "get him to eat". Fair enough to ask the school to remind him, but that’s all.

ItGhoul · 08/01/2025 14:18

They can't possibly watch every single child and individually coax them to eat more. Chances are that the children are perfectly fine. I don't think it's up to schools to decide how much/little someone's child eats.

PurpleThistle7 · 08/01/2025 15:48

There is definitely no supervision in the way you are describing but there are teachers around to make sure there's no fighting / choking / etc. and then a handful of teachers in the playground to keep an eye on them (primary school)

For my daughter in high school kids eat wherever and there's no one watching anything. There are some quiet spaces with supervision for children who want that option.

CaptainMyCaptain · 08/01/2025 15:49

PurpleThistle7 · 08/01/2025 15:48

There is definitely no supervision in the way you are describing but there are teachers around to make sure there's no fighting / choking / etc. and then a handful of teachers in the playground to keep an eye on them (primary school)

For my daughter in high school kids eat wherever and there's no one watching anything. There are some quiet spaces with supervision for children who want that option.

They're not teachers, though, they're Midday Supervisors. They can pass on messages if they want a parent to know they're child isn't eating but they are not teachers

Topseyt123 · 08/01/2025 15:50

Barrenfieldoffucks · 08/01/2025 10:15

I still remember being made to sit at the table at home with a plate of cold food in front of me with my dad telling me I couldn't leave the table until I finished it. Didn't stop me being a Selective eater as an adult.

This was done to me too as a small child. If I still didn't eat it then it was put in the fridge and returned to me at the next mealtime.

It didn't work and just made me dread mealtimes. It was only done at home, not at school. Oddly enough, I did eat a bit more at school than I did at home. My parents were very much of the "clear your plate" ilk. I just wasn't usually hungry as often as they thought I should be though and it turned mealtimes into a battleground, which none of us enjoyed.

Huffleruff · 08/01/2025 16:08

My eldest is 17 and I've got stories about him being forced to eat his lunch during primary. Not being allowed to leave the dinner hall until his plate was cleared. Also being "told off" about the contents of his lunchbox. Once, i gave him a pre cooked mini pizza as a treat, vegetable sticks and dip that sort of thing and they refused to let him eat it because it was "junk food" they made him have a school dinner and i was charged for it. Obviously I wasn't at all happy about those incidents.

I've also got a 7 year old who is a bad eater. Very picky. He won't eat school dinners, we tried for a while and he wasn't monitored so pretty much every day he wasn't eating any food whilst at school. Nobody really knew because he wasn't paid attention to, he'd come home from school in tears because he was so hungry and we couldn't work out what was going on. I'd have liked a bit more supervision in that instance.

At his school, the headteacher has recently asked parents in the newsletter not to "overfeed" their children by keeping lunchboxes to a minimum and reminding parents that any snacks other than a piece of fruit are not allowed and will be removed from the child.

I'm not one for schools interfering so think it's all a bit bloody ridiculous to be honest, but its totally dependent on the individual child and situation.

TooManyChristmasCards · 08/01/2025 16:11

Dramatic · 08/01/2025 09:58

If you offered him a sandwich and packet of crisps at home but he only ate the packet of crisps then of course it's not neglect

can you imagine being accused of neglect every time your toddler/ child refuses to eat something 😂

Watsername · 08/01/2025 19:20

Honestly, schools can’t win. I was a TA for 10 years and had to cover lunches.

Parents complain if you don’t encourage eating, and complain if you do.

I would encourage a child to eat, but would never ‘force’ the matter. The amount of food wastage is absolutely shocking at lunchtime. Most children will happily eat a few more mouthfuls if you gently ask them to.

And yes, water bottles are a pain too - always available to the child, but it’s school’s fault if they’ve not been touched. (It’s also the TA’s fault if the bottle goes missing as they are supposed to know where all 30/60 bottles are at all times - and TAs are personally responsible for every (unnamed) jumper).

BeavisMcTavish · 08/01/2025 20:55

WillowAnn · 08/01/2025 01:30

DC are not properly watched whilst eating at dinner time and allowed to just go outside whenever they’re finished. So they could basically have no dinner or just a very small amount and then go out to play. Staff don’t advise them to eat more or say they can’t go out until they’ve eaten. Parents are complaining. Any thoughts?

First question - how old are the kids?

and no, beyond say Year 4 I don’t think the lunch hitlers should be dictating how many more mouthfuls before break. Kids that ages will soon learn - truth be told looking round the play ground, not cramming their faces full of food would do 30% of the Year the power of good!

PurpleThistle7 · 08/01/2025 22:43

CaptainMyCaptain · 08/01/2025 15:49

They're not teachers, though, they're Midday Supervisors. They can pass on messages if they want a parent to know they're child isn't eating but they are not teachers

I don’t know what this means. There is a rota of teachers who supervise? I know them all and they’re definitely teachers.

CaptainMyCaptain · 09/01/2025 07:20

PurpleThistle7 · 08/01/2025 22:43

I don’t know what this means. There is a rota of teachers who supervise? I know them all and they’re definitely teachers.

I don't know why they are doing that then. Lunch time supervision is not in their contract unless it's a Private school or a Free school or some such thing with a different contract.

rainbowstardrops · 09/01/2025 07:34

Watsername · 08/01/2025 19:20

Honestly, schools can’t win. I was a TA for 10 years and had to cover lunches.

Parents complain if you don’t encourage eating, and complain if you do.

I would encourage a child to eat, but would never ‘force’ the matter. The amount of food wastage is absolutely shocking at lunchtime. Most children will happily eat a few more mouthfuls if you gently ask them to.

And yes, water bottles are a pain too - always available to the child, but it’s school’s fault if they’ve not been touched. (It’s also the TA’s fault if the bottle goes missing as they are supposed to know where all 30/60 bottles are at all times - and TAs are personally responsible for every (unnamed) jumper).

I was a TA too and I could have written your post word for word!
Some of the complaints we had were absolutely ludicrous!
Some parents should go into schools and see exactly the shit that school staff are expected to put up with! I left after over 13 years because it just became impossible to do my job properly.

Notrynajudge · 09/01/2025 07:38

I'm glad the children aren't forced to eat.

I have very clear memories of being bullied and berated by the lunch time assistants to finish the cold hard boiled potatoes. It felt abusive and extremely distressing. This was London in the 90s!

Cocothecoconut · 09/01/2025 07:46

Some of our kids have been known to get food , walk round the table and put it straight in the bin
yes they are encouraged because a lot of them would rather sit and talk and some don’t even know how to use cutlery