Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ageism,ignorance, intolerance. class bias on mumsnet re Waspi women

455 replies

CAJIE · 20/12/2024 00:27

I did not honestly expect any compensation though I might have hoped. Iwas aware of this change but did not have the chance to make extra provision for it.I do have a professional pension but will have to wait a while longer for the state pension which is extremely challenging.My plans were changed by covid and I doubt I will be employed again except possibly on poor and temporary contracts or gig economy.Secondary school supply on a daily basis has more or less gone.
However what appals me is the attitudes of many mumsnetters who assume that everyone has the abiity to understand pensions and that the Waspi women should have taken so called control of their situation.Maybe some could but there is a hell of a lot of class bias towards the women in lower paid jobs who perhaps were overwhelmed by struggling to survive and did not understand or read the news or the pension changes were not clearly explained to them.Pensions can be hard to understand and provoke anxiety.This appalling prejudice that all older people are rolling in it and this nice habit of some younger women to be sadly quite misogynistic and ageist towards women who are in poverty is very concerning.All sections of society should thrive even in older age and perhaps you younger women should be challenging society, housing costs, the whole ideology of owning a house and actually trying to build something new rather than bitching about what boomers have and their endless cruises etc.
.You are turning against your sex and the comments are cruel and harsh.You know nothing about these womens lives.
Starmer wants to punish older people and older women are always a good target.Your spite about all the things that boomers are supposed to have and you apparently dont is unpleasant.Women beware women.Very sad and against justice.

OP posts:
Sharptonguedwoman · 20/12/2024 09:38

I don't think compensation for these women is a priority. I would, however, be more than happy for my taxes to be increased in order
@MrsBennetsPoorNerves Since when has anything for women been a priority?

losingweightandgainingconfidence · 20/12/2024 09:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sharptonguedwoman · 20/12/2024 09:41

nepkoztarsasag · 20/12/2024 00:41

How did you vote in the Brexit referendum as a matter of interest?

Why is this relevant?

Anonym00se · 20/12/2024 09:42

ismu · 20/12/2024 08:22

@Anonym00se it's clear that YOU don't understand pensions. While NI is not a personal pot it's intrinsically linked to contributions. It was part of retirement planning for many women and if anyone believes that 11 years contributions will add much to a pension they are a fool. Compound interest needs at least 25 years.
There have been a number of recent cases including the recent public sector remedy which have given WASPI women cause for hope. The fire service won a successful case against an increase in retirement age which has resulted in a complete backpedal by government. Of course they are mainly men.
The ombudsman's decision is just being completely ignored here because the women are disparate and not in one union. And are not men.

I do understand pensions. My point was that lots of people are completely ignorant about their projected retirement income, whether that comes from state or private pensions.

Eyresandgraces · 20/12/2024 09:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Actually the Waspi women like me were celebrating when Labour got in in 1997.
We'd had 18 years of Tory government and they were voted in by young and old alike.
Mostly on the basis of lies, strikes and then the Falklands war.
Who do you think mostly voted Labour in 1997?
My age group, 40 at the time.

When your 60 plus what do you think the younger generation will blame you for?
Because there will be something.

ismu · 20/12/2024 09:43

@losingweightandgainingconfidence
The idea that the whole of one generation and no other was happy to see schools and hospitals decimated is absurd.
Voters across all ages and demographics are idiots-and a lot of them live in the South East of England, where they're disproportionately represented in parliament.

But it's easy to blame some old women.

losingweightandgainingconfidence · 20/12/2024 09:45

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Eyresandgraces · 20/12/2024 09:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What an absolutely ridiculous statement.
You think we're happy to see our dd's giving birth in substandard hospitals and our dgc going to substandard schools?

Get a grip.

losingweightandgainingconfidence · 20/12/2024 09:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Cluelesssanta · 20/12/2024 09:47

Some, incredibly selfish, younger women, need to consider that they may be benefitting in many ways, in which these older women did not. They seem to have no clue as to what life as a women in our unequal society was like for women of this ahe group. . Or about societal expectations of women.
I'm not in the targeted age group, but I am probably older than the average MN'r. I'm not shouting about having to subsidise their child care!

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 20/12/2024 09:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So compensate the WASPI women in the South Wales valleys that have not returned a Tory MP in a generation or are they excluded because some of them voted for Brexit?

Can’t you see what you are doing? You are saying the Government can get away with maladministration against people you blame for something. There are groups in this country who would very much like to enforce that policy against particular groups they blame for all the ills of society.

Everyone has to get fair treatment irrespective of characteristics such as political beliefs or we head in a very grim direction indeed.

Whatafustercluck · 20/12/2024 09:48

Gem359 · 20/12/2024 07:51

Yes but there were a lot of things they have found money for - like a pay rise of 15% over 3 years for train drivers who are already highly paid and can be on £60,000 within a few years.

The average annual increase planned in Labour's budget was larger than every spending review since 1998 except for 2002.

Women are bottom of the pile though when it comes to this government it seems, not sure they even know what one is.

People on here seem to despise the elderly, sure that they're all secretly loaded. My mum is working 2 jobs in her 70's to keep the 2 bed house she's lived in all her life.

If you knew about the pension changes then no need to claim for the money, but people should stop saying that it shouldn't be paid out just because they knew.

It's for the people who didn't know.

Edited

Why is it that train drivers don't deserve their money, but high earners in other sectors do? We don't live in a meritocratic society. If we did, paid carers would earn more. We would value those kinds of jobs way more than we do. And i include teachers in that, too. Train strikes were also crippling the economy. People need public transport to get around. If they can't get to work, to big events etc then it harms the economy.

You say the money is for those who didn't know about that changes. How can we be sure who that applies to?

Nobody despises the elderly. Pensioners though have been very well protected from cuts over the years (the triple lock remains in place, affording considerable protection that many others don't have) while other sections of society have had to carry the weight (those on other forms of benefit, for example). All that's happening now is that the burden is being more fairly distributed.

ismu · 20/12/2024 09:49

@losingweightandgainingconfidence
You seem to be very keen on revenge against your grandparents.
Let's hope you manage to move beyond mindless hatred towards any one group and start to fight injustice and obscene corporate wealth instead.

losingweightandgainingconfidence · 20/12/2024 09:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Eyresandgraces · 20/12/2024 09:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Yes, statistically they did.
Personally I've never voted tory in my life.
However what is becoming apparent is that better education amongst younger people means, thankfully, that less are voting Tory.
The Tories have historically done well amongst skilled manual occupations.
Amongst retirees this group is still quite high.

ssd · 20/12/2024 09:56

Reading this thread, i agree there is a lot of unfairness going on. And i can understand waspi womens complaints, some more than others.

But.....i don't think it compares to the unfairness being experienced by young people now. The world they are facing is much worse than the one we grew up in (I'm late 50s). Right to buy has enabled many people my age to get on the housing ladder, whilst its ripped out any hope of a decent council house for the young...at the same age we were getting a council house without much effort. The rents young people are paying are mind blowing. They dont all have a starbucks habit and the latest iphones, that might be the ones still at home mid 20s and working full time. The rest are struggling as they had to move away and dont have inheritance money to fall back on.

So as much as i feel some waspi women were treated unfairly, i dont think its a patch on what the current generation will experience by the time they retire....which will probably be in their 70s..

Porcuporpoise · 20/12/2024 09:58

Cluelesssanta · 20/12/2024 09:47

Some, incredibly selfish, younger women, need to consider that they may be benefitting in many ways, in which these older women did not. They seem to have no clue as to what life as a women in our unequal society was like for women of this ahe group. . Or about societal expectations of women.
I'm not in the targeted age group, but I am probably older than the average MN'r. I'm not shouting about having to subsidise their child care!

And why would you (I should say we because I reckon I'm about your age) be shouting about paying their childcare? Childcare is paid to parents who work and pay taxes and they're exactly the people who'll be paying for our stare pensions and healthcare when we retire.

SovietSpy · 20/12/2024 10:05

Cluelesssanta · 20/12/2024 09:47

Some, incredibly selfish, younger women, need to consider that they may be benefitting in many ways, in which these older women did not. They seem to have no clue as to what life as a women in our unequal society was like for women of this ahe group. . Or about societal expectations of women.
I'm not in the targeted age group, but I am probably older than the average MN'r. I'm not shouting about having to subsidise their child care!

Do you genuinely think society is equal for young women now?

DaphneduM · 20/12/2024 10:11

The accelerated increase under Osborne's 2011 pensions act was so unfair. It gave the Waspi women very little notice indeed - in my case this only gave me five years notice of a further increase in pension age. Yes, I knew and had made financial decisions on the 1995 Act, fair enough. But to be hammered again at such short notice was totally unreasonable and I was by no means the worse affected. The women born in 1954 had their pension age increased by a further two years - disgusting.

natwalesrug · 20/12/2024 10:13

NutNutmum · 20/12/2024 09:31

It's quite obvious @CAJIE from reading a lot of posts on MN the younger generation generally have no idea just how times have changed they see the lives the WASPI women were living comparable to today.

For instance how many understand a time when there were only 3 channels on the TV and turned off at 12pm. All the news was pretty much in the newspapers only, if you bought and read them.

There was no internet or social media or forums like MN. The internet only became mainstream around 1999/2000.

They casually blame women for not following what was going on. Getting information was incredibly hard compared to now days where you can pull out your phone and it's at your fingertips.

Women bringing up kids at home dids not have the luxury of sitting watching 1 channel or reading the news paper if they did not receive or get a single letter.

The blinkers on modern society is what is the Issue and ignorance of the lives of the older generation.

Edited

This👆👆👆👆👆

Pettifoggery83 · 20/12/2024 10:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What a stupid statement

Jellycatspyjamas · 20/12/2024 10:16

If women like me, who have the means, time and education don’t stand up and say something about ignoring the ombudsman, about discriminatory pay practices, poor maternity practices etc etc then the younger generation of women will end up having to re fight battles we all thought were won.

In fairness those battles are never won, each generation of women have to repeatedly fight to protect their rights because there’s always men trying to erode what has been so hard fought for - only now the men are wearing dresses and calling themselves feminists.

You’re deluded if you think any “right” or protection afforded to women is a done deal.

Pussycat22 · 20/12/2024 10:20

Eyresandgraces · 20/12/2024 09:43

Actually the Waspi women like me were celebrating when Labour got in in 1997.
We'd had 18 years of Tory government and they were voted in by young and old alike.
Mostly on the basis of lies, strikes and then the Falklands war.
Who do you think mostly voted Labour in 1997?
My age group, 40 at the time.

When your 60 plus what do you think the younger generation will blame you for?
Because there will be something.

They'll be blamed for freedom of speech taken away and creating Stepford people!!!

losingweightandgainingconfidence · 20/12/2024 10:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

khaitai · 20/12/2024 10:23

Bringing up historic injustices against women is a silly argument. It's not younger women's fault that you needed a husband to get a credit card. And you didn't fight for those rights for future generations, you fought for your own rights. Which is totally understandable.

If we're going to bring up all these injustices then ultimately young women have some pretty big trump cards. We're inheriting unprecedented levels of national debt and a dying planet. I think I'd happily trade in my credit card at this point.