Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To be worried about what the Labour government will do next?

1000 replies

Scenicgirl · 17/12/2024 22:46

Let's be honest, Labour has been a massive disappointment for this country, pissing off the pensioners with taking away the WFA, the farmers, NI changes which impact employers, immigration etc and today refusing compensation to the WASPI women after they ridiculed the Conservatives when they didn't commit to a solution. Don't we deserve better than this constant shit show of lies and deceptions which were clearly spouted out purely to gain power?
For the 1st time in my life, I worry about where we are heading.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 14:58

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 14:56

As has been pointed out, we’re five months in.

Introducing policies that the BoE show are stagnating the economy and managing to disrupt growth from first half of the year isn't great

Not long but also not good

Again. In your view. Which has been challenged here by greater intellects than mine.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 14:58

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 14:57

Are you actually agreeing that this policy is idealogical rather than for money raising reason like RR is claiming? Quite refreshing!

Yes I would hope so.

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:00

Again. In your view. Which has been challenged here by greater intellects than mine.

You flatter those Labour mn posts as expected but still not correct

All posts have citing from BoE and S&P

Did you miss the BoE quote below?

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:02

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:00

Again. In your view. Which has been challenged here by greater intellects than mine.

You flatter those Labour mn posts as expected but still not correct

All posts have citing from BoE and S&P

Did you miss the BoE quote below?

As far as I know, no.

TizerorFizz · 19/12/2024 15:03

Won’t make much difference to Starmer dc. They could have gone anywhere with their parental connections. Oh! Wait a minute! They did, didn’t they. A multimillion £ flat to revise. Some state education. I would respect all these Labour people more if they put their money where the crap schools are. Let’s see if they, as parents, get round to improving them.

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:04

As far as I know, no.

It's a credible source why do you defer to some Labour mners over that?

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:04

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 14:57

Gosh is that what equality means to you? How sad.

I don't really care actually any more. I don't think Labour know what equality means since the budget. Preferential treatment for the public sector. Unequal treatment for everyone else. They can't shrilly cry about private school kids now when they are shafting farmers, WASPIs, young people, pensioners etc. It's one rule for Labour one rule for everyone else. So I'm afraid your argument doesn't work any more. If you argue "equality" you have to apply it equally to everyone.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:05

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:04

As far as I know, no.

It's a credible source why do you defer to some Labour mners over that?

Not my area of knowledge.

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:07

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 14:58

Yes I would hope so.

Terrible. We haven't got the money for that sort of luxury. When you ask farmers to die to fund the NHS, idealogical fiddling is disastrous. As we are seeing.

Monka · 19/12/2024 15:07

Well my mortgage went up by £500 a month thanks to Liz Truss and the Tory govt. our public services are decimated look at the mess the water companies are in! All the papers owned by billionaires unsurprisingly detest labour and are coming after them hard, yet when Truss messed up they let that go very quickly. Plus if she hadn’t backed down when she did we would have lost more money off our pensions as the Bank of England couldn’t intervene any more when she experimented with our economy. So no I am not worried about Labour.

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:08

Not my area of knowledge.

Yes I'm sure but it's the BoE, most will see it as a good source

I wonder if Reeves has a similar style atm. Just ignore stuff

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:09

Are you actually agreeing that this policy is idealogical rather than for money raising reason like RR is claiming? Quite refreshing!

@ChallahPlaiter since you answered yes to this how would you fund the 6,500 extra teachers?

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:09

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:04

I don't really care actually any more. I don't think Labour know what equality means since the budget. Preferential treatment for the public sector. Unequal treatment for everyone else. They can't shrilly cry about private school kids now when they are shafting farmers, WASPIs, young people, pensioners etc. It's one rule for Labour one rule for everyone else. So I'm afraid your argument doesn't work any more. If you argue "equality" you have to apply it equally to everyone.

Sure. But inequality is not a single line definition. Is it right to pay compensation to people who may not have actually lost out at all? To absolve a profession from paying IHT when there’s evidence of people taking up that profession as a means of tax avoidance?
The modern day concept of equality isn’t about treating everyone exactly the same. It’s about ensuring equality of opportunity. Nobody can argue that a two tier education system offers that.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:09

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:09

Are you actually agreeing that this policy is idealogical rather than for money raising reason like RR is claiming? Quite refreshing!

@ChallahPlaiter since you answered yes to this how would you fund the 6,500 extra teachers?

Again not my area of expertise.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:10

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:08

Not my area of knowledge.

Yes I'm sure but it's the BoE, most will see it as a good source

I wonder if Reeves has a similar style atm. Just ignore stuff

Unlikely, from the Chancellor.

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:10

Monka · 19/12/2024 15:07

Well my mortgage went up by £500 a month thanks to Liz Truss and the Tory govt. our public services are decimated look at the mess the water companies are in! All the papers owned by billionaires unsurprisingly detest labour and are coming after them hard, yet when Truss messed up they let that go very quickly. Plus if she hadn’t backed down when she did we would have lost more money off our pensions as the Bank of England couldn’t intervene any more when she experimented with our economy. So no I am not worried about Labour.

Well I understand from today's figures that old Rach has actually done worse than Liz Truss vis a vis the bond markets!! Imagine how annoying THAT'S going to be to Rach when she has to argue that ok she's crap but at least Liz Truss was worse. Not so fast now....

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:10

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:07

Terrible. We haven't got the money for that sort of luxury. When you ask farmers to die to fund the NHS, idealogical fiddling is disastrous. As we are seeing.

Can we afford not to work towards a more equitable society?

EasternStandard · 19/12/2024 15:13

Again not my area of expertise.

Unlikely, from the Chancellor.

Idk there seems to be some strong side stepping going on from Labour and on here

GasPanic · 19/12/2024 15:13

Monka · 19/12/2024 15:07

Well my mortgage went up by £500 a month thanks to Liz Truss and the Tory govt. our public services are decimated look at the mess the water companies are in! All the papers owned by billionaires unsurprisingly detest labour and are coming after them hard, yet when Truss messed up they let that go very quickly. Plus if she hadn’t backed down when she did we would have lost more money off our pensions as the Bank of England couldn’t intervene any more when she experimented with our economy. So no I am not worried about Labour.

You'll notice though that under Labour bond yields haven't exactly come down though.

In fact yesterday the 10 year was at a 15 year high.

Wonder why that is ? (scratches head).

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:16

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:10

Can we afford not to work towards a more equitable society?

When you say "we" who do you mean? Because Labour aren't working towards a more equitable society (clearly) and unless one of us on this thread is Elon Musk I don't think anyone else can help with this?

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:19

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:16

When you say "we" who do you mean? Because Labour aren't working towards a more equitable society (clearly) and unless one of us on this thread is Elon Musk I don't think anyone else can help with this?

As a society.

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:20

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:09

Sure. But inequality is not a single line definition. Is it right to pay compensation to people who may not have actually lost out at all? To absolve a profession from paying IHT when there’s evidence of people taking up that profession as a means of tax avoidance?
The modern day concept of equality isn’t about treating everyone exactly the same. It’s about ensuring equality of opportunity. Nobody can argue that a two tier education system offers that.

I see you are arguing that penalising people with tax means equality of opportunity. We all equally have the opportunity to be shafted by taxation. Is that what socialism is? It really is the utopia we all dreamt of.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:22

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:20

I see you are arguing that penalising people with tax means equality of opportunity. We all equally have the opportunity to be shafted by taxation. Is that what socialism is? It really is the utopia we all dreamt of.

No I’m not because I don’t see tax as a punishment. I see it as a contribution.

twistyizzy · 19/12/2024 15:26

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:22

No I’m not because I don’t see tax as a punishment. I see it as a contribution.

Out of interest do you do the voluntary increased monthly income tax contribution to HMRC? Easy to do via direct debit
Or do you just prefer spending other people's money when it comes to taxation?

Nordione1 · 19/12/2024 15:26

ChallahPlaiter · 19/12/2024 15:19

As a society.

Yes. No. Thanks to Labour revealing the hypocrisy of "equality" for all I think that argument has had its day. Ironic really that it took a socialist government to reveal the weakness. As in we are all equally stuffed apart from a chosen few favourites. Remember the Rule of The Socialist. Everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.