Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance Tax

290 replies

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 13:38

Is it wrong to try and avoid inheritance tax? Is inheritance tax itself unfair? Has your family taken any measures to avoid it?

OP posts:
caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:10

BIossomtoes · 21/11/2024 12:11

We’ll see. Her competence or otherwise will only be determined with time.

Her budget proposals will send inflation back up accordingly to the BoE governor.

Cosyblankets · 21/11/2024 13:12

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 00:41

I gift the £3k money each year to DC and £250 to DGC. Then I gift them out of my regular incomings which is all perfectly legal. If my DS gets married I'll gift the maximum I can. I'll pay for their holidays too. I DH and I die together they'll have to pay IT. I just really hope Labour get kicked out and it gets reversed by whoever gets in next. I've also put 4 houses into a limited company and will be taking legal advice if I can just add DC and DGC as shareholders. Then I think they'd only pay 19 percent as they take money out. Not sure of what else I can do. I'll probably gift a house to both DGS's and hope to live 7 more years or not sure if Labour are planning to change it to 10 years. They'll have to pay tax on the rest, but I'll be leaving some to the Cats Protection League so that will reduce IT.

You have an allowance for IHT each of 325k.
If one of you dies first and their estate is below that then the remaining allowance is transferred to the other. So say you die leaving 300k there's 25k allowance left to transfer so your husband's allowance then becomes 350k
If you both die together the total amount is 650k so it makes no difference.

A solicitor recently did probate for a relative of mine who was widowed almost 30 years ago and he wanted the original marriage certificate in case he needed the allowance transferring over

CallMeDaphne · 21/11/2024 13:14

twomanyfrogsinabox · 18/11/2024 13:54

It's likely 40% has already been paid in tax so another 40% in IHT is 80% in total.

Except it really isn’t.

The vast majority of the 4% of estates that pay IHT are only in that bracket because of unearned capital gain from house price increases.

On which no tax at all has been paid. **

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:17

Cosyblankets · 21/11/2024 13:12

You have an allowance for IHT each of 325k.
If one of you dies first and their estate is below that then the remaining allowance is transferred to the other. So say you die leaving 300k there's 25k allowance left to transfer so your husband's allowance then becomes 350k
If you both die together the total amount is 650k so it makes no difference.

A solicitor recently did probate for a relative of mine who was widowed almost 30 years ago and he wanted the original marriage certificate in case he needed the allowance transferring over

It's very depressing.

Cosyblankets · 21/11/2024 13:18

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:17

It's very depressing.

What is?
I'm merely pointing out that you said they'd pay IHT if you died together and this is wrong.

BIossomtoes · 21/11/2024 13:20

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:17

It's very depressing.

What’s depressing about it? If our kids are unhappy with a share of a £1 million tax free windfall, our parenting has gone badly wrong.

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:31

Cosyblankets · 21/11/2024 13:18

What is?
I'm merely pointing out that you said they'd pay IHT if you died together and this is wrong.

It's depressing that you can't pass everything you worked hard for on to your loved ones.

BIossomtoes · 21/11/2024 13:34

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:31

It's depressing that you can't pass everything you worked hard for on to your loved ones.

I’m far from depressed. Ours are getting plenty and they won’t be moaning about it either, they’ll be grateful.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 13:58

Rollercoaster1920 · 21/11/2024 12:42

@cardibach "There. Are. No. IHT changes. Except. For. Agricultural. Relief."
Did you miss that DC pension pots are now included?

That's the but that I think will unfairly hit single parents, not in final salary schemes, living in the SE, that die from approx age of 55 to 75.

Your pension is supposed to support you in a good life in retirement, not be a tax free way to help your offspring after you die.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 13:59

Clavinova · 21/11/2024 12:59

Non-agricultural businesses and inherited pensions are also affected;

Changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) proposed during the Autumn Budget 2024 include significant changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR). Pensions will no longer be outside the scope of IHT and liable to 40%.

https://www.rossmartin.co.uk/autumn-budget-2024/8058-inheritance-tax-iht-autumn-budget-2024

Fair point. But people were talking as though there had been massive changes to what they could leave their kids.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 14:02

caringcarer · 21/11/2024 13:31

It's depressing that you can't pass everything you worked hard for on to your loved ones.

Lots of people can because though they have worked hard they haven’t amassed more than a million quid. The narrative that we’d all be rolling in it if we only worked hard enough pisses me right off.
Plus you haven’t worked hard for the property price increase.
Plus a million (or half a million even if you are single) tax free lump sum to your kids, plus most of anything above that after tax is something they should be cheering about, not depressed.

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 14:11

The best way to avoid IHT is to move somewhere that doesn’t have it.
or
Plan well in advance, but that in itself can be tricky especially if you are passing property over.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 15:19

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 14:11

The best way to avoid IHT is to move somewhere that doesn’t have it.
or
Plan well in advance, but that in itself can be tricky especially if you are passing property over.

Or - just let the estate pay it so your descendants get to live in a functional country with good services.

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:27

cardibach · 21/11/2024 15:19

Or - just let the estate pay it so your descendants get to live in a functional country with good services.

As it’s a persons money they can do what they like with it.
Hence move or take measures to protect it whilst they are alive.

If everyone in the UK had to pay it starting at £1, fair enough.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 15:29

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:27

As it’s a persons money they can do what they like with it.
Hence move or take measures to protect it whilst they are alive.

If everyone in the UK had to pay it starting at £1, fair enough.

Actually I think I probably agree we should do as some countries do and start it lower and graduate it.
However I don’t think it’s unreasonable for a person to pay tax on a sudden windfall of over £500k (or £1million if their parents were married).
Edit - and it’s only a proportion of money over the threshold, not all of it.

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:36

cardibach · 21/11/2024 15:29

Actually I think I probably agree we should do as some countries do and start it lower and graduate it.
However I don’t think it’s unreasonable for a person to pay tax on a sudden windfall of over £500k (or £1million if their parents were married).
Edit - and it’s only a proportion of money over the threshold, not all of it.

Edited

Haven’t we discussed this on another thread @cardibach 😀

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:37

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:36

Haven’t we discussed this on another thread @cardibach 😀

As an aside
Its not a tax on a persons sudden windfall
As the Govn clearly notes it’s a tax on the estate of the person who has died.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 15:49

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:37

As an aside
Its not a tax on a persons sudden windfall
As the Govn clearly notes it’s a tax on the estate of the person who has died.

We may have discussed it before.
Technically it’s a tax on the estate, yes, but the owner is dead. The people it affects are the beneficiaries so it’s fair to describe it as a tax on their windfall.

BIossomtoes · 21/11/2024 15:59

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 15:37

As an aside
Its not a tax on a persons sudden windfall
As the Govn clearly notes it’s a tax on the estate of the person who has died.

Those two things amount to the same thing.

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 16:06

BIossomtoes · 21/11/2024 15:59

Those two things amount to the same thing.

Technically if it’s a tax on the person(s)who are inheriting then it would be classed as income for tax purposes and each individual would be taxed separately on their share.
So it’s not the same.

cardibach · 21/11/2024 16:26

StandingSideBySide · 21/11/2024 16:06

Technically if it’s a tax on the person(s)who are inheriting then it would be classed as income for tax purposes and each individual would be taxed separately on their share.
So it’s not the same.

It wouldn’t have to be. There could be rules about unearned or inherited income. Either way, in practice it’s a tax on the windfall the beneficiaries get because the deceased is…well…deceased.

Jostuki · 02/12/2024 13:28

Labour MP Henry Tufnell’s family conveniently transferred ownership of their farm into a company and set up a trust for his children just 20 days before Labour announced a new 20% inheritance tax on agricultural assets over £1 million. This move could save them 4 million while ordinary farmers face the full force of the tax.
The timing is too perfect to be coincidence. It reeks of insider knowledge and corruption It shows the hypocrisy of Labour politicians who bend the rules for their own gain.

cardibach · 02/12/2024 13:42

Jostuki · 02/12/2024 13:28

Labour MP Henry Tufnell’s family conveniently transferred ownership of their farm into a company and set up a trust for his children just 20 days before Labour announced a new 20% inheritance tax on agricultural assets over £1 million. This move could save them 4 million while ordinary farmers face the full force of the tax.
The timing is too perfect to be coincidence. It reeks of insider knowledge and corruption It shows the hypocrisy of Labour politicians who bend the rules for their own gain.

Those farms can do the same. It’s not something g that needed to be done before the law - and in fact didn’t Clarkson say he’d already done it too? Doubt he had advance notice. It’s really not corrupt even if he did know, because anyone can do it at any time. There’s no rule bending here.
And again, it’s only £1 million if it’s a single farmer with no residence on the farm. For most it’s closer to £3 million.

StandingSideBySide · 02/12/2024 13:42

Looks like Rachel Reeves is being investigated as well on tipping off Mr Tufnell.

Tufnells tax avoidance move should be cancelled and he should have to stand down as MP.
What a disgrace

cardibach · 02/12/2024 13:43

StandingSideBySide · 02/12/2024 13:42

Looks like Rachel Reeves is being investigated as well on tipping off Mr Tufnell.

Tufnells tax avoidance move should be cancelled and he should have to stand down as MP.
What a disgrace

It’s nonsense. It’s not something that needed to be done ahead of the law. The desperation to discredit Labour is really sad to see.