Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To support UK Farmers

1000 replies

TheHateIsNotGood · 16/11/2024 17:24

And due to KS's inability to face them in Wales today they are now thinking of going on strike. Because the govt are being too stubborn to reconsider how they apply IHT on working family farms. By all means close the loophole that allows the 'landed gentry' to take advantage of the agricultural exception but not with so blunt an instrument.

I was hoping to add a post to an existing thread but there isn't one despite it being headline news today.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
StandingSideBySide · 17/11/2024 04:37

hitheree · 17/11/2024 00:18

Couldn't agree with you more.

They see farm land and ping!!! Ooooh solar village! Yay! (Insert money clapping cymbals)

You’ve hit the nail on the head there.
Angela Raynor pulled a plannning application 3 days before the planning meeting because there were 700 objections and the planners recommended it for refusal because of no schools, gps, infrastructure, inadequate substations so no electricity, access issues ie single lane roads for thousands of new properties. She pulled it because she intends to override the planners decision and to completely ignore the people…
And yes….it will be on current farmland.
We are also having to deal with applications for solar farms on protected land

They don’t care.
They will be able to boast about hitting their targets and making new jobs all in the short term whilst in the long term we have higher food prices because farmers will have less and less land

Alphaalga · 17/11/2024 05:05

notanothernamechange24 · 17/11/2024 03:12

Oh dear @ARealitycheck you really haven't got a fucking clue! I'm embarrassed for you!!!

Where did you get your "clues" then, the five(?) farmers you actually know or the thousands you obviously don't and didn't exit poll?🙄

WhitegreeNcandle · 17/11/2024 06:27

user1467300911 · 17/11/2024 01:14

I think the issue is a larger one actually. The UK should incentivise family businesses to continue to be passed down rather than encouraging people to cash out before they die. It allows for long term planning and stability.

Germany for example, has inheritance taxes but there are reliefs for family businesses that go up to 100% if certain conditions are met, such as the heir continuing the business for at least seven years, with other conditions around payroll etc, to avoid sham business continuity just to avoid tax.

This sounds really interesting. I agree with you that’s it’s symptomatic of a much bigger issue. We are going to be encouraging people to sell up, spend money and not be investing for future wealth. Taking away incentives to work is only going to be a bad thing in the future I think.

WhitegreeNcandle · 17/11/2024 06:32

ARealitycheck · 17/11/2024 02:49

In that case, would farmers accept that the farmhouse becomes seperate for the business. But rather than get it and the heating, lighting etc free gratis, they paid that market value into the farm business from their wages? As an example, large farm house in the cotswolds, what will it be in rent a month... £1k? More? Utilities, Insurance and council tax etc monthly...probably same again and more. All of a sudden there is £24k taxable income gone into the business. Cake and eat it comes to mind.

They don’t get it free. A portion of the expenses are allowable for business purposes. If I remember rightly for example we claim 20% of our electric as business use for example. Similar for other utilities. Insurance is separated out to farm and house holds. So our farm buildings are insured by the business but our household contents insurance is a private drawing.

I Do agree we don’t pay rent but are there any other working environments where you are on call 365 days a year with regular unsocial hours and days. We don’t expect it of farm workers.

WhitegreeNcandle · 17/11/2024 06:43

Not sure I’ve ever seen a dairy farm with a subsidy of 500k. The other thing Labour did was pull the final bit of BPS funding. No warning, just pulled it. The new schemes to replace it are completely different and are not money for nothing. By the time you cost out the scheme it doesn’t often pay the NLW for the person doing the job.

To the poster who suggesting a dairy farmer could be producing 240k worth of milk with his 5 or 6 men. You do realise that the staffing cost alone of employing 5 full time farm workers would be in the regions of 150k. On top of that there’s pension, NI and housing the said employees because the work most weekends and start at 4am. The cost
of housing them could easily be another 50k. So you haven’t made a penny in profit and you haven’t even thought about 1 single other cost.

Pat888 · 17/11/2024 06:44

notanothernamechange24 · 17/11/2024 04:12

@ARealitycheck you're not understanding what I said at all! Go back and reread!

The landowners ARE NOT MAKING A PROFIT OFF THE LAND the tenant is!!! The only benefit of the land is when they die and it's passed on.

It literally gives farmers a foot hold on the farming ladder.
I personally know a farmer who rented land for about 15 years off someone who bought it for IHT purposes. He charged next to no rent. Giving farmer chance to earn a decent living. Then when things changed for landowner he sold the land direct to farmer at a fair price. Without it the farmer would never have got going. And he sure as hell wouldn't have been able to buy land.

But your example is of a kindly old person selling the land to his tenant at a fair rent.
The investment companies with many foreign investors are in it to make money and to protect their money. A single wind turbine can make you £100,000 a year, 10 and you are making a million. They aren’t going to sell land at a fair price to anyone - think of Thames water and it’s foreign in estors.
Reducing IHT avoidance is a good thing.

Anyone who complains about this or winter fuel allowance cut should be obliged to explain what SHOULD be taxed instead.

WhitegreeNcandle · 17/11/2024 06:55

Pat888 · 17/11/2024 06:44

But your example is of a kindly old person selling the land to his tenant at a fair rent.
The investment companies with many foreign investors are in it to make money and to protect their money. A single wind turbine can make you £100,000 a year, 10 and you are making a million. They aren’t going to sell land at a fair price to anyone - think of Thames water and it’s foreign in estors.
Reducing IHT avoidance is a good thing.

Anyone who complains about this or winter fuel allowance cut should be obliged to explain what SHOULD be taxed instead.

It does happen though. My father benefited greatly from a local landowner who he farmed the land for for a number of years (at a very decent rent). When the owner died it was written into his will that my father had first refusal to buy at a specified discount off the market valued.

That gentlemen (which is what he was) changed my family tree.

Big multinational conglomerates don’t behave like this.

ArabellaScott · 17/11/2024 06:58

StandingSideBySide · 17/11/2024 03:55

Food security is more important.
( Although I’d rather see more arable farming as it’s a more efficient use of land )

I do not agree with IHT on farmers including large farms and rented out farm land.
We can’t have land sold off to pay IHT, we need it to feed the country.
Of note this inheritance tax will affect all of us if we lose our farmers because of it, which we will

Arable requires the right kind of geography. Many areas of the UK don't have that, and hill farm sheep are sometimes the best use of land for food production.

ThisGreatHazelKoala · 17/11/2024 07:14

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

OMG, not Blackpool! You’re right, they’re all gentry plutocrats.

calabria5 · 17/11/2024 08:00

To be honest, lots of people have to pay inheritance tax on eg. a terraced house in London. It's not as if they have the option of selling off bits of land. Who does have 100% job security for themselves and their children?

I see a marked shift towards vegetarianism so I don't think it's a bad thing at all if the meat industry becomes a thing of the past. Sooner the better. It's a horrendous industry and you can't really expect people to feel sorry for those who make a 'living' sending god knows how many animals to slaughter, generation after generation. Yes you could say they are only responding to demand, but less beef / chicken / pig farms means higher prices and then people will eat less meat - so less animal suffering and a healthier, happier population.

Personally, I think the govt should tax the meat industry heavily, alongside blocking cheap meat imports, alongside subsidies to those switching to sustainable crop production and / or rewilding.

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:02

ARealitycheck · 16/11/2024 23:49

The same worries every other business owner in the Country worries about but get no subsidy or tax relief.

But other business owners use tax planning to mitigate this. We did but ours was taken away.
Other business owners generate enough money to pay the tax. We don’t!

PenGold · 17/11/2024 08:02

ARealitycheck · 17/11/2024 03:02

I'd guess any number of businesses have similar money tied up in their tools and equipment.

Have you any comprehension just as an employed sparky, plumber, joiner and especially mechanic they have tied up in hand tools just to go work for somebody else. That is before we look at the more specialist equipment the employer has.

Got a garage and do MOT's. expect to spend iro £10k annually just to keep up to date with the latest dvsa directive. That's on top of the initial circa £30k investment to get a testing lane and associated requirements in place.

Do mechanical repairs. Specialist tools and diagnostic equipment. Again £10k annually for an average garage and that's on top of the initial tooling purchase. The building, office and viewing station. Anything from eg £100k to any figure you could imagine dependent on location. A garage owner could easily have a million in assets that is worth diddly squat unless somebody buys it. Even as a limited company, if he tries to take money from the company on retirement, he is taxed on that.

This is the reason so many people now think farming should shoulder their share of financing the Country.

This latest post about the ordinary running costs of every business demonstrates your complete lack of understanding of the subject or potential impact of what is being discussed, despite the multiple posters trying to reason with you. I don’t even have the words to outline how spectacularly you are missing the point and at this stage of the discussion it’s starting to seem very calculated indeed. I’ll leave you to it now for my own sanity.

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:05

PenGold · 17/11/2024 08:02

This latest post about the ordinary running costs of every business demonstrates your complete lack of understanding of the subject or potential impact of what is being discussed, despite the multiple posters trying to reason with you. I don’t even have the words to outline how spectacularly you are missing the point and at this stage of the discussion it’s starting to seem very calculated indeed. I’ll leave you to it now for my own sanity.

She makes a very good point. Belittling an opposing view which is held quite widely isn’t an argument.

CurlewKate · 17/11/2024 08:08

@BetteDavisChin "Inheritance Tax is irrelevant to most of us, then narrow it down further to farmers ..."
And narrow it down further to very rich farmers....

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:08

potatocakesinprogress · 16/11/2024 23:42

How do you think all the other businesses cope that have to pay inheritance tax on their family assets? Like family-run B&Bs where their business is also their home? They don't have land to sell, it's their whole business.

Maybe be grateful about how much you've saved over centuries of not paying the same tax as everyone else instead of whining the gravy train is being balanced out.

You can't grow a decent strawberry and you burn crops because you can't get the staff to harvest them, so where's the big loss exactly.

Edited

Be grateful about how much we have saved?
We do pay tax like everyone else. We are not tax dodgers.
Can’t be many b&b’s that would end up with a million pound plus inheritance tax bill though. I may be wrong on that though cos I never actually get to go on holiday and see any b&b’s because I’m too busy farming.
Other businesses usually earn enough to pay the tax & can plan for it.
Farmers don’t earn enough to pay the sums involved and have had the the tax planning options we had taken away.
Are you Rachel Reeves?
Do you understand anything about farming?
The supermarkets will have empty shelves soon enough

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:10

calabria5 · 17/11/2024 08:00

To be honest, lots of people have to pay inheritance tax on eg. a terraced house in London. It's not as if they have the option of selling off bits of land. Who does have 100% job security for themselves and their children?

I see a marked shift towards vegetarianism so I don't think it's a bad thing at all if the meat industry becomes a thing of the past. Sooner the better. It's a horrendous industry and you can't really expect people to feel sorry for those who make a 'living' sending god knows how many animals to slaughter, generation after generation. Yes you could say they are only responding to demand, but less beef / chicken / pig farms means higher prices and then people will eat less meat - so less animal suffering and a healthier, happier population.

Personally, I think the govt should tax the meat industry heavily, alongside blocking cheap meat imports, alongside subsidies to those switching to sustainable crop production and / or rewilding.

Yh re the meat industry- the vast majority can’t afford to buy farm shop organically locally and ethically reared meat. Farm shops don’t give a shit about the majority and are just geared to the very wealthy few.Most family's are having to reduce meat consumption hugely due to the cost even for cheap cruelly produced meat. Many need to cut consumption for health reasons. Then there is the massive damage to the environment that meat production causes….

PenGold · 17/11/2024 08:10

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:05

She makes a very good point. Belittling an opposing view which is held quite widely isn’t an argument.

Luckily I have 18 pages of ‘argument’ to fall back on, thanks. I’ve already spent far too many hours of my life trying to have a sensible conversation with that poster.

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:11

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:08

Be grateful about how much we have saved?
We do pay tax like everyone else. We are not tax dodgers.
Can’t be many b&b’s that would end up with a million pound plus inheritance tax bill though. I may be wrong on that though cos I never actually get to go on holiday and see any b&b’s because I’m too busy farming.
Other businesses usually earn enough to pay the tax & can plan for it.
Farmers don’t earn enough to pay the sums involved and have had the the tax planning options we had taken away.
Are you Rachel Reeves?
Do you understand anything about farming?
The supermarkets will have empty shelves soon enough

Well that will be mostly due to the Brexit you all voted for even though you enjoyed massive subsidies from the EU.

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:16

ARealitycheck · 16/11/2024 23:18

You do realise in the majority of cases of snow clearance it is done by contractors who then bill the council?
To answer the who grows the crop etc...Well who takes the subsidy to grow the crop etc?

Yes I do realise that. I hope you realise that up & down the country farmers also do this.
The subsidies were paid in the past so food could be bought by the consumer cheaply.
Simple as that.
You need to educate yourself, agriculture in this country is on its knees. The changes the government have made do not benefit anyone. Prices will go up & there will be supply issues. Not good for anyone.

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:16

If farmers want support they should have gone about things in a completely different way long ago-pushing anti EU propaganda and voting for Brexit even though it was not in the best interest for the majority, stopping locals from enjoying green spaces by denying Right to Roam, doing nothing for local communities, massively over pricing farm shops…

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:17

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:16

Yes I do realise that. I hope you realise that up & down the country farmers also do this.
The subsidies were paid in the past so food could be bought by the consumer cheaply.
Simple as that.
You need to educate yourself, agriculture in this country is on its knees. The changes the government have made do not benefit anyone. Prices will go up & there will be supply issues. Not good for anyone.

There are already supply issues thanks to Brexit which you all campaigned for.

ExtraOnions · 17/11/2024 08:17

Maybe farmers want to stop poisoning the rivers as well

Agriculture is the leading cause of river pollution in the UK … stop killing our rivers off

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:19

Yep poisoning of rivers, over use of pesticides, selling off and building on green spaces when it suits…

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:22

As I said before you reap what you sow. So many farmers aren’t reliant on public services like the rest of us. Better state schools, healthcare and services are drastically needed. I’d rather cry about that than millionaire inheritance tax.

Farmersweeklyreader · 17/11/2024 08:24

G1nT1n · 17/11/2024 08:17

There are already supply issues thanks to Brexit which you all campaigned for.

We certainly did not vote for brexit.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread