to think this should not be allowed

[PomPomBearGrylls]

when a film company thinks it is acceptable to make fun and money from a poor little girl's suffering under the guise of 'entertainment'😥
Shannon Mathews the movie

It's disgusting. Poor Shannon.

There was no sexual abuse of anyone!
Well done for commenting on something you obviously know nothing about. The only noncery was Craig downloading some dodgy pics off the web. But why let facts get in the way of being offended haha.

Yeah because a nonce living with a little girl and drugging her for months on end wouldn't abuse her at all, would he? Oh I've got a bridge to sell you...

There's and itv drama with Sheridan Smith about it too. Don't see the controversy about that.

@KendraTheVampyrSlayer 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

I seemed to have that missed that part in the trial. Are you sure you are talking about Shannon Matthews?

Alright hun, get back to your gin, or maybe step away from it!

"He's got the wrong Shannon Matthews mate"

Absolutely disgusting.
A musical is meant to be fun entertainment by its very nature.
Nothing fun or entertaining here about what happened to that poor girl.
I mean, if we are stooping this low why stop there? Why not make musicals about other horrible abuse stories and tragedy’s. Because it’s sick. That’s why not.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/nov/20/shannon-drugs-court-trial

@CsideMilf

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk/2008/nov/20/shannon-drugs-court-trial

Karen Matthews started a relationship with Craig Meghan when he was 17 and she was 27. Images of CSA was found in the home at the time of the investigation.

Michael Donovan was his uncle. He kept Shannon drugged and leashed in the base of a divan bed, at Karen's behest.

Yes, I'm sure. Are you telling me a man who wanks off to children being abused wouldn't abuse a child he lives with?

Seems like a thinly veiled attempt at accusing me of being a nonce? Didn't realise we resorting to insults 😂

@BarryGw your terminology is sickening. What the fuck is wrong with you?!

No. I think they were just saying it was never mentioned anywhere throughout the court case or subsequent reports. You seen to be confusing your opinions with facts. But then again, it's MumsNet so.....

@BarryGwy

You might want to Google before you post. And I've done you a favour and reported the post where you use the sickening term for CSA.

This is around the third time you've used "lol" or a laughing emoji on a thread about a girl who was drugged, possibly sexually abused and traumatised by her mother and uncle at the age of 9! You're either a nonce or completely unhinged.

I've seen or read nothing about her being drugged for 20 months

You seem to be confused about how to use Google. The article I linked to is literally the first one that comes up. The title says she was drugged for up to 2 years!

It sounds as though it’s in very bad taste, but who would you want to be in charge of “allowing” or “disallowing” it?

& so that makes it fact, as you make assumptions. I’m sure that would have been included in the trial if it had.

Honestly I wouldn’t know, as I don’t need my hard drive checked.

You seem very trusting. I'm sure you'd happily leave your children with a man who had been convicted of downloading images of CSA?

They aren’t a very welcoming bunch here.

Ban everything in case it causes offence to someone. Down with this sort of thing!!

Hey if they don’t want to see it, don’t rent it, or buy it & just move on & get back to Bake Off & Davina McCalls menopause docs.

As stated, it didn’t come up in court, just your mind!