I've sent the following letter to the Director of Children's Services.
We are writing as the parents of Child to inform you that he does not have a suitable school place, and to request that the local authority (“LA”) arrange either suitable education within his allocated school or provide alternative education in accordance with its duty under section 19 of the Education Act 1996.
The LA was made aware of Child requiring suitable and full time education on the 8th November 2024 and it clearly states in the statutory guidance entitled: ‘Arranging education for children who cannot attend school because of health needs’. (page 7) that LAs should provide a suitable and full time education as soon as it is clear that the child will be away from school for 15 days or more, whether consecutive or cumulative, and should do so at the latest by the sixth day of the absence. Note that today is the 18th November 2024.
At present the school, XX Primary School, that the LA has allocated Child is not suitable. Child’s Special Educational Needs and disability are not being accommodated by the LA in their consideration of what is a suitable education for Child. This is discrimination by the LA under the Equality Act 2010 as well as a failure to ensure they fulfil their duty under section 19 of the Education Act 1996.
The LA have stated that they have fulfilled their duty by allocating Child a place at XX Primary School however, I understand that under section 19 of the Education Act 1996, the LA has a statutory duty to secure suitable, full-time alternative education for those children of compulsory school age who, by reason of illness, exclusion or otherwise, may not for any period receive suitable education unless such arrangements are made for them.
Child has special educational needs and I have attached his former school’s One Plan, Risk Reduction Plan and Accommodation Requests with this letter documentation which confirms their special educational needs and the special educational provision they had been receiving through SEN Support at his former school. Child has also already exhausted the use of IPRA funding and has been known to the LA since 2022. No support has yet gone far enough to accommodate his needs in a mainstream school. At his former school, the accommodations could not be delivered for Child which resulted in a series of suspensions directly linked to his disability and his unmet need. The LA was made aware of this history when seeking a school provision again, yet the LA did not make XX aware of these matters.
XX advised the LA that they cannot accommodate Child’s SEN but the LA stated the school must take him. The school have stated that they will not be able to safeguard Child or other children and that Child’s SEN accommodations are in direct conflict with the school’s “non-negotiables” and incompatible with the efficient education of other children. In the Deputy Head Teacher’s own words, “the LA is setting him up to fail”. The LA has not fulfilled its duty as XX is not a suitable place of education for Child.
It is not that mainstream education is necessarily unsuitable for Child but that there is an incompatibility with the education of other children in the school and that no provisions are being provided to help Child receive a suitable education. XX have stated that they can only accommodate Child for 1hour a day; this is not a full time education.
It is necessary for the LA to ensure the education Child is entitled to is arranged by the LA to be suitable and full time as set out under section 19 of the Education Act 1996. I understand LA must provide this education for Child immediately. If the LA believes that this could be possible at XX then there is a requirement to put a plan forward by the LA on how the LA can support the school to accommodate Child’s SEN. Currently XX are receiving no assistance by the LA.
There are numerous Case Law that set out how the LA should be ensuring a suitable education is being provided for a child, such as Child, and I want to draw your attention to some of them below;
R v East Sussex County Council, ex parte Tandy / Inre T (A Minor) [1998] 884
R. (on the application of Y) v Croydon LBC [2015] EWHC 3033 (Admin); [2016] E.L.R. 138
R (LB) v Surrey County Council [2022] EWHC 772 (Admin)
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v SU [2010] UKUT 406 (AAC)
TM v Hounslow [2009] EWCA Civ 859
I therefore request that the LA carry out their duty by ensuring that Child can have access to a suitable and full time education by either assisting XX in accommodating Child’s SEN and disability or by arranging other alternative education.
Please respond to this letter within five working days, to advise of the arrangements for Child’s suitable education. If a suitable place of education is not agreed, I shall begin the next stages towards a Compliance Notice and then, if required, a Judicial Review.
Yours faithfully,
Mr & Mrs Crumplesock