I am overall quite confused.
The employer NI will definitely hurt people immediately. DH works in a company of a few hundred people and he is involved in people's pay/performance reviews. They were all done and agreed, but hadn't been given out. Someone senior put them all on hold recently due to the potential for employer NI increase. Now that that's happening, the pay reviews will be cut to try and mitigate the NI increase. But these people won't ever know that they were going to get a bit more.
I can see that employer NI doesn't (on the face of it) hurt the average (wo)man in the street. So most of us are not going to be sitting cursing over it. But I think there is a minority of people that it's going to badly hurt. The private school issue will hurt a minority - 7%. The farming inheritance issue will hurt a minority.
I am wondering whether Reeves is hurting small minorities, safe in the knowledge that the (wo)man in the street won't care and neither will most of their friends, so Labour's popularity won't decline.
Personally, I would like to have seen 1% on the higher rate of income tax. It would have been shouldered by millions, rather than by minorities. It just seems a bit more honest, rather than all these little bits.
The non doms - time to do a runner? The stuff doesn't come in for a while.
The stamp duty on 2nd/rental homes? I saw a DM article saying that there are 21 renters wanting each property that comes on the market. This has been my experience. DB tried to rent a property near his work - nothing. Totally impossible. My DS is a student and will be trying to rent next year so I'm quite concerned about that.
Aside from this, it's also become popular to call things "loopholes" when they were actually exemptions for good reason.
I can't really see the other side of the budget - mega mega spending. I just don't understand where the money is really coming from. This is what I'm confused about.