Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How would you fix the NHS?

969 replies

PinkFruitbat · 21/10/2024 07:37

The Government is asking for ideas on how to fix the NHS.

https://change.nhs.uk/en-GB/

What would you do to fix it?

https://change.nhs.uk/en-GB

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Doin · 15/03/2025 20:06

Eu style social insurance

taxguru · 15/03/2025 20:10

TrixieFatell · 15/03/2025 13:00

That the NHS is under one system. One example is that if we have a woman from another trust, or who has been booked by another trust, we have to repeat their blood tests even if they have had them done already by the different trust. So the woman had to be inconvenienced, there's the cost of the blood tests and the staff taking the tests, just to get information that is already there. We also can't access notes from other trusts including scans so it takes time to get these. It's so frustrating. These are small things but it baffles me that we don't have in place one system all trust use.

The same can happen in different hospitals within the same trust. When my OH finished his first course of chemotherapy at our local hospital, he was referred to a more specialist hospital in the next town, same NHS county trust. First thing the specialist consultant at the other hospital wanted was a full suite of all the tests again, i.e. MRI scan, skeletal x-ray and bone marrow sample - all had been done at the first hospital 3 months earlier but he said he had no access to the results/scans, etc. All he had in front of him was a two paragraph referral letter from the haematologist in hospital one and he said he couldn't access any test results, history of what drugs had been given, nor the monthly blood test readings showing the effect of the first course of drugs - he said the two hospitals used different systems - just 20 miles away, same county, same NHS trust. The cost of having to repeat those test was a ridiculous waste, not to mention me and OH having to make 4 more special journeys to the other hospital to have all the tests done (again). Why the hell aren't the computer systems linked within the same trust, and if they can't manage that, why the hell can't they just send the results in paper (or email) from one hospital to another. Paying a sodding taxi to courier the paper file would have been cheaper than doing all the tests again!

taxguru · 15/03/2025 20:11

Toddlerteaplease · 15/03/2025 14:57

Cut down on middle management, and have pharmacy with the same shifts as nurses. So patients seem on ward round at 8am don’t have to wait for the pharmacist to start at gone 9am. Or 10 at week ends. Freeing up beds quickly.

Far too sensible for the NHS.

taxguru · 15/03/2025 20:15

Alexandra2001 · 15/03/2025 19:47

Its about someone who has done this sort of thing for living & sees the problems day in day out vs your layman's opinion....

A pharmacy delay is 7hrs, maybe a day, compared to weeks to get a double care package.... or wait for a none existent Care Home bed.... or have a family refuse point blank to have their Mum/Dad back home until a ramp is in place or hand rails...

In the cases of me, oh, MIL, father, etc., who've been languishing in a hospital bed over a weekend, there was no care package needed. All were being discharged home to be looked after by spouse/family. All we were waiting for was the discharge drugs and someone to tick the boxes in the NHS's own paperwork to approve discharge. Fair enough, there's no urgency if a care package involving carers/care home is needed and that's going to take weeks, but in my case, we're talking about simple home discharges where there's no need to "bed block" all weekend at all.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 15/03/2025 20:16

taxguru · 15/03/2025 20:10

The same can happen in different hospitals within the same trust. When my OH finished his first course of chemotherapy at our local hospital, he was referred to a more specialist hospital in the next town, same NHS county trust. First thing the specialist consultant at the other hospital wanted was a full suite of all the tests again, i.e. MRI scan, skeletal x-ray and bone marrow sample - all had been done at the first hospital 3 months earlier but he said he had no access to the results/scans, etc. All he had in front of him was a two paragraph referral letter from the haematologist in hospital one and he said he couldn't access any test results, history of what drugs had been given, nor the monthly blood test readings showing the effect of the first course of drugs - he said the two hospitals used different systems - just 20 miles away, same county, same NHS trust. The cost of having to repeat those test was a ridiculous waste, not to mention me and OH having to make 4 more special journeys to the other hospital to have all the tests done (again). Why the hell aren't the computer systems linked within the same trust, and if they can't manage that, why the hell can't they just send the results in paper (or email) from one hospital to another. Paying a sodding taxi to courier the paper file would have been cheaper than doing all the tests again!

It’s senseless waste like that, replicated all over that we’re all paying for and that’s clogging up the system.

JenniferBooth · 15/03/2025 20:17

Alexandra2001 · 15/03/2025 19:47

Its about someone who has done this sort of thing for living & sees the problems day in day out vs your layman's opinion....

A pharmacy delay is 7hrs, maybe a day, compared to weeks to get a double care package.... or wait for a none existent Care Home bed.... or have a family refuse point blank to have their Mum/Dad back home until a ramp is in place or hand rails...

Well there is a reason for that. My dad died back in October after having an accident on the stairs because he was weak from prostate cancer
In my parents case they didnt want the adaptations but the reason that people refuse is because of accidents like this.
Maybe family members dont want to risk a life changing injury by helping someone with limited mobility up and down the stairs.

Will the NHS AND benefits system be there for them if they do Pffft

endofthelinefinally · 16/03/2025 03:02

Cornercandy · 22/10/2024 06:19

Another one - make the blood test, urine results to be seen by all doctors. I have heard of people having a routine blood test at their GPs then a couple of weeks later, at hospital, they want more blood tests and most of them are the same things that got tested on two weeks ago.

If just one or two more things need to be tested, just do a blood test on those. Especially if the other factors remain fairly constant. It would be cheaper and probably quicker to test one or two more things than the whole rigmarole each time.

This is a huge problem. I have regular blood monitoring because of meds I am on. I also have a yearly test ordered by a different consultant, same hospital, for something else. I have tried in vain to get both tests put on the same form so I can have just one appointment. It is such a waste of resources.

Alexandra2001 · 16/03/2025 07:28

JenniferBooth · 15/03/2025 20:17

Well there is a reason for that. My dad died back in October after having an accident on the stairs because he was weak from prostate cancer
In my parents case they didnt want the adaptations but the reason that people refuse is because of accidents like this.
Maybe family members dont want to risk a life changing injury by helping someone with limited mobility up and down the stairs.

Will the NHS AND benefits system be there for them if they do Pffft

I was not being critical of these families. Looking after someone who is frail is very very hard work, many of these people should not be discharged but we don't have the staff or Hospital beds for longer stays.

I was answering the PP who said that its all down to Pharmacy delays, the main problem is care packages, lack of care home beds and also funding decisions... these are keeping people in Hospital for weeks or on a separate short stay ward away from the main hospital but that is a huge cost, also needs staff.

I'm sorry about your Dad.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 16/03/2025 07:31

Alexandra2001 · 16/03/2025 07:28

I was not being critical of these families. Looking after someone who is frail is very very hard work, many of these people should not be discharged but we don't have the staff or Hospital beds for longer stays.

I was answering the PP who said that its all down to Pharmacy delays, the main problem is care packages, lack of care home beds and also funding decisions... these are keeping people in Hospital for weeks or on a separate short stay ward away from the main hospital but that is a huge cost, also needs staff.

I'm sorry about your Dad.

No one is saying it’s all down to pharmacy delays.

You choose to read it that way.

TimTamTime · 16/03/2025 07:38

endofthelinefinally · 16/03/2025 03:02

This is a huge problem. I have regular blood monitoring because of meds I am on. I also have a yearly test ordered by a different consultant, same hospital, for something else. I have tried in vain to get both tests put on the same form so I can have just one appointment. It is such a waste of resources.

The problem with saying 'just make it visible across all sites' is that actually that would require a massive IT project - they tried, spent millions then abandoned it.

Pharmacy hours - we can't get pharmacists to cover current day shifts! There is a real shortage and trying to force people to work late wouldn't help.

Also - inconvenience to the patients is not a cost to the NHS. It's annoying and frustrating sure, but not an expense. Running clinics out of hours or on a weekend so you don't have to take time off work is financially idiotic- healthcare professional & receptionist overtime is a direct cost to the NHS. Your employer should provide paid time off for healthcare needs, it's their problem not the NHS's.

Personally I think we need to move to an EU style co-pay insurance model. We also need central government to take decisions on what the NHS provides to remove postcode variation.

DeathNote11 · 16/03/2025 07:40

Performance related pay. No happy medium with NHS staff (both clinical & clerical), they're either incredible or shocking, with the former needing to work even harder to carry the latter. So many employees doing the bare minimum, waiting to retire. It's why I left the NHS & will never go back. Properly rewarded, supported & motivated staff will automatically improve efficiency & outcomes.

Gymbunny2025 · 16/03/2025 07:47

DeathNote11 · 16/03/2025 07:40

Performance related pay. No happy medium with NHS staff (both clinical & clerical), they're either incredible or shocking, with the former needing to work even harder to carry the latter. So many employees doing the bare minimum, waiting to retire. It's why I left the NHS & will never go back. Properly rewarded, supported & motivated staff will automatically improve efficiency & outcomes.

I think the risks with performance related pay/publishing results is that the ‘easy’ patients are cherry picked. The more complex/risky patients no one will want as it will affect their stats. So the people in most need will be in no mans land.

its already happening in a way- especially linked to surgery

Alexandra2001 · 16/03/2025 07:55

DeathNote11 · 16/03/2025 07:40

Performance related pay. No happy medium with NHS staff (both clinical & clerical), they're either incredible or shocking, with the former needing to work even harder to carry the latter. So many employees doing the bare minimum, waiting to retire. It's why I left the NHS & will never go back. Properly rewarded, supported & motivated staff will automatically improve efficiency & outcomes.

PRP...

Measured on what?

Performance review/targets are already here and it causes the exact opposite to what you want.

AE, among others, has targets etc, the easier patients dealt with, the ones with complex need, left... if you add in financial reward, the temptation to "cherry pick" will become greater... as said by the pp, then there is favouritism, who measures the measurers?

Equally, poor quality staff need dealing with too but why not address this as a separate issue?

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 16/03/2025 08:09

Your employer should provide paid time off for healthcare needs, it's their problem not the NHS's.

The employer and the patient are already paying for the NHS.

It’s the health service that should be taking into consideration the needs of the patients, not the other way round.

taxguru · 16/03/2025 08:39

endofthelinefinally · 16/03/2025 03:02

This is a huge problem. I have regular blood monitoring because of meds I am on. I also have a yearly test ordered by a different consultant, same hospital, for something else. I have tried in vain to get both tests put on the same form so I can have just one appointment. It is such a waste of resources.

OH has the same problem, but it's the same hospital and for the same treatment. He has his chemotherapy via the oncology dept who want a blood test a week before. He has a zometa infusion (part of the cancer treatment) in the day treatment unit and needs a blood test for that a week before in the day treatment unit. Guess what, each dept wants it's own blood test! They won't accept one blood test for both. That means he has to traipse to the hospital twice, often just a day or two apart depending on when each dept can give him a blood test appointment. Different depts seem to be working in isolation, even for treatment for the same condition. The amount of duplication of time, tests, etc is enormous and completely unnecessary. Too many separate fieffdoms.

taxguru · 16/03/2025 08:42

DeathNote11 · 16/03/2025 07:40

Performance related pay. No happy medium with NHS staff (both clinical & clerical), they're either incredible or shocking, with the former needing to work even harder to carry the latter. So many employees doing the bare minimum, waiting to retire. It's why I left the NHS & will never go back. Properly rewarded, supported & motivated staff will automatically improve efficiency & outcomes.

How will it be monitored? Targets and outcomes can be easily manipulated as we saw under Blair in the noughties where the NHS staff pulled trick after trick to "meet targets" on paper like changing a diagnosis, moving a patient between hospitals for no reason, fiddling ambulance response times by having single paramedics on motorbikes, fiddling A&E waiting times by creating separate holding areas between A&E and a ward, etc.

Kendodd · 16/03/2025 08:49

TimTamTime · 16/03/2025 07:38

The problem with saying 'just make it visible across all sites' is that actually that would require a massive IT project - they tried, spent millions then abandoned it.

Pharmacy hours - we can't get pharmacists to cover current day shifts! There is a real shortage and trying to force people to work late wouldn't help.

Also - inconvenience to the patients is not a cost to the NHS. It's annoying and frustrating sure, but not an expense. Running clinics out of hours or on a weekend so you don't have to take time off work is financially idiotic- healthcare professional & receptionist overtime is a direct cost to the NHS. Your employer should provide paid time off for healthcare needs, it's their problem not the NHS's.

Personally I think we need to move to an EU style co-pay insurance model. We also need central government to take decisions on what the NHS provides to remove postcode variation.

I think the problem with co-pay is that so many people would be exempt from paying the amount of money raised would be much less than the admin cost. If paying was based of prescriptions around 95% would be exempt.

Alexandra2001 · 16/03/2025 08:51

taxguru · 16/03/2025 08:42

How will it be monitored? Targets and outcomes can be easily manipulated as we saw under Blair in the noughties where the NHS staff pulled trick after trick to "meet targets" on paper like changing a diagnosis, moving a patient between hospitals for no reason, fiddling ambulance response times by having single paramedics on motorbikes, fiddling A&E waiting times by creating separate holding areas between A&E and a ward, etc.

Yes targets can be manipulated but public satisfaction in the NHS under Blair was over 70%...

Its now under 30%...

So whatever the issues in the 2000s, the NHS was working for most people, a 12 hour wait in AE was a rarity, now its the norm...

Ambulances turned up within target, we did not have 20 or 30 Ambulances treating patients outside AE and we did not have corridors & waiting areas turned into emergency "wards" to treat patients.

The Tories for whatever their reasons, wrecked the NHS.

Genevieva · 16/03/2025 08:52

Ban all DEI activity. One of my children was taught to swim by a specialist AIDs nurse who left because she became fed up with all her colleagues leaving her without support on the ward to attend endless DEI meetings during shifts. It was just a way of avoiding real work. She became fed up. Her 20+ years experience lost because of colleagues being allowed to avoid doing their actual job.

taxguru · 16/03/2025 08:53

TimTamTime · 16/03/2025 07:38

The problem with saying 'just make it visible across all sites' is that actually that would require a massive IT project - they tried, spent millions then abandoned it.

Pharmacy hours - we can't get pharmacists to cover current day shifts! There is a real shortage and trying to force people to work late wouldn't help.

Also - inconvenience to the patients is not a cost to the NHS. It's annoying and frustrating sure, but not an expense. Running clinics out of hours or on a weekend so you don't have to take time off work is financially idiotic- healthcare professional & receptionist overtime is a direct cost to the NHS. Your employer should provide paid time off for healthcare needs, it's their problem not the NHS's.

Personally I think we need to move to an EU style co-pay insurance model. We also need central government to take decisions on what the NHS provides to remove postcode variation.

It's false economy shutting down huge areas of the NHS in evenings, weekends and Friday afternoons. When patients are left bed blocking because they can't be discharged when the pharmacy is on skeleton staff and won't issue discharge meds.

Take scans/x-rays, etc., it's cheaper to run them a few more hours each week rather than have to buy additional equipment/new buildings etc to duplicate/triplicate the machinery to cope with demand when it's only open office hours. In the real economy, i.e. factories, etc., they don't build a new factory when demand increases - they make better use of the existing factory and ultimately a 24/7 shift system - yes, it costs more to pay overtime and then shift workers, but it's cheaper than buying a second factory, a second set of machinery etc.

In both pharmacies and radiology, etc., offer to pay enhanced rates for evening and weekend working and the staff WILL work. The managers just have to actually communicate between departments and top managers need to reallocate funds/resources between departments "for the greater good". As it is, there's no benefit for the radiology or pharmacy managers to bother paying more for overtime working as they won't see the benefit of the costs saved by reducing bed blocking. Same with social services who could save the NHS a fortune if they invested in more social care to reduce bed blocking. We need people above the management in individual departments and separate PS organisations to look at the bigger picture. Of course, if a pharmacy manager is only looking at their own budget, there's nothing in it for them to open longer, so they won't do it. It needs people above them (civil service and policitican level) to knock heads together and reallocate funding for the greater good.

As for the point about it being up to employers, No, it really isn't. The NHS isn't providing anything "free" to anyone. We're all paying for it, individuals are paying taxes, companies are paying taxes, all employers are paying employers NIC. We're ALL paying for the NHS. Part of it's problem is too many NHS staff with the attitude of "it;s free, so you should consider yourself lucky you're getting treatment at all". That attitude has to change because it is part of the problem!

Pat888 · 16/03/2025 09:07

Alexandra2001 · 16/03/2025 08:51

Yes targets can be manipulated but public satisfaction in the NHS under Blair was over 70%...

Its now under 30%...

So whatever the issues in the 2000s, the NHS was working for most people, a 12 hour wait in AE was a rarity, now its the norm...

Ambulances turned up within target, we did not have 20 or 30 Ambulances treating patients outside AE and we did not have corridors & waiting areas turned into emergency "wards" to treat patients.

The Tories for whatever their reasons, wrecked the NHS.

Well immigration took off during Tony Blair’s time as PM, we got nearly a million immigrants last year -there may have been less previously but 25 years of it is going to make a huge difference.

reesewithoutaspoon · 16/03/2025 09:17

Performance related pay would see surgeons refusing cases with higher risks or complex problems,
How do you measure nurses? They aren't hospitality workers. The smiley, pleasant nurse who doesn't make you mobilise post op is actually not doing her job over the nurse who insists you need to get up for your own good. Which one would patients score higher?
Sometimes patients are their own worst enemies by failing to comply with physio, medication regimes, dietary changes. Who's going to want to take the patients with worse outcomes if they risk a poor performance rating. Because the people who set the targets usually set them on outcomes or patient satisfaction.

Kendodd · 16/03/2025 09:20

To the person who mentioned paramedics on motorbikes. I think that was a brilliant idea given the traffic. As always though, it could turn out that it wasn't a brilliant idea, only when the data is analysed would we really know.

Gingernaut · 16/03/2025 10:20

Pat888 · 16/03/2025 09:07

Well immigration took off during Tony Blair’s time as PM, we got nearly a million immigrants last year -there may have been less previously but 25 years of it is going to make a huge difference.

Edited

Elderly population with more chronic diseases and requiring input from four or five different consultants, carers and district nurses

People with chronic or congenital issues, barely able to look after themselves, having children with the same or similar issues, requiring input from NICU, Social Services, Paediatrand their children's consultants and specialist nurses

Increasing incidence of alcohol and drug dependencies

The elderly parents of special needs adults dying off and leaving their children stranded, as they 'didn't like labels', didn't get any diagnosis, refused all help from social services and now their fully grown adult children are socially, economically and medically fucked, with social care straining at the seams

Many of the immigrants you blame for our problems are the medical and care staff used to look after our increasingly sick and helpless population

Pat888 · 16/03/2025 10:57

Are you saying these didn’t exist during T Blair’s prime ministership as that was what I was replying to.

Swipe left for the next trending thread