You have been on a thread that you started where you have been shown to be posting this misinformation.
Here, I will post this again for you.
LGB Alliance & the 7% misrepresentation
This is a statement released by LGB Alliance about that 7% statement made in court.
One particularly sticky myth is that only 7% of LGB Alliance supporters are lesbians. Here’s how that started:
We were delighted to be able to support Allison Bailey at her tribunal in the form of a witness statement to help prove that gender critical people are likely to be women and lesbians. As part of that we shared some numbers from our newsletter subscriber list.
We used Mailchimp to send our newsletter and when we set up our account in 2019 we added some subscriber questions which, as it turned out, provided us with ambiguous data.
We asked people whether they were lesbian, whether they were lesbian/gay or if they preferred not to say. The flaws being that we couldn’t tell whether those who ticked lesbian/gay were men or women and that none of the fields were compulsory – so many people skipped them altogether.
The result was that we had 4,502 newsletter subscribers and 316 ticked the box describing themselves as lesbian. That’s 7% of the total. A further 949 ticked the box lesbian/gay and 1,427 were unspecified or preferred not to say. Based on that data that means that between 316 (7%) and 2,376 (53%) of our subscribers were lesbian.
The 7% figure was used in court because it’s important that evidence is based on provable fact and it is a fact that, at a minimum, 7% of our subscribers were lesbians. However, common sense told us that that number was really much higher.
In August 2022 we commissioned a survey of our subscribers to help us plan to deliver services and support to LGB people. One of the questions we asked was about sexual orientation. That data showed that 34% are lesbian, 33% are gay men, 12% are bisexual, 20% are heterosexual and 1% preferred not to say. We are satisfied that this data is robust."
Plus, we have had at least one poster who declared that the 7% mentioned should be given high credibility due to being submitted as evidence and this statement no credence at all, because apparently that poster forgot that the numbers in this statement were also submitted to court as evidence at a later court hearing.
As can be seen here:
https://lgballiance.org.uk/tribunal-transcript/Â
The bit on membership is here:
"Yes, one of our biggest battles is to fight disinformation and on 11 August we sent out a survey, quite a complicated survey, to our 6,000 subscribers. Those are people who subscribe to LGB Alliance newsletters. There were many questions, and we’re still going through the responses, but one of the first questions was to ask people whether they were lesbian, gay, bisexual, straight, trans, etc. These are- We got a 20% response rate, which is unusually high. We were pleased about that, and it more or less shows an 80/20 split which is 80% gay, lesbian, bisexual, 20% straight, so it could be families of LGB people, it could be supporters. So 34% are lesbian, 33% are gay, the rest of bisexual and straight. Just to clarify and to add something else. The two founders are lesbians. The management team has always been made up of lesbian, gay and bisexual and the same with our trustees. So it’s very irritating to constantly be told that we have been led by homophobic, straight, white men, which is quite a common accusation."
Page 56/57 Wednesday 14th September 2022
NOTE AGAIN: the figure of 7% you keep quoting, represented the lesbians who declared their sexual orientation on the survey. It was NEVER just 7% LGB people as you keep trying to misrepresent further.
I know you like to post in ways that bring about negative reactions to your posts for whatever reaction it brings you, but seriously, your claims are not even close to being credible these days if this is your standard.