I am fascinated by this as I have one child with ASD and ADHD and one neurotypical. I also had a very late (40s) diagnosis of ADHD myself and would likely have got an autism diagnosis if I'd pursued that too. I had just about managed all my life but was a terrible daydreamer at school, always losing stuff, horrendous time management and procrastination. I developed coping strategies for most of those but they've remained a struggle and I've always been very socially awkward which made me almost suicidally unhappy when I was younger. It would never have occurred to my parents in the 1980s that I might be autistic, they just said I was "hopeless" and that they despaired of me (nice).
I was also dyspraxic - my mum did take me to the doctor for that and I was diagnosed with hypermobility which I've later found is often comorbid with ASD. I've always struggled with maths. I can do it but my brain processes it very slowly and the numbers on the page don't always "sound" the actual numbers in my head at first. For example 7, 8 and 9 have the same number value in my head for a split second. I don't know if that makes sense. But I think that probably means Discalcula (spelling?), another comorbidity.
My son was absolutely hyperactive and exhausted me and his teachers at primary age. I probed whether something was "wrong" with him and kept being told he just had a lot of energy, many boys were like this and he would calm down. By the time he was at secondary he was being referred to as "disruptive" . I pushed harder and lo and behold he (eventually) ended up with a diagnosis. In the 1980s he would just have been written off as "disruptive", end of story.
So a lot of the less severe ASD is now being diagnosed which would previously have gone under the radar. I've realised that my dad almost certainly has ASD. He is very odd socially and traumatised by the idea of any change in routine or environment. He's got through life because my mum has dedicated her life to enabling him basically. He retired in his 50s when his work systems became computerised and he couldn't handle it.
So a lot of it will be just better diagnosis, better recognition of different symptoms especially at the less severe end of the spectrum, less stigma about neurodiversity etc.
But I'm interested to hear that there are also many more diagnoses at the more severe end and curious about why that is. I had heard about paternal age being a factor - my husband was 44 when our eldest was born (though he was even older when we had our NT child).
We live in the Thames Valley where there it's a notably higher than UK average of ASD diagnoses. The theory is that there it's a huge IT industry in the Thames Valley which is an industry that attracts many on the spectrum (hope I'm not causing offence, I don't mean to) who then find their life partners in the industry and have children, who are more likely to have a genetic propensity for ASD from both sides.
There will likely be many other factors though which aren't yet known or understood. When my son was little doctors were still saying autism wasn't genetic but the reverse is true now.
Sorry for all the waffle, my hyperfocus got the better of me!