Hi OP. I think it's quite rational to not deliberately want to harm your friends/family and vice versa. A recent yougov poll found the same. What isn't rational to me is five years in, people saying it needs to be a cold as though that would make it true!
When covid first hit, lots of people were taking their kids out of school, many firms were suggesting wfh in advance of lockdown, as they were unsure of the impacts. As time has gone on, more and more research shows the harmful longer term impact covid infections have on health (including mental health). When we now have two million with long covid in England, a doubling of long covid in kids since last year, when long term sickness is off the charts, with around half a million studies showing the harms of covid, with decision-makers updating indoor air (including Parliament) for themselves, with people feeling 'ok' on their first infection but getting long covid from a later infection, when the financial press are flagging up the costs of long covid on the economy, it seems absolutely beyond bonkers to equate that with a cold! Who is more anxious - the person who chooses to ignore what covid is doing or the one who acknowledges it?
The phrase 'living with covid' implies that we weren't living with it when it first hit, including in lockdown. I think the way we are currently living with it is reckless - we could be addressing indoor air especially in places with high onward transmission like schools, better infection control in healthcare, supported isolation. Alternatively, we do as we currently are and spend public funds on some of the fallout of not doing those things, whilst destroying a much higher number of people's health, employment and education than was necessary...whilst also ensuring we still have shite pandemic preparedness should another pandemic hit.