Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked that 97% of 12 years olds have smart phones?

361 replies

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 18:15

My DCs school does not allow smartphones and most of the schools around here are the same. The kids all have Nokias (and often an AirTag or similar for tracking).

I can’t believe it’s 97%! Am I totally out of touch? She’s never even asked for a phone.

https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/23/children-who-dont-have-smartphones

Only 3% of UK 12-year-olds don’t have a smartphone. Here is how four of them feel about it | Smartphones | The Guardian

There has been a huge wave of parental concern about smartphones this year. So do kids without them feel deprived – or more alive?

https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/23/children-who-dont-have-smartphones

OP posts:
goodluckbinbin · 28/09/2024 14:36

‘Also a special function for YouTube videos because there’s so much junk on there but also so much valuable stuff. DD is working through a multi-video sketching tutorial atm but I don’t want them watching hours of unboxing videos or Mr Beast walking on hot coals to win a car or something.
’

we blocked YouTube on devices and our kids can access it only on rhe main family TV —— that’s also works…

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 14:36

sunsetsandboardwalks · 28/09/2024 13:43

Mobile phones aren't especially expensive.

Right, but poverty means not being able to afford lots of things that aren't at all expensive. And we're told that more than 3% of people live in poverty.

sunsetsandboardwalks · 28/09/2024 14:43

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 14:36

Right, but poverty means not being able to afford lots of things that aren't at all expensive. And we're told that more than 3% of people live in poverty.

But being in poverty now doesn't mean you were always in poverty.

Lots of children will own hand-me-down phones from other family members, plus a cheap simcard from somewhere like GiffGaff, or their parents will save all year and get a cheap second hand phone online for £50 etc.

Acommonreader · 28/09/2024 15:46

Year 7 dc here- all homework and communication from school is through an app. Kids are expected to message teachers eg about clubs, music lessons on the app too. Everyone has a smartphone in secondary school.

CruCru · 28/09/2024 16:01

A friend's daughter goes to a school where they have been asked to not have smartphones. I have no idea whether they have to sign a contract - I think everyone just complies. It's a bit irritating though because if the Tube is broken, it would be useful to have Citymapper available.

This is an interesting article: https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/children-under-16-smartphone-ban-mental-health-parenting-rb68pnxpb

I actually think the groups (WhatsApp, messenger etc) are not great for kids. Getting back to your phone and finding 300 messages (most of which are nonsense) would drive anyone crackers.

I won’t let my 12-year-old have a smartphone until she’s 16

Despite pressure from her daughter (and her friends), Fleur Britten is taking a tough line

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/children-under-16-smartphone-ban-mental-health-parenting-rb68pnxpb

StolenChanel · 28/09/2024 16:24

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 14:36

Right, but poverty means not being able to afford lots of things that aren't at all expensive. And we're told that more than 3% of people live in poverty.

Because we have people stuck in credit cycles. We’re a country based on consumerism.

Goldenbear · 28/09/2024 16:37

LaughingPig · 28/09/2024 08:26

@summerdawn

It is a cult of a very specific type of parent who want to take the lazy option of banning a tool that is an important and useful part of life for the vast majority. They are going to do enormous damage to their DC by denying them access to a communication device that virtually all of their peers will have on ideological grounds.

I agree there would be benefits in going back to 2004 and a world with no smartphones, but that is not going to happen. We therefore have to deal with the world as it is, by teaching and supporting DC to use smartphones safely.

Personally I think banning social media until 16 as this group want is a crazy idea. Giving that age group free access when they have been denied any previous experience would be a total disaster.

Of course family TVs are safer, but when my DC were teens (they are in their mid 20s now), most of their friends had TVs in bedrooms so the concern around content was the same as it is now for smartphones.

Yes, with TVs, I had a TV in my room, my friend's did and as young teenagers secretly have it on late at night watching The Word or other sich unsuitable programmes for a 13 year old. We were into grunge music which had a very depressing message about living, Just 17 offering advice on salad dieta for impressionable girls that wanted to look like Kate Moss.

Goldenbear · 28/09/2024 16:40

Actually, I was watching The Word more like 11 years old.

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 16:52

Acommonreader · 28/09/2024 15:46

Year 7 dc here- all homework and communication from school is through an app. Kids are expected to message teachers eg about clubs, music lessons on the app too. Everyone has a smartphone in secondary school.

So there's not a single parent in the whole school who's decided not to let their dc have one?

CowboyJoanna · 28/09/2024 16:55

Rhayader · 27/09/2024 18:15

My DCs school does not allow smartphones and most of the schools around here are the same. The kids all have Nokias (and often an AirTag or similar for tracking).

I can’t believe it’s 97%! Am I totally out of touch? She’s never even asked for a phone.

https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/23/children-who-dont-have-smartphones

Nokias??? Are you sure you dont mean iPhones??

At my DDs school im sure any kid with a Nokia would be the laughing stock of the school

Tiredalwaystired · 28/09/2024 17:09

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 13:38

I'm pretty confused by it, when we're always hearing about how many people are struggling financially. I just wonder how this tracks with 97% of parents seemingly being able to afford to get phones for children?

Hand me downs and a £10 a month contract.

Acommonreader · 28/09/2024 18:21

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 16:52

So there's not a single parent in the whole school who's decided not to let their dc have one?

Maybe , but their children would find school life very difficult as a result. I’ve just told mine to check their app for homework due on Monday and their upcoming sports fixtures. One was pleased to find a merit message from a teacher.
I think these things can be managed- most dc I know in year7/8 are not allowed instagram snapchat or tick tok. Also no phones before school or at bedtime. It’s not all or nothing!

Elsvieta · 28/09/2024 18:30

Acommonreader · 28/09/2024 18:21

Maybe , but their children would find school life very difficult as a result. I’ve just told mine to check their app for homework due on Monday and their upcoming sports fixtures. One was pleased to find a merit message from a teacher.
I think these things can be managed- most dc I know in year7/8 are not allowed instagram snapchat or tick tok. Also no phones before school or at bedtime. It’s not all or nothing!

Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't - my point is, it's the parents' choice. If they decide on nothing, it's nothing. And if they can't pay for phones for kids, it's nothing. And why should kids suffer because of that?

lololulu · 28/09/2024 22:21

Errors · 28/09/2024 12:18

Ok, I concede that I have no experience of parenting a teenager nor any idea of the differences in maturity between 10 and 16. I’ve been glad to read the measured posts about it because it has calmed me down somewhat.

Well wait until you have a teenager!!!!

Rhayader · 29/09/2024 08:39

CowboyJoanna · 28/09/2024 16:55

Nokias??? Are you sure you dont mean iPhones??

At my DDs school im sure any kid with a Nokia would be the laughing stock of the school

There’s three allowed phones and they are all dumb phones with no camera. Most kids get the Nokia because it’s the easiest one to source….

I think it was something like £14.

Even these phones have to be switched off at school and you cannot use them until you are a reasonable distance from the school gates.

OP posts:
Longma · 29/09/2024 10:45

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Smallsalt · 29/09/2024 10:47

My twins got phones in July on turning 16. Never even asked previously.

Longma · 29/09/2024 10:54

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Longma · 29/09/2024 10:57

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Longma · 29/09/2024 10:59

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Longma · 29/09/2024 11:00

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 29/09/2024 11:18

I'm surprised that you're surprised, OP. It is completely the norm for 12yos to have smartphones these days.

I'm guessing that a lot of parents who choose the type of school that you describe tend to be quite conservative anyway, so perhaps more likely to go along with the school's strict phone policy. But yes, it's definitely a fairly unusual bubble that your kids are in.

Personally, I sit on the side of thinking that it's better to teach kids to interact with technology in a safe and sensible way, rather than banning it, but if it's the norm for that school, then at least the kids won't feel like they're missing out in any way.

I think it's much, much harder for the tiny minority of kids in mainstream schools who may find that they're the only one without a phone and therefore end up being excluded from group chats and social arrangements etc. I understand parents' concerns about smartphones etc but will never understand why parents would choose to put their kids in that position.

SallyWD · 29/09/2024 11:19

I believe. I know loads of kids that age. All have smart phones.

Anicecumberlandsausage · 29/09/2024 11:32

When my DD, DNeice & DNephew we're all in Year 7 they were given second hand smartphone handsets that once belonged to me or my brother. Smartphone use is very common where we are, even though we live in London with its tiny catchments. I knew of kids having dumb phones in Year 6, but most graduated up in Year 7 to a new or used smartphone.

StMarieforme · 29/09/2024 11:35

My daughter had a smartphone at 13. 14 years ago! But I parented her properly, she was/ is not screen addicted and it never caused any issues. She was however, able to message me with ease, and also it gave us both peace of mind.

Swipe left for the next trending thread