Making a murderer, Steven Avery had me gripped. I thought the treatment of his nephew Brendan, who with a low IQ how the police interrogation process was carried out was disgusting. It had a flawed investigation
The thing that didn’t turn me with this one was that, while I completely understand why Brendan would have made something up to satisfy detectives and just end it and get out of the room, he then later on his first phone call, gave the same story to his mum. I would have thought, if he didn’t do what he said, his first words to his mum would have been ‘help me, I didn’t do anything, I said I did stuff so they’d let me go, now I’m in jail’. But instead, he gave a recap of what he’d done in different words, said sorry to her, please forgive me etc. I agree he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed, so wouldn’t have even known that call would be recorded (even if told, not sure it would have computed), so there was zero reason he’d lie to his mum on his first contact with her rather than saying ‘I didn’t do anything’. THEN, after he has legal visits, people talk to him, there is a different story.
Do I believe the story he told detectives, no, I think it was under duress.
Do I believe the story he told his mum, absolutely.
Do I believe his story after people had then talked to him, no, I think that was damage control.
Therefore, I’m not unhappy about where he is. But the good thing about justice processes is we all have different thoughts and different takes on things, and the right to question which is a good thing.