Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Do some mums just not like working?

1000 replies

Dragontooth · 10/09/2024 21:03

I know this sounds awful, and judgey but I'm trying to understand. I am not a benefit basher and I used to be on benefits, also a single parent.
I'm on a lot of 'being skint' forums, I was on UC but now I have quite a lot of experience in various things so I like to try to help.
There are a number of mums who were previously on legacy benefits who are terrified by UC and the work search appointments. Lots who are unemployed and some who do very part time jobs, 10 hours or less.
I don't understand why they are so resistant to finding work or better paid work. Having been on benefits, it is a horrible existence. I was paid £850 per month. Clearly it would only take a MW part time job to make me so much better off. And they pay for childcare/ holiday club.
It literally changes your life. You can pay for things to have a better, easier life like driving lessons. Not only that but you are back in the work place so it's not such a shock when your children leave home.
I feel these women are so anxious, they can't see how their lives could look with more money/ options. Not only that but a lot of them have their heads in the sand about retirement, will we even get a state pension? Then there's the fact that it's so much harder getting back into employment after five or ten years out, I think that's what UC wants to avoid. I'm not saying it's a kind or person centred system but in reality is taking years out of the workplace really in these women's best interests either?
Disability/ disabled children obviously excluded.

OP posts:
Ponoka7 · 11/09/2024 01:12

hollylou · 11/09/2024 00:47

I'm pretty sure if every parent of child aged under 16 didn't work and became a stay at home our economy would be in a whole world of trouble.. We all "bring up our children" I work full time but still bring my son up whilst also teaching him the importantace and benefits of working to support our family.

I'm not so sure. Me and my friendship group have all hit over 55. I want to do courses to show that I can do the IT required when I want to go back to work (not that anyone will give me a job at 60). My friends are applying for jobs and getting nowhere. Get rid of ageism and you'd have your workforce.

I can remember in the 90's when the Torys and press were attacking single mums (not my situation). I'd see the Mums doing their best for their children, looking after elderly neighbours, volunteering during school hours. Then I'd see the single men, sitting outside the pub all day and in the betting shops, the younger men would be into petty crime. When I did care plans for people at home, they were always propped up by the unemployed women around the service user. I've started reading in my GCs school, again it's out of work women. We do a lot of unpaid labour that has a massive contribution to society.

blueshoes · 11/09/2024 01:12

Fluffyowl00 · 10/09/2024 23:08

Glib.

Let me guess. You get your friends to call you ‘compassionate blueshoes’ because you have a £10 a month DD to the RSPCA

I would Never donate to the RSPCA.

NonsuchCastle · 11/09/2024 01:13

Floralspecscase · 10/09/2024 21:24

A particular type of economy might rely on that, but if that's so, it's probably not the most sensible sort of economy to have, is it?

Actually childrearing is very essential work indeed, a lot more important than serving coffee, which is a luxury.

Until recently, single parents had benefits until their children were 16 and before that many mothers didn't do paid work and the economy wasn't in a particularly worse state.

Wait a minute, "A particular type of economy might rely on..." people working?
Name me an economy which doesn't rely on people working.

No33 · 11/09/2024 01:14

WhiteLily1 · 11/09/2024 00:52

Don’t claim any benefits. Made sure I wanted to have kids with a very stable partner and enough money / house first before having any kids. No family handouts either.

Ah, so you have massive privilege.

Well done I guess.

ZanyPombear · 11/09/2024 01:16

@Fleeceyhat are you not worried about having your children removed by social services?

theprincessthepea · 11/09/2024 01:16

I am so glad I worked when my DD was young. I now have a business and have super flexible working which is great. I spend so much time with DD now that she is a teen but I’m able to freelance or pick up a decent paid job due to my experience if I wanted to. However I must say that the short time I’ve spent on Mat leave recently mixed in with the flexibility I have, I am almost dreading returning to working “full time” and balancing it all again.

I can imagine that must be a factor. I personally enjoy work but I am also lucky to Be in a position whereby I love what I do , it’s all done from home and I have an amazing support system. If one or 2 of those factors didn’t exist I can see why working is a turn off.

I was on UC when I was made redundant and I wish the government hired better work coaches that could match people to their skills. For my business I took on young people on UC via the job centre and they were so passionate and loved it!! Some said that they were so pleased with the placement. More job centres and work coaches need to do a better job preparing people and maybe some investment needs t go into apprentice like work schemes.

XenoBitch · 11/09/2024 01:17

ZanyPombear · 11/09/2024 01:16

@Fleeceyhat are you not worried about having your children removed by social services?

FFS, why do you think that?
You can be disabled and take good care of your kids!

NonsuchCastle · 11/09/2024 01:19

WalkingonWheels · 10/09/2024 21:32

I think everyone should be working, unless they are too disabled, or can be self-sufficient without relying on government support.

I'm disabled and mostly completely housebound. Mostly bedbound, actually. I work full time. I have to. We can't survive on benefits. If I can work, most people can work. They just don't want to, and our benefits system makes it easy not to have to work.

Most people DO work.
To say "If I can work, most people can work" whilst a nonsense because "most people" already work, is further nonsense because you have no idea what other people's health conditions are.
It is NOT easy not to work. The benefits system is a mess, poorly managed, and not designed to help.
Don't believe what you see on your Channel 5 documentaries.

WalkingonWheels · 11/09/2024 01:27

NonsuchCastle · 11/09/2024 01:19

Most people DO work.
To say "If I can work, most people can work" whilst a nonsense because "most people" already work, is further nonsense because you have no idea what other people's health conditions are.
It is NOT easy not to work. The benefits system is a mess, poorly managed, and not designed to help.
Don't believe what you see on your Channel 5 documentaries.

No, they dont.

As someone who has vast experience with the benefits system, yes, it is a mess, but it easy to use it and not have to work. I'm guessing you don't know anyone who knows exactly what to say and do to proudly, "Play the system".

I've never watched Channel 5 in my life. HTH.

GreenTeaLikesMe · 11/09/2024 01:36

For me this was a big reason why I always stayed in the workforce, even though childcare costs meant I was only breaking even a lot of the time when kids were young. Taking long breaks is hard as you lose skills, contacts and confidence. The thought of going back can become overwhelming.

ItsTheGAGGGGGGGG · 11/09/2024 01:37

I don't understand why someone would want to work if they don't have to

Exactly. People act as if they get up in the morning and go to work just for the sake of it. Just because they like being there and wouldn’t rather be doing something else.

I work 16 hours a week and I don’t actually need too as I’m a registered carer for my disabled children. It’s only about £800 extra a month and I do it so I have a break away from them twice a week. Saying that, I’ll never work one hour more than 16 hours because I simply don’t want too. I‘ll probably go down to 8/10 hours a week in a few years just because I can.

I personally think a mix between receiving UC and paid employment is great. Free dental work, free prescriptions, discount of glasses, up to 85% of childcare costs paid and 30 hours funding under the working parent scheme. And before anyone tells me, ‘I don’t want to pay for your lifestyle,’ you don’t, trust me. Google the percentage of benefits that were spent on UC for the tax year of 23/24. You’ll be shocked

ItsTheGAGGGGGGGG · 11/09/2024 01:39

No33 · 11/09/2024 01:14

Ah, so you have massive privilege.

Well done I guess.

It’s not a massive privilege. It’s literally common sense?🤣

GreenTeaLikesMe · 11/09/2024 01:40

Dorisbonson · 10/09/2024 23:29

Running an Airbnb is a business with profit and loss risk. It involves cleaning, marketing, legal compliance, paperwork and paying tax. It puts capital at risk and involves active owner participation in management to varying degrees.

Running one is clearly legally and by an reasonable definition a small business.

Residential short term "sub let's" as you call them would not tend to be legal anyway. Most owners don't approve of sub letting by tenants and contracts generally prevent this.

I suggest you have a problem with corner shops because it is a logical extension of your view on the use of residential property for business purposes as immoral. Though that was based on my assumption that you actually knew what a business was, as you don't understand what a business is (or you chose to disagree with legal, tax, linguistic and accounting definitions of a business) then obviously I can't apply logic to your views.

The difference is that the market for corner shops is only so big, meaning that it's just the odd property that gets converted in this way - also corner shops are a benefit to current residents.

AirBnB hollows out entire neighborhoods and is pretty detrimental to communities in a whole lot of ways.

The UK should restrict AirBnB a LOT more, while making it easier to build hotels. Hotels can be stacked up high, unlike houses. They are also self-contained and can be kept at a slight distance from residential properties and built for tourist purposes, such as extensive soundproofing (meaning residents are less likely to be annoyed by noise), and can be deliberately located near public transport so that extra traffic and parking issues are not generated.

Nastyaa · 11/09/2024 01:57

Floralspecscase · 10/09/2024 21:20

A lot of mothers, especially single mothers, are so exhausted and stressed they're barely able to get through each day. Motherhood can be physically and mentally and emotionally shattering. To fit in hours of work each day on top of travel, housework, shopping, the mental and emotional load of parenting, etc. etc. leaves no time for things essential for mental health.

Of course, for some it's not so hard, because some have very different lives/bodies/experiences/situations/etc., so people like that perhaps don't understand that not everybody has their energy levels, their amount of sleep, their physical fitness, their mental health, their situation, etc., but for a very great many this is the case and they're already at the limit of what they can cope with.

On top of this, remember the Universal Credit system isn't supportive: it's intended to frighten people. It's based on threats, sanctions, and constant stressful meetings usually arranged at difficult or impossible times.

Add to that that childcare is difficult to find, work fitting school hours incredibly difficult to find (regulations ensuring employers had to fit school hours better would help), and many children are very distressed by long hours in school or childcare...plus the fact that many people are distressed not being able to spend time with their children (as working full time you only really see them for homework and bed, then have to spend the weekend trying to rest plus do all the chores that were meant to be done during the week)...

There are some reasons.

Also, many if not most jobs are very stressful indeed, so, added to the stress of parenting, can tip people over the edge.

Again, some people find jobs they enjoy or can at least bear with reasonable employers and have suitable childcare, but there are plenty who can't.

The anxiety and fear of being told you'll lose everything (money to survive, home, possibly your children if you're made homeless) due to not being able to meet Universal Credit criteria adds enormously to all of this.

This, this and THIS.

I couldn't have put it better myself. I've always said if I could just parent without the additional slog of the weekly tasks plus working, I would be a much better & present mother.

Instead I run around each day like a headless chicken, so overwhelmed with everything constantly. I work in finance & it can be really stressful, then get home to more stress.

In an ideal world I would have a partner who earned a decent wage & I could stay at home and raise our children. I can't give my job or my child 100% of me, I somedays I feel shit at my job & a good mum & others I feel like an awful mother but brilliant at my job.

Universal credit don't make going back to work for single mothers very appealing, they scare monger us into taking jobs that are unrealistic and simply don't work. In some situations the mother is actually better off not working until a child is of a certain age.

Women have the weight of the world on their shoulders, whatever we do will never be good enough.

As the saying goes 'women are expected to raise children like they don't work, & work like they don't raise children'.

NonsuchCastle · 11/09/2024 02:05

SugarHorseSpooks · 10/09/2024 22:15

While it's true that global capitalism has played a significant role in advancing technology and facilitating complex supply chains, this does not necessarily mean that capitalism, especially in its current globalized form, is the only or best framework for innovation, technological development, or scientific collaboration. A closer look at history, alternative economic systems, and the nature of innovation challenges the notion that without capitalism, society would lack modern conveniences like mobile phones, vaccines, or advanced technology.

Not to mention the average joe public didnt make these possible, so its not like anyone can be the scientist etc and even then once the position is filled due to capitalism then that person is not needed etc

Name a non-capitalist economic system which has produced more innovation, technological development or scientific collaboration.
Then explain why this non-capitalist economic system is better for the majority to live within.
I am not in favor of laissez faire capitalism either.

Areolaborealis · 11/09/2024 02:07

Summary of main points so far:

Ignore the dads who don't stick around to raise to raise their kids and refuse to contribute financially because mum should suck it up and do the work of three people while suffering from health issues. To facilitate this, kids should be shoved into care between 7.30 and 6pm regardless of whether they can cope with it.

ncforcatquestion · 11/09/2024 02:09

I think it's just wrong for kids to be in child care all the time

OonaStubbs · 11/09/2024 02:18

People should work. Not working is unhealthy.
No woman is forced to have children. It's a personal choice.
Having children should not be viewed as an alternative to work, or a source of income.

ZanyPombear · 11/09/2024 02:21

XenoBitch · 11/09/2024 01:17

FFS, why do you think that?
You can be disabled and take good care of your kids!

She has profound needs

XenoBitch · 11/09/2024 02:25

ZanyPombear · 11/09/2024 02:21

She has profound needs

Are you her social worker? Thought not.

mathanxiety · 11/09/2024 02:30

WalkingonWheels · 11/09/2024 00:51

So did you ensure that you were financially secure before having children? Or did you have them knowing that the government would have to fund that lifestyle choice?

If you yourself had babies in an NHS hospital and sent your offspring to a state school, then you have probably taken far more out of the kitty than you put in. If any of your babies ended up in a NICU, then you're looking at far more funding of "choices".

The government funds or funded in the past the facilities that make possible all of your "lifestyle choices" including the choice to drive on public roads or commute using a bus or train service, or use broadband or electricity or gas. It funds your security when you travel through airports or ports, and it guarantees your money in the bank.

It defends the land, the seas, and the airspace of the UK from threats even if you decide to buy ten years' worth of tinned sardines, cream of mushroom soup, and bog roll, fashion a tin foil hat for yourself, and go and live in a bunker.

And you can't demand a refund because you don't personally use any of the services the government pays for.

If you want to take up arms against the current welfare system, make sure the policies you favour don't hurt women. They are too easy and - to judge from this thread - too popular a target. The best move any government could make to reduce the welfare bill, the waste of money in education, and ultimately the prison bill would be to force deadbeat dads to financially support their children.

WalkingonWheels · 11/09/2024 02:58

@mathanxiety Nope. Privately educated family for five generations, private healthcare and no NICU. I don't drive myself any more, don't use public transport, don't use gas and I don't travel on planes or boats. So no, I doubt very much that I've taken out more than I've put in.

I didn't at any point refer to women, by the way. I think ALL people should work if they can, unless they have the funds to support themselves. I also agree with your comment about fathers who don't pay child maintenance, or try any way possible to get out of paying the correct amount. It's appalling.

babyproblems · 11/09/2024 03:06

Erm I think you’re being really naïveand sound like your own life experiences are quite small...
Many mums (and people) don’t work and aren’t on benefits. There are many people whose family set up is not like yours and very different to yours.
I think for those women in the demographic you are talking about who are not working and do not want to work, there are thousands of reasons. Ranging from confidence to DV to health problems. You literally seem to think that life is either black or white and frankly it’s not. There are millions of people all living different lives. Try and be more open minded and live & let live. Everyone only has their life to live!!! I suspect you’d be even better off if you focussed on running your own race than thinking about what others are doing. Maybe then you could leave all the money saving forums etc!

RosannaSpider · 11/09/2024 03:14

Some people will rather rely on the government to pay for them, this is usually learned behaviour along with being lazy. At least a mum has a semi excuse to not work although I wouldn't personally

TealSheep · 11/09/2024 03:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.