Well, I think you're wrong about just about all of this. As many people have pointed out on this thread, you don't really seem to have a very high, erh, cognitive grasp of the issues around the cost of living crisis and what is entailed by people buying expensive tickets to pop concerts, and it's probably not much use trying to explain. But still ...
The idea of 'scroungers' you adumbrate falls once you look at the actual rates of benefit in this country (compared with relative historical levels, or indeed with elsewhere in Europe, say). Poor propaganda. You fell for it.
Do any of these people who, you say, are 'scrounging' receive much in the way of capital gains? Or, perhaps, is the epithet scrounger more appropriately applied to one who, while making nothing personally, nevertheless gets rich just by buying (low) and selling (high) things other people have produced?
Who pays a higher tax rate currently? Someone who makes things or helps people (through illness, say) and is paid for what they do, or someone who does nothing useful but simply buys cheap and sells dear? Do you know? Would you agree the latter is useless to society by comparison with the former? Might we start redistributing by taxing the latter at least as much as the former? Do you have a justification for CGT being lower rated than Income Tax, in the light of this?
You fell for the propaganda about IHT as well, I see. Maybe another time ...