I can't help thinking - activists/newspapers/politicians are loud when campaigning about the gender pay gap or the state of child care or a woman's rights to her own body but somehow on this topic no one wants to criticise too often or too loudly.
ARE activists, newspapers, and politicians "loud" about these issues? I would say nowhere near loud enough, and certainly not loud enough to make any kind of sustained improvement to any of these issues. In fact, globally, we are going back on all of these.
Unfortunately, PPs are correct - when something only or mainly negatively impacts women, society just does not care. "The West", led by the USA, got "our people" out and left everyone else to their fates.
If the taliban cannot feed their people there will be a refugee crisis similar to the Syrian one with millions in the move. When Kabul fell, there was very little refuge for fleeing Afghans. Some people had connections to the countries which had had a presence there and were able to leverage that to get out, and some could leverage other personal connections, but very far from all. Iran eventually did relax its requirements in response to the crisis, but I think it was the only neighbouring country to do so. There was a very strong sense of Afghanistan closing, of a very short window to find a way to go and then - trapped. How can there be a refugee crisis if no one can leave?