Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To boycott the Olympics for allowing a rapist to compete

293 replies

Fluffyelephant · 28/07/2024 11:21

I cannot believe in this day and age a convicted child rapist has been allowed to compete in the Olympics.

I know he was booed when he was competing but that's not enough. He never should have been allowed to compete in the first place and as a result I'm not watching any of the Olympics and encouraging others to do the same. I know that means other legitimate athletes will sadly be punished for the actions of one man and the decision makers for the Olympics - but what else can you do to send a message it's unacceptable?

For context, the volleyball player raped a 12 year old girl in Britain who he met online when he was 19 and was convicted in 2016. To add further insult to injury he only served 1 year of the sentence and seems to have gone on to marry a police officer!? He also has since said he's not a pedophile (although admits he did do what he was accused of) and that the media saying he is one is 'a load of nonsense'.

Unbelievable that this isn't considered more serious in a country like the Netherlands or by the Olympics itself.

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/articles/cpd9e0r2dxmo

OP posts:
crumblingschools · 28/07/2024 18:41

You would think if he has to be barred from Olympic Village for safeguarding reasons that would be sufficient for him to not be allowed to compete.

Foxxo · 28/07/2024 18:51

LouSassole · 28/07/2024 15:58

Scary that there are nonce sympathisers on here!! The PP who said that the olympic committee value a horse over a child is correct. Its shameful.

The IOC do not value a horse over a child because the IOC have at no point been involved in the withdrawal/suspension of Charlotte Dujardin. That was done by UKs Equestrian Regulatory Body.

deeahgwitch · 28/07/2024 19:15

ToniGreen · 28/07/2024 18:31

It's not for any individual or organisation to then apply some sort of perpetual moral punishment.

Murderers, rapists and child rapists are the exception. The UK wouldnt put forward a nonce to the Olympics.

👏🏻

ebadame · 28/07/2024 19:26

EatTheGnome · 28/07/2024 17:55

Unfortunately I think unless all opposing teams just sit down and let his team win by default, with no sportsmanship, nothing will happen.

It sends the message to the team and country that noone will compete with them. They can get as many Golds as they want, but everyone knows first place goes to Silver because noone really played them.

I don't think they are allowed to do that. Plus they trained for 4 years to win "fairly" against them.

Ilovetowander · 28/07/2024 19:47

Having the view that the individual can compete in the Olympics does not make the person an apologist for them, we are all entitled to views without hurling insults.

LittleLeggs · 28/07/2024 20:11

I find it odd that people seem to think that just by being in the Olympics he is being 'lauded on the world stage' or similar as if he's got some amazing honour/everyone loves him automatically. By competing in the Olympics he has become more worldwide famous and known for being a child rapist than he ever will be for his sporting exploits.
I actually have more of a problem with men like him fading back into normal life as if nothing ever happened and even if people occasionally find out he's on the register, the man can act like the details are unfortunate/"not how it sounds". Not this time. He is now a famous child rapist, with the details known, and is being rightly vilified for it, on the world stage.

People respect Olympic athletes generally because of their character, discipline and hard work. So people also will not respect someone of disgusting character whether he's good at volleyball or not

ToniGreen · 28/07/2024 20:12

@LittleLeggs so in that case you think he's buzzing off the notoriety?

Yesitisnotthatitbe · 28/07/2024 20:18

ReacherSaidNothing · 28/07/2024 12:04

I'd be interested to hear from the 5% who have voted YABU as to their reasoning...

Because he's already served prison time

LittleLeggs · 28/07/2024 20:19

ToniGreen · 28/07/2024 20:12

@LittleLeggs so in that case you think he's buzzing off the notoriety?

Heh? How did you get that from what I said?

I don't really care, I can't control his emotions or screwed up way of thinking in the same way I can't control that there will be the odd few people that are apologists for him (his wife and friends etc)... But the vast majority of people vilify him for it and I find some comfort in that, that evil people are called out in the media and public consciousness and there will be fewer people out there thinking he's a "good man" (of course there will always be a few sickos on his side and we can't change that).

SpudleyLass · 28/07/2024 20:42

Yesitisnotthatitbe · 28/07/2024 20:18

Because he's already served prison time

Ah yes, 12 months is a perfect sentence for what he has done.

The child rapist has also effectively taken a spot that could have gone to another Dutch athlete, one presumably who hasn't abused children.

Agapornis · 28/07/2024 21:14

Plenty of Dutch people disagree with this decision. This is what you get when you systematically exclude women from sport. At the previous Olympics only 13% of coaches were women, and until 2013 less than 20% of the IOC members were women - it's only been about 40% since November last year.

I am deeply disappointed with the actions of the Dutch Volleyball Association and the Dutch Olympic Committee. It's quite a lot like what happened with the Dutch Eurovision candidate - somehow their national media seems to believe what they're told by PR people. It's what can happen in small countries where everyone knows each other and they don't want to rock the boat or lose an interview.

The guy's Dutch language Wikipedia page got locked by an admin (male sounding name) who insisted it wasn't rape because it had a different name in Dutch law at the time - fortunately plenty of Dutch speakers disagreed and it got amended (somewhat).

TooBigForMyBoots · 28/07/2024 21:32

Kriscross · 28/07/2024 17:41

I particularly hate child abusers for a particular reason. None of them are lovely men.

Yes he shouldn't be harmed but he shouldn't be clapped and cheer either. For the supporters of him, imagine if he did it to your 12 year old. Get on with his life quietly.

Absolutely. I am glad to see the majority of Mnetters on this thread are revolted by this.

And in a way I'm ok that it has exposed the sympathy, minimisation and apologism granted to child rapists.

Thank you @Fluffyelephant.Thanks

Disturbia81 · 28/07/2024 23:00

Someone who makes the decision to rape a 12 year old.. it just doesn't matter that he served his sentence. He should be forever limited from certain things in life.
I'm so disgusted by this. And continually disgusted by rape and paedo apologists

Ilovetowander · 28/07/2024 23:19

I don't think anyone is denying that rape is an appalling crime.

ToniGreen · 28/07/2024 23:23

Ilovetowander · 28/07/2024 23:19

I don't think anyone is denying that rape is an appalling crime.

Rape is bad enough but this is with a child fgs. The man should have disappeared into the ether not brought the Olympics into disrepute.

TrishM80 · 28/07/2024 23:35

ReacherSaidNothing · 28/07/2024 12:04

I'd be interested to hear from the 5% who have voted YABU as to their reasoning...

Because the question was should people refuse to watch the Olympics because of this guy competing.

I'm not going to stop watching the Olympics because of him, and I doubt the YANBU voters will either, despite what they voted!

Kriscross · 29/07/2024 07:56

TooBigForMyBoots · 28/07/2024 21:32

Absolutely. I am glad to see the majority of Mnetters on this thread are revolted by this.

And in a way I'm ok that it has exposed the sympathy, minimisation and apologism granted to child rapists.

Thank you @Fluffyelephant.Thanks

This. A 12 year old cannot consent. They can be groomed and raped. The lifetime trauma of what he did to her will never go. He gets supporters, minimisation and claps. Strange standards some have.

Disturbia81 · 29/07/2024 09:00

@ToniGreen Exactly.. disappeared into the ether. Not given these opportunities and lauded about on tv.. what message is that giving? That we should forgive child rapists and their lives won't be too affected after the crime. They should be living an isolated life shunned by society and on all kinds of registers

capstix · 29/07/2024 09:25

Nanny0gg · 28/07/2024 16:37

He didn't serve four years though, did he?

And the Americans losing their collective mind has nothing to do with it

He served his sentence. If he was released early that was the state's decision that he'd paid his debt. Trump is relevant because it illustrates how 150m people can suddenly not care about rape, when it suits them. This is just a social media pile on.

Disturbia81 · 29/07/2024 09:43

@capstix Paid his debt 😂 he will NEVER finish paying the debt. She will pay it for her whole life.

RenegadeMasterx · 29/07/2024 09:56

That's absolutely revolting. I don't watch the olympics anyway but that's disgusting. What the hell js going on?

Agapornis · 29/07/2024 10:06

Someone had a bit of fun with Wikipedia Grin

To boycott the Olympics for allowing a rapist to compete
Ilovetowander · 29/07/2024 10:15

The point is that he is free and not locked up, if he were in a role that required DBS n this country then he would not be able to get a job. However, he could get other jobs in this country as that is the law , also it is good that offenders can gain employment and be active in work. The Olympics does not have restrictions, individual countries may have , I don't know,

Aroastdinnerisnotahumanright · 29/07/2024 10:18

Agapornis · 29/07/2024 10:06

Someone had a bit of fun with Wikipedia Grin

😂😂
The irony is that if he had stayed out of the Olympics far fewer people would know about his crimes.

brunettemic · 29/07/2024 10:21

You’d be better off boycotting the Netherlands seeing as it’s their decision to allow him to compete, not the Olympics.

Swipe left for the next trending thread