What I still find fascinating is how many people on this thread want to introduce completely unsubstantiated stuff , to try and indict the officer(s) who were fighting to gain control over highly violent suspects who had attacked them and heavily injured a fellow officer.
here’s some examples of the unsubstantiated stuff:
“ I can understand why they retaliated”
”loss of control”
”police cannot be judge and jury”
“the suspect said something before he kicked their face”
etc..
All these comments do is introduce confusion and doubt, adding completely unsubstantiated character accusations to portray the policeman as an out of control, vindictive person who reacted to something completely unheard or unseen on the tape, but the Mumsnetter wants to join the dots and create a “motive”.
It is like the Jay Slater case ended, and so all the “I know more than you” types have piled in here instead.
Please stop. NOT EVERYTHING IS A GAME OR A CONSPIRACY.
As l have said since page 1 of this thread and since before the new footage came out, these police were overwhelmed in number and trying to restrain a set of highly violent and continually aggressive suspects who had assaulted officers from behind and broken the nose of a female officer.
The Taser is not a “stun gun” where the person miraculously falls asleep the minute they come into contact with it. This is not Star Trek.
i wish we could just wait until the inquiry - clearly someone sympathetic to the police has release this new video for the very reason that the officer was being tried in the court of public opinion on the basis of an abridged clip with NO context.