Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

No more Protest

363 replies

lightinthebox · 19/07/2024 21:44

Regardless of your views of Just Stop Oil, we should all be worried.

This has gone through easily because people hate Just Stop Oil, it’s an easy target and has fooled people.

We should not be celebrating lengthy jail sentences for planning protests, we should be scared about what this means.

Not just that, but if peaceful protests equal a jail sentence then what’s to stop people from going to violence if they know they can’t protest.

People should stop and think, ignore your prejudice and see the bigger picture.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Whatjemimadid · 20/07/2024 01:44

Yanbu. Without protest, we wouldn't have votes for women and the working class. Or weekends off. Or holiday and sick pay. Whatever your views on Just Stop Oil, you need to understand that British law is built on precedents. And now the precedent has been set to stop protest for any reason. No matter what s future government proposed,

HeddaGarbled · 20/07/2024 01:46

I think that the sentences are too long whilst also thinking there should be limits on the disruption that protesters are permitted to cause without personal consequences.

It’s not “no more protests”; it’s “don’t try and close the M25”. But 12 months would be deterrent without being vindictive.

Whatjemimadid · 20/07/2024 01:50

IllMetByMoonlight · 20/07/2024 01:05

Be the change you want to see, Literally. How about looking up The Climate Majority Project, who exist very much for people who are concerned about the impact of the climate emergency and want to get behind change but not necessarily in the tradition of the kind of civil disobedience and peaceful protest advocated by Gandhi, Mandela and XR. It might be a good starting point for connecting with something more appealing, perhaps locally? Horses for courses. Or in this case, causes.

To respond to the OP, I too am very concerned about what this kind of sentencing means for democracy. I have listened to RH speak at public meetings on several occasions, participated in zooms (evidence submitted included recordings of a zoom attended by a Sun journalist) and subsequent actions, although not anywhere near the scale of the protest in question; when the reality of what climate science clearly points to becomes apparent, it is a natural consequence to want to take action to protect what we love: ours and other mothers' children, wildlife and the natural world; species and habitats; livelihoods, food and energy security; entire weather systems, often at considerable personal cost, risk of harm and reputational damage. Many of us have decades behind us of active memberships in organisations such as Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, RSPB, WWF, the Woodland Trust among others, as well as writing to MPs and corporations with our concerns, only to feel frustrated with the pace of change and impact. And looking historically, when people find the courage to engage in civil disobedience, the change so desperately needed is more likely to happen. The climate science is compelling and clear, the men and women who act, informed by this, are motivated by care and overwhelming concern. Sure, actions may cause disruption, but not moving to impact change is going to be more damaging over time.

Yes to all your points but especially that inaction causes more disruption.

Extreme unseasonable floods cause road, rail, business and housing disruption.

The insanely hot summer of 22 melted roads and warped train tracks. Much disruption

Looking at hotter countries this happens tenfold and is an indication of what happens next here.

KillerTomato7 · 20/07/2024 02:24

EmpressOfTheThread · 20/07/2024 00:08

I wonder if it would be more effective to target large, wealthy corporate offenders, rather than ordinary people trying to go to work or hospital appointments?

If this were inconveniencing elites rather than ordinary people, they would have found a way to put them in prison for ten years rather than five.

XChrome · 20/07/2024 04:52

OP, I mistakenly voted YABU. I agree with you. Punishing non-violent protesters criminally is what fascists do. It's fundamentally anti-democratic. If they are violent or threaten violence, that's another thing altogether.

XChrome · 20/07/2024 04:56

OhHelloMiss · 19/07/2024 21:48

It's being considered to fall under 'terrorism'

Prison is appropriate place for them too.

Non-violent protesting is not terrorism. That's ridiculous. The right to protest is a fundamental human right, as long as there is no violence or threats of violence. If they are attacking or harassing people then it's legitimate to lock them up.

XChrome · 20/07/2024 04:57

PoloMum · 19/07/2024 23:19

Blocking ambulances is not a peaceful form of protest.

That part I agree with you on. Not acceptable.

combinationpadlock · 20/07/2024 05:01

MeouwCat · 19/07/2024 21:51

I agree with you. 5 years is utterly ridiculous. I don't totally support what they did.

The justification for the sentence seems to be the potential deaths that could have occurred because of their actions. But what about the doctors' strike? The deaths that could have and may have occurred because of the doctor's strike.

There are also deaths caused by leaving roads open!

TreeShrugger · 20/07/2024 05:01

They aren’t peaceful.

Their actions don’t help the cause of climate activism. They actively hinder it.

The options aren’t just do
nothing or that kind of activism.

Valeriesimpleton · 20/07/2024 05:02

It is violent and threatening. People take their families to exhibitions to see the world's wonders, they don't expect to expose them to the threat and violence these idiots present. It's time the government started listening to its voters, otherwise we will have a Trump situation in future. Also, it's the hypocrisy that stings, mainly entitled public school sixth formers who don't really know about the world. Champagne socialism at its best. I don't give a hoot about them or the 'burning world'

sashh · 20/07/2024 05:11

Whatjemimadid · 20/07/2024 01:50

Yes to all your points but especially that inaction causes more disruption.

Extreme unseasonable floods cause road, rail, business and housing disruption.

The insanely hot summer of 22 melted roads and warped train tracks. Much disruption

Looking at hotter countries this happens tenfold and is an indication of what happens next here.

Why don't they do something to get their message across without disruption?

Next time there is a flood why don't they turn up to rescue people, or help out in shelter when people have been evacuated to?

Userxyd · 20/07/2024 05:21

In Australia years ago when the rail staff went on strike they still worked, just left the gates open so everyone travelled for free - everyone was behind them!
If they could engineer a stunt like that it might get people on board

GoldFrame · 20/07/2024 05:28

The consequence of their actions were very serious. I think the sentences are wholly justified. They also took up loads of court time with rambling statements that were not relevant to their defence.

I think they are actively harming their cause, as no one is going to persuaded by their actions to decide climate change is an urgent issue.

No more Protest
ShouldhavebeencalledAppollo · 20/07/2024 05:29

They haven't been jailed for peaceful protest. They have been jailed because they continue to cause public disruption.

Which does, precisely, nothing for their cause. But causes the general public immense problems and costs a fortune. They aren't achieving anything.

In my opinion the vast majority don't even care about their cause. It's a convenient excuse to cause disruption and chaos and still claim to be morally superior.

GoldFrame · 20/07/2024 05:32

I’ve read RHs lengthy description of the court case and don’t think he helped himself there either.

The fact that they all ended up representing themselves is telling. It is likely that they did not listen to legal advice

ThisOldThang · 20/07/2024 05:49

Userxyd · 20/07/2024 05:21

In Australia years ago when the rail staff went on strike they still worked, just left the gates open so everyone travelled for free - everyone was behind them!
If they could engineer a stunt like that it might get people on board

I was travelling home one day and the idiots glued themselves to the Tube carriage doors. Everybody on the platform was attempting to use public transport to get home. Isn't that what we're supposed to do to reduce emissions?

They're just a bunch of spoilt brats that don't have a clue about life or science for that matter.

Zanatdy · 20/07/2024 05:51

People can protest, but when you shut down the countries motorways causing people to miss holidays, weddings, funerals, bedside of dying relatives and cost the country a fortune, prepare for a lengthy sentence. I don’t think the sentence is excessive at all and it doesn’t make me think people cannot protest. As peaceful protests are not punishable. These guys took it way too far

lightinthebox · 20/07/2024 05:57

They were jailed for planning a protest. What’s to stop people being jailed in the future now just because police think they may be planning a protest?

This isn’t about Just Stop Oil, this is about democracy and the right to protest.

OP posts:
Orchidflower1 · 20/07/2024 06:07

The planning the protest wasn’t the issue - it was conducting a protest that caused massive infrastructure disruption and cost vast amounts of money. They knew the risks in doing what they did.

Protest yes- disruption like that no.

well deserved punishment.

ShouldhavebeencalledAppollo · 20/07/2024 06:30

lightinthebox · 20/07/2024 05:57

They were jailed for planning a protest. What’s to stop people being jailed in the future now just because police think they may be planning a protest?

This isn’t about Just Stop Oil, this is about democracy and the right to protest.

What protest were they planning?

What exactly were they planning?

lightinthebox · 20/07/2024 06:30

I truly hope people who think this extortionate jail sentence is deserved never feel the need to protest about something they care deeply about.

Just Stop Oil are an easy target to push through dangerous curtails to freedom.

OP posts:
Theunamedcat · 20/07/2024 06:43

Punishing the public achieves nothing the public cannot stop climate change they cannot dictates government policy they cannot change a dam thing there are thousands of people out there that would love to use their car less hell I learned to drive in my 40s BECAUSE we have poor transport services and I needed to get places I literally cannot get my children to a hospital without a car not even an emergency just a regular appointment ffs

What have just stop oil achieved

XChrome · 20/07/2024 07:50

Here's a thought experiment. Suppose you drive a gas guzzling SUV. You could afford an electric car, but you choose the SUV. Since we know for a fact that having a large carbon footprint is killing the planet and therefore every species on it, why is that not considered violence?
Is it just because you think these deaths are too far off in the future to count as a direct effect? Well, they aren't. It's happening right now.
So explain to me (those of you with a large carbon footprint) why you are so much better than JSO. Aren't you being hypocrites?

SD1978 · 20/07/2024 07:53

It's not peaceful though. It's disruptive and potentially dangerous- to them and others. It falls under terrorism, not right to protest and I fully agree.

EmpressOfTheThread · 20/07/2024 07:54

I can't afford a gas guzzler, never could. They're punishing ordinary people rather than the big guys because it's easier and more news worthy.