Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To actually feel sorry for the woman driving the car in the Wimbledon car accident

994 replies

bagpuss90 · 06/07/2024 16:44

I’m sure I’ll be flamed here . I totally sympathise with the bereaved parents- I can’t stress that enough. I can understand them wanting justice . As we know the driver of the car suffered an epileptic seizure at the wheel - she had no history of epilepsy. I don’t see what she could have done differently. She has to live with what she did although it wasn’t her fault. AIBU to feel quite sorry for her ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 22:37

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 22:33

In essence this woman is relying on her private medical information to avoid a public, criminal charge for killing these two girls. That obviously makes it of intense interest to the families and friends of those killed and injured and blurs the line between the private and the public. While they may not be entitled to review the private medical information and she may be entitled to keep it private, they are right to state publicly in uncategorical terms that they are unconvinced that justice has been done. How can they be convinced? They haven't seen the evidence and it hasn't been examined by a court.

It has been examined by the CPS, whose job it is to examine evidence such as this to determine whether a crime has been committed that can be prosecuted in a court of law.

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 22:39

ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 22:37

It has been examined by the CPS, whose job it is to examine evidence such as this to determine whether a crime has been committed that can be prosecuted in a court of law.

And the school and the families are saying loud and clear that they don't have confidence in the police investigation or the CPS decision.

They are entitled to do so.

ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 22:42

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 22:39

And the school and the families are saying loud and clear that they don't have confidence in the police investigation or the CPS decision.

They are entitled to do so.

Of course they are, they are entitled to say whatever they want, to whomever they want.
They are, however, not entitled to demand anyone’s private medical information, or to have a bespoke criminal justice process created for this specific case. The CPS have reviewed the evidence and decided that no crime has been committed. They make this sort of decision every single day.

marigoldandrose · 06/07/2024 22:44

@GoFigure235 yours has got to be one of the most ridiculous comments. The woman is not using her medical information to avoid a prosecution that wording is extremely misleading. It's the police/CPS who've made the decision it's not in the public interest to prosecute. It's completely different

Janeb1965 · 06/07/2024 22:46

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 17:11

I think it's a very convenient diagnosis - human brain is so complex, they can't prove she didn't have a seizure. Never heard of a person diagnosed with epilepsy at 40 though - I believe if you have it, it starts at the childhood.

This driver lives in a detached house in Wimbledon (worth millions in that area) and her car was not the cheapest one so apparently she could afford good lawyer and suitable diagnosis.

Edited

Ridiculous and absolutely untrue. My BIL had a seizure when he was 51. Came from nowhere, no history. Initially diagnosed as not epilepsy but no other known or obvious cause. He stopped driving whilst this was under investigation and just as he was told it wasn't epilepsy he had a very serious fit and ended up in hospital for a number of days, both for tests and because of the damage he did to himself. He was put on epilepsy medication and not able to drive for 12 months. He hasn't had a fit since but whilst he could drive now he very rarely does.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 06/07/2024 22:49

NeverDropYourMooncup · 06/07/2024 22:27

Bottom of the article.

Might also help to know that the interior designer posted photos in their online portfolio in April-May 2023 (it's viewable in the source code).

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 22:50

marigoldandrose · 06/07/2024 22:44

@GoFigure235 yours has got to be one of the most ridiculous comments. The woman is not using her medical information to avoid a prosecution that wording is extremely misleading. It's the police/CPS who've made the decision it's not in the public interest to prosecute. It's completely different

People are entitled publicly to disagree with the CPS decision on the basis that the medical evidence hasn't been examined in court.

ThePerkyDuck · 06/07/2024 22:51

marigoldandrose · 06/07/2024 22:44

@GoFigure235 yours has got to be one of the most ridiculous comments. The woman is not using her medical information to avoid a prosecution that wording is extremely misleading. It's the police/CPS who've made the decision it's not in the public interest to prosecute. It's completely different

I would argue about the ridiculous comment. Police don’t decide to prosecute unless it’s a petty crime like shoplifting. Police only gather evidence. CPS only decides and I understand that they can give the medical evidence to the parents with the drivers consent.

friendlycat · 06/07/2024 22:52

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 17:11

I think it's a very convenient diagnosis - human brain is so complex, they can't prove she didn't have a seizure. Never heard of a person diagnosed with epilepsy at 40 though - I believe if you have it, it starts at the childhood.

This driver lives in a detached house in Wimbledon (worth millions in that area) and her car was not the cheapest one so apparently she could afford good lawyer and suitable diagnosis.

Edited

You are really showing your ignorance here regarding seizures.

I think you will also find that her living in a detached house in Wimbledon has no relevance whatsoever. I should imagine that the poor parents of the sadly deceased also live in a detached house in Wimbledon as well. It is wholly inappropriate to discuss what property any of those involved live in. Shame on you.

khaa2091 · 06/07/2024 22:54

My sister developed epilepsy (and lost her driving licence) at 35. No preceding signs / history.

ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 22:55

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 22:50

People are entitled publicly to disagree with the CPS decision on the basis that the medical evidence hasn't been examined in court.

To create a mechanism to examine the evidence in court, despite the CPS deciding that no crime has been committed, would mean dismantling our entire criminal justice system as it currently exists and creating an entirely new process.

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 23:06

ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 22:55

To create a mechanism to examine the evidence in court, despite the CPS deciding that no crime has been committed, would mean dismantling our entire criminal justice system as it currently exists and creating an entirely new process.

I get this.

But the school/families are entitled to be very publicly pissed off about this given that their experiences with the CPS/police have obviously led them to have very little faith in the investigation. They might presumably have accepted that quietly had a prosecution proceeded, but now there is no prosecution they're presumably refusing to take it lying down and are going to kick up as much fuss as they can. Which is their right.

lemmein · 06/07/2024 23:11

I was confused by your opening line 'I’m sure I’ll be flamed here' OP as I couldn't imagine anybody not feeling sympathy for someone who caused such an horrific tragedy because of a medical event. Though you haven't been flamed, it seems your apprehension wasn't misplaced - I had no idea this tragedy was so 'polarising' as a pp put it.

I feel even more sorry for the driver reading some of these posts and I think it's really shit of the school to imply there's more to it and cause further speculation about a woman who is probably going through hell too. There's nothing to suggest this was intentional, or a result of negligent/dangerous driving - I don't care how fancy your house is, or how big your car is, waking up to carnage and knowing you've caused the death of 2 small children is an unimaginable burden. You are not being unreasonable at all feeling sorry for her.

PossumintheHouse · 06/07/2024 23:16

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 23:06

I get this.

But the school/families are entitled to be very publicly pissed off about this given that their experiences with the CPS/police have obviously led them to have very little faith in the investigation. They might presumably have accepted that quietly had a prosecution proceeded, but now there is no prosecution they're presumably refusing to take it lying down and are going to kick up as much fuss as they can. Which is their right.

What? So your logic is they would have been quiet if a nonsense prosecution had proceeded? But the fact there is no case for a prosecution means they'll just shout about it?

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 23:20

PossumintheHouse · 06/07/2024 23:16

What? So your logic is they would have been quiet if a nonsense prosecution had proceeded? But the fact there is no case for a prosecution means they'll just shout about it?

They're clearly unhappy with the process that led to the CPS decision and they're entitled to make that as public as they like.

And it's obviously having an impact, given the investigation is now being reviewed.

oakleaffy · 06/07/2024 23:25

ExterminatingAngel · 06/07/2024 20:08

I agree. These cars are so big. I’m in the states where they are very popular. The messed up thing is that in order to feel safe yourself you need to get a bigger car. I wish people wouldn’t get these vehicles in the first place

It's usually nervous drivers who are drawn to them because they feel ''Safe''- but heaven help the people they hit.

They have no need for them in suburbia.

oakleaffy · 06/07/2024 23:28

lemmein · 06/07/2024 23:11

I was confused by your opening line 'I’m sure I’ll be flamed here' OP as I couldn't imagine anybody not feeling sympathy for someone who caused such an horrific tragedy because of a medical event. Though you haven't been flamed, it seems your apprehension wasn't misplaced - I had no idea this tragedy was so 'polarising' as a pp put it.

I feel even more sorry for the driver reading some of these posts and I think it's really shit of the school to imply there's more to it and cause further speculation about a woman who is probably going through hell too. There's nothing to suggest this was intentional, or a result of negligent/dangerous driving - I don't care how fancy your house is, or how big your car is, waking up to carnage and knowing you've caused the death of 2 small children is an unimaginable burden. You are not being unreasonable at all feeling sorry for her.

I hope they test her for ''recreational substances'', too. They can bring on seizures.

https://www.nationalepilepsytraining.co.uk/can-taking-cocaine-cause-seizures/

“Can Taking Cocaine Cause Seizures?” - National Epilepsy Training

Taking cocaine, like many recreational drugs, can have a number of negative health effects. For cocaine, one of the concerns that many people often ask is “can taking cocaine cause seizures?”. In short, yes, cocaine can cause seizures and can also be a...

https://www.nationalepilepsytraining.co.uk/can-taking-cocaine-cause-seizures

lemmein · 06/07/2024 23:31

I hope they test her for ''recreational substances'', too. They can bring on seizures.

You don't think they've done that already? 🙃

wagram · 06/07/2024 23:32

ItsAlrightDarling · 06/07/2024 21:38

Because it’s a defining principle of our society that medical information is confidential.

And yet you have to disclose all sort of medical information to random insurance companies, so not so much of a defining principle after all.

We get it @ItsAlrightDarling you think the parents should accept the unfailable police's conclusions and that they are not to see any evidence for it. They should stop asking questions and move along. Nothing to see here.

HungryLittleCrocodile · 06/07/2024 23:33

PossumintheHouse · 06/07/2024 22:33

There is a massive difference between a prolonged and calculated incident of harassment and an unexpected epileptic fit.

Did you actually even read my post properly? My point is that people will do - and say - ANYthing to try to avoid a jail term. A previous poster said that some people are self serving, and will lie to protect themselves rather than face justice, (when some people had suggested that this woman may have lied to get herself off this charge of death by dangerous driving.)

And I said 'of course they will. MOST people will try anything to get out of a jail term. Then I mentioned this woman who lied and laid on depression etc to avoid a prison sentence. So the massive difference between the 2 things happening is irrelevant, as that's not what I was on about.

Podcast84 · 06/07/2024 23:46

She could have had a seizure at home and just never reported it. Everyone is going by her word that she has never had a seizure.

CreateUserNames · 06/07/2024 23:47

LolaLouise · 06/07/2024 20:41

Speaking as an A&E nurse, if she was immediately taken to hospital, there is a blood test that shows a seizure has happened. Its a very common, easy, diagnostic test and shows whether it was a "functional" or non-epileptic seizure - which can appear very much like an epileptic seizure, or an actual seizure that needs acting upon, which isn't always epileptic either. But it can be used to diagnose a seizure has occurred. That medical testing would have been given to investigators, as it would be on her records. Without knowing the ins and outs of this particular person, or their medical history, i would hazard a guess, that the testing showed an actual seizure had occurred in the time leading up to the accident. Therefore, provable, and would not lead to any kind of charges or conviction.

Hopefully the evidences will be shared with the families and others have been impacted.

iamtheblcksheep · 06/07/2024 23:47

Podcast84 · 06/07/2024 23:46

She could have had a seizure at home and just never reported it. Everyone is going by her word that she has never had a seizure.

Don’t be ridiculous

wayfairer · 06/07/2024 23:48

TennisLady · 06/07/2024 18:56

@BobbyBiscuits is a “strong enough punishment” not having to live the rest of your life knowing you unwillingly killed 2 children? I think most would struggle with that.

She doesn't have to live with it. She claims she doesn't remember. How can you feel sad or guilt of you don't think or remember doing anything awful? For those claiming we should just accept what the police cps say well all I can think is you just not ever have had to deal with the pencil pushers and corrupt ones! Must have had your eyes shut for the last 10 years too! The amount of corruption/ double standards and immoral brush under the carpet or drag it out till the fervour dies down that happens in the UK is a joke. Be grateful if you've not had to deal with it.

lemmein · 06/07/2024 23:49

Podcast84 · 06/07/2024 23:46

She could have had a seizure at home and just never reported it. Everyone is going by her word that she has never had a seizure.

And she might be telling the truth?

Why are people so determined to see this as anything but a tragic accident? I don't understand.