Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that improving state schools needs people to pay an e.g. a state school tax?

361 replies

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 13:36

What with the current hoo ha about VAT on private school and commentary about equality and privilege.. wouldn’t it make sense to vastly improve state schools? And in order to do so obviously the government needs more cash.

Isn’t it reasonable therefore to ask anyone using state schools, to pay a bit of tax for that, in order to improve all said schools from their (often) current dire state?

OP posts:
Sherrystrull · 28/05/2024 17:10

I think paying for A and E is a good idea. I was shocked when I was there recently after a bad accident that so many people at the desk were complaining of such minor ailments.

Namefortodayandtomorrow · 28/05/2024 17:12

Our kids attend a local state secondary that we have been very happy with after private primary that we were not totally happy with. We give the school a monthly donation of £100 to help towards their costs and know other parents also make regular and ad hoc donations. The teaching at the state secondary has generally been better than what we experienced at private school.

Combattingthemoaners · 28/05/2024 17:19

You could increase taxation all you like but until we have a government who prioritises education nothing will change. Our current government don’t care about the kids who attend state schools.

TheDefiant · 28/05/2024 17:19

Namefortodayandtomorrow · 28/05/2024 17:12

Our kids attend a local state secondary that we have been very happy with after private primary that we were not totally happy with. We give the school a monthly donation of £100 to help towards their costs and know other parents also make regular and ad hoc donations. The teaching at the state secondary has generally been better than what we experienced at private school.

The HT of our local comprehensive has interviewed many teachers leaving the private sector. The majority do not have the skills required to teach at all and have been benefiting from the private experience in a different way!

Ultimately I think that it comes down to personal responsibility. More people need to take personal responsibility for themselves and their family. Health and education being 2 of the areas where taking increased personal responsibility (genuine need/challenges aside) can have dramatic and worthwhile impact.

Demonhunter · 28/05/2024 17:19

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 14:06

I don’t want to pay for your kids! I’m a higher rate tax payer, don’t use the nhs or state schools. How much of money do you actually want?

And before you start calling me every name under the sun. Not too many years ago I was homeless. Call me privelaged. I dare you.

I Did It Ifc GIF by Film Independent Spirit Awards

I'll call you privileged, does that count?

Combattingthemoaners · 28/05/2024 17:33

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 14:06

I don’t want to pay for your kids! I’m a higher rate tax payer, don’t use the nhs or state schools. How much of money do you actually want?

And before you start calling me every name under the sun. Not too many years ago I was homeless. Call me privelaged. I dare you.

Being so anti-state, I am curious as to how you got out of your homeless situation?

OvalLemon · 28/05/2024 17:34

pizzaHeart · 28/05/2024 13:44

My child is out of school already (it’s a state school) but in general our family wouldn’t mind paying more in taxes to get not only schools but also NHS better and more functional. The main caveat is that the taxing should be fair so it should affect those who really rich, not a single mum who worked her arse off and got to the 57k salary or someone getting 65k with the other parent at home struggling to home school 2 out of 3 children with additional needs who didn’t get school places (it’s not me, it’s an example from friends situations)
Just a thought.

It should be fair… so only tax those who earn more than me .. 🙄 I have had enough of these threads.

RoseMarigoldViolet · 28/05/2024 17:47

We have always donated to the state schools that our children attend, and it certainly seems that the schools rely on parents to donate if they can afford to. It is openly acknowledged that the state funding is insufficient.

longdistanceclaraclara · 28/05/2024 17:49

DustyMaiden · 28/05/2024 13:43

The schools here ask parents to set up a direct debit to pay towards their funds.

Same here and we are asked to pay for consumables for art, tech and science at the start of each term.

TheDefiant · 28/05/2024 17:53

In Scotland there is guidance against asking families for the cost of consumables for any subject. All under "cost of the school day" work. Efforts to reduce the cost of the school day a make it more equitable for all.

S33dHead · 28/05/2024 17:57

Sherrystrull · 28/05/2024 17:10

I think paying for A and E is a good idea. I was shocked when I was there recently after a bad accident that so many people at the desk were complaining of such minor ailments.

I don’t. Some of us have children who have conditions that require frequent admissions and trips to A&E. poorer parents would be put off doing what the NHS wants them to and their child needs them to do.

LadyWhistledownMarkTwo · 28/05/2024 17:59

We already pay tax and NI so, no thanks.

makeanddo · 28/05/2024 17:59

My post was not supposed to be threatening at all. Purely, and you can see already how many contribute, that not only could the VAT spectacularly backfire but the state seems system needs levelling up not the PS pulling down.

I'm sorry but PS parents will shout louder, not a threat, a fact. Labour are saying the money will go to state education, what else are they going to do to level up the state system and help deprived areas? How about expecting the rich academies with all their rich parents to provide outreach like they do the PS? I suspect PS will stop all that now as there's no need.

5128gap · 28/05/2024 18:00

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 14:06

I don’t want to pay for your kids! I’m a higher rate tax payer, don’t use the nhs or state schools. How much of money do you actually want?

And before you start calling me every name under the sun. Not too many years ago I was homeless. Call me privelaged. I dare you.

Its very possible the previous generation didn't want to pay for your education, and may not feel that was their money well spent.

Kpo58 · 28/05/2024 18:02

I want to know what on earth the government are spending the money on as it doesn't appear to be on Education/NHS/Police/Housing/other infrastructure that is needed for a functioning society.

TheaBrandt · 28/05/2024 18:21

Agree with many others more is needed than money being thrown at the problem.

Also the resentment at the “good” state schools - most cities have very mixed housing even the leafiest state school will be more demographically mixed than a private school. Good state schools also don’t get contextual offers from universities (rightly so) but have the other negatives of state (stuck with difficult pupils /teacher retention) so arguably they have worst of all worlds - if that makes you feel better!

Itloggedmeoutagain · 28/05/2024 18:33

Sherrystrull · 28/05/2024 17:10

I think paying for A and E is a good idea. I was shocked when I was there recently after a bad accident that so many people at the desk were complaining of such minor ailments.

So how much would you think is fair?
What's not much to one person could be prohibitive to the next. Someone can still be on relatively low income but paying tax. Once they've paid for the roof over their head and the food on the table there's not much left.

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 19:23

S0livagant · 28/05/2024 16:01

Not really, as the way vehicle tax works means some pay nothing for their car. I only pay £20 myself, that's not going to fill many potholes.

I wasn’t talking about the value but the principle of paying additional taxes for services you use but others don’t.

S0livagant · 28/05/2024 19:43

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 19:23

I wasn’t talking about the value but the principle of paying additional taxes for services you use but others don’t.

If it's zero then you aren't paying any tax for the service you use. You pay to pollute, not to use any service.

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 28/05/2024 19:50

State schools were perfectly good by the end of the last Labour administration. The Tories chose to destroy all the good work that had been done.

Floatingvoternolandinsight · 28/05/2024 20:31

Itloggedmeoutagain · 28/05/2024 18:33

So how much would you think is fair?
What's not much to one person could be prohibitive to the next. Someone can still be on relatively low income but paying tax. Once they've paid for the roof over their head and the food on the table there's not much left.

Many of those people are there because 111 told them to go after triaging them on the phone.

Narwhalsh · 28/05/2024 20:34

Taxpayers are not getting good return on their investment. They haven’t for years. Civil service and governmental agencies need proper reform to make them efficient and fit for purpose.

I do not want to pay more tax because ultimately it will get squandered.

Show me a government that can balance the books and I will possibly reconsider

Kellykukoo · 28/05/2024 20:36

HappierTimesAhead · 28/05/2024 14:15

It's not a debate though, it's just a ridiculous thought that came into your head and you decided to start a thread about. You are just pissed that you have to pay more. It doesn't mean that those of us that access state education should have to start paying for something that should be funded by the state.

Not as ridiculous a thought as taxing parents who already contribute much higher income tax than most people do to the public purse and who also save the state the 7000 odd pounds a year to educate their child or multiple children.
I wonder why is it more palatable to have someone else sacrifice yet more money to fund not only their children but also your children's education. You can't conceive sacrificing a bit of money to the school to educate your own child to the standard you are after.
There's just so much entitlement in the UK that it results in this hopelessly regressive labour policy.

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 20:36

Yep. In a shitty northern mining village where you were lucky to escape

WindsurfingDreams · 28/05/2024 20:38

Kellykukoo · 28/05/2024 20:36

Not as ridiculous a thought as taxing parents who already contribute much higher income tax than most people do to the public purse and who also save the state the 7000 odd pounds a year to educate their child or multiple children.
I wonder why is it more palatable to have someone else sacrifice yet more money to fund not only their children but also your children's education. You can't conceive sacrificing a bit of money to the school to educate your own child to the standard you are after.
There's just so much entitlement in the UK that it results in this hopelessly regressive labour policy.

But I thought private school parents were all low earners scraping by, and all the high income tax payers had mansions in sought after state catchments?