Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that improving state schools needs people to pay an e.g. a state school tax?

361 replies

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 13:36

What with the current hoo ha about VAT on private school and commentary about equality and privilege.. wouldn’t it make sense to vastly improve state schools? And in order to do so obviously the government needs more cash.

Isn’t it reasonable therefore to ask anyone using state schools, to pay a bit of tax for that, in order to improve all said schools from their (often) current dire state?

OP posts:
SpinyNorma · 28/05/2024 14:07

Wouldn't be against a council tax surcharge on properties above a certain value in catchment areas of outstanding schools that is used to fund other schools in the area.

itsgettingweird · 28/05/2024 14:07

We pay taxes. They go towards education.

Not enough. But they manage to find the money for their mates.

Proper accountability would be a better thing.

And why should state school,users pay 20% VAT. They've not chosen to buy an alternative education.

Perhaps when those who can afford to pay for independent education are forced to use the state system there will be improvements because the 'right people' suddenly care?

beergiggles · 28/05/2024 14:07

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 14:06

I don’t want to pay for your kids! I’m a higher rate tax payer, don’t use the nhs or state schools. How much of money do you actually want?

And before you start calling me every name under the sun. Not too many years ago I was homeless. Call me privelaged. I dare you.

You still benefit enormously from the fact that there is a free education system and that there is health care for people who can't afford private health care.

HeraSyndulla · 28/05/2024 14:08

Maddy70 · 28/05/2024 13:51

There is money already they just need to redistribute it. If they tax the billionaire properly its affordable

How many billionaires do you think there are in this country ?. And if you were that wealthy , then you'd just leave, wouldn't you !!!!!. Besides most of their wealth is held off shore, spread though numerous shell companies and private investments. Their not stupid.

MagnetCarHair · 28/05/2024 14:08

iamtheblcksheep · 28/05/2024 14:06

I don’t want to pay for your kids! I’m a higher rate tax payer, don’t use the nhs or state schools. How much of money do you actually want?

And before you start calling me every name under the sun. Not too many years ago I was homeless. Call me privelaged. I dare you.

Privileged wasn't the adjective that immediately sprung to mind.

Einwegflasche · 28/05/2024 14:08

edwinbear · 28/05/2024 13:42

Completely agree OP. Be interesting to see how state school parents would react if they had 6 weeks notice to cough up 20% VAT on the £7k the state pays for their DC's education. Multiplied by however many DC they have. Don't expect they'd be quite so enthusiastic on taxing children's education then.

....and the entitled and privileged bubble comments continue on this thread.

S0livagant · 28/05/2024 14:10

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 14:05

Roads are covered by road tax which you pay for every vehicle so there is already an additional charge to users.

Do you mean vehicle tax? Many cars are zero rate, mine is £20 a year.

Einwegflasche · 28/05/2024 14:10

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 13:47

What on earth are you talking about?

People clearly embarrassing themselves - she isn't wrong.

WaitingfortheTardis · 28/05/2024 14:10

I think they need to spend the taxes they already raise far more wisely. There need to be far more stringent checks to ensure money doesn't end up filtered off as easily as it seems to be currently.

JassyRadlett · 28/05/2024 14:10

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 14:05

Roads are covered by road tax which you pay for every vehicle so there is already an additional charge to users.

There 👏 is 👏no👏 such 👏thing👏as👏road👏tax👏.

VED is essentially a polluter pays, not user pays model.

Bushmillsbabe · 28/05/2024 14:11

OpusGiemuJavlo · 28/05/2024 14:03

I think there should be a premium land value tax on homes within the catchment areas of naice schools.

We live in a small ex-council semi in a grotty area of town where the catchment school and all other potentially accessible schools are crap, with low aspirations and very poor records on pupil safety with virtually no one getting into good universities. A house of the same size in the naice area of town with an outstanding comp that regularly gets top results and high levels of acceptance at top universities would be about £250,000 more expensive so obviously only the wealthy can access that privilege. I would like to see that £250,000 of bonus property value taxed to help pay to bring the struggling schools up to scratch.

It is taxed! Via stamp duty and council tax, both of which are based on property value

HandaFae · 28/05/2024 14:11

Perhaps we can ask for the billions the Tory government wasted (gave to their mates) back.

I'd be happy to pay higher taxes to support any of the services that should be available to us in this country.

OnceICaughtACold · 28/05/2024 14:11

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 14:05

Roads are covered by road tax which you pay for every vehicle so there is already an additional charge to users.

There is no such thing as “road tax”. There is a vehicle tax, the level of which is determined by the emissions level of the vehicle. The tax raised goes in to the general tax coffers of the treasury. My car, for example, has a tax rate of £0.

Northernnature · 28/05/2024 14:12

I think there is a massive amount of entitlement in this country. In some African countries children walk miles to get an education and it is really valued while here parents abuse teachers and there is alot of poor behaviour. I think everyone should pay an upfront payment for education (same for health) as at the moment they think of it as "free" so take for granted.

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 14:12

K0OLA1D · 28/05/2024 13:56

I've always said I'd pay more tax if it was guaranteed to go to education and the NHS

Exactly.

OP posts:
TheDefiant · 28/05/2024 14:12

Maybe people who benefit from those educated at state schools should pay extra tax too? You know for the roads those people built that we drive on. For being staff at services we use (cinema, cafe) for being staff in the NHS, military and emergency services?

Honestly this is such a silly question OP. Education should be well funded. As should many others things. Money isn't an infinite resource.

Einwegflasche · 28/05/2024 14:12

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 13:59

Maybe child benefit could be diverted to schools to reallocate funding for children rather than impose an additional tax?

That would plunge already struggling people deeper into poverty.

beetr00 · 28/05/2024 14:13

PerfectForEloping · 28/05/2024 13:49

I think the government needs to stop mismanaging the money they do have got a start and then see where we are. You can’t keep taxing people more and then wasting it.

Totally agree with this.

OpusGiemuJavlo · 28/05/2024 14:13

@Floatingvoternolandinsight Not very relevant but it was bought from the council by its previous occupants under right to buy as they had lived there since the 1960s and bought it in the 1980s then continued to live in it till they died over a decade ago at which time it was marketed by their executors and we bought it. About 40% of homes originally built as council housing are now privately owned but they tend to be a lower price-point than houses of the same size built for the open market and are hence more affordable - it was certainly all we could afford when we bought.

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 14:13

Chocochoo · 28/05/2024 13:56

I think this might be one of the stupidest ideas I’ve ever read on here.

Ok Sherlock. How would you solve the issue with state schools?

OP posts:
Bewareofthisonetoo · 28/05/2024 14:13

StormingNorman · 28/05/2024 13:59

Maybe child benefit could be diverted to schools to reallocate funding for children rather than impose an additional tax?

This

mrssunshinexxx · 28/05/2024 14:13

@edwinbear well said

JassyRadlett · 28/05/2024 14:14

SpinyNorma · 28/05/2024 14:07

Wouldn't be against a council tax surcharge on properties above a certain value in catchment areas of outstanding schools that is used to fund other schools in the area.

I'd rather have proper admissions reform rather that economically segregate schools even further.

Taxation by catchment would be near impossible in a lot of areas without defined catchments and with declining student population. What if you bought a house out of catchment knowing you couldn't afford the surcharge, and five years later your house was within the admissions area?

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 14:14

Meadowfinch · 28/05/2024 13:58

I think it will take more than that. I think state schools need....

More cash to pay teachers & other staff properly
More SEN provision
More PRUs so that disruptive pupils can be separated out and taught separately as their needs dictate
A period of consistency, with no changes to curricula
To remove the straight-jacket of control over every tiny aspect of teaching, that makes it a joyless misery.
Repairs to school facilities.

Then we might get somewhere.

Agreed. Where dues the money come from to do all that?

OP posts:
Itloggedmeoutagain · 28/05/2024 14:14

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 28/05/2024 14:12

Exactly.

But this is not quite what's being suggested is it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread