Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

175k salary and all gone

1000 replies

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:02

This will ruffle some feathers, but after tax, mortgage , childcare, living expenses….there doesn’t seem much left. SE London, commuting, wrap around care. Whilst I appreciate I’m not having to watch my bills I’m hardly living an extravagant lifestyle.

OP posts:
Differentstarts · 26/05/2024 16:09

The difference between someone on a £175 grand salary and a 20 grand salary is you have choices you can move home, reduce hours, be a sahm, use a different form of childcare all these would save you money. Others don't have the luxury to solve these problems.

BaBaBlackBerry9 · 26/05/2024 16:10

I do feel for you OP.

Your mortgage payment is massive. Interest rates are high right now. Your childcare bill is ridiculous. As some say, perhaps one, or both of you can drop a day a week at work?

It will get easier when the kids go to school, just don't go private!

Can you overpay your mortgage, to get it down?

Rent a room out?

Emptyjars · 26/05/2024 16:11

Everyone should learn to live within their means, no use earning that amount if you've over committed yourself.

jannier · 26/05/2024 16:13

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:39

How do you manage?

Spend less because we've got a lot less to spend.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:19

rwalker · 26/05/2024 05:31

people are blinded when the see 175k

but to busy sticking the knife in to realise
you'll pay
71k deductions
9k pension
leaving you 95k take home in your hand
48k child care
30k mortgage
leaving 17k a year to live on which is comparable to someone on benefits

would it be cheaper to employ a full time nanny instead of nursery

Edited

Haahahaha! Yes, I’m sure they’re living exactly the same lifestyle as someone on benefits. Great analogy! (If you ignore the big fancy house in London, which they own, the good quality childcare, the stinking huge pension pot which gives them an amazing lifestyle even after retirement, and the fact that in no amount of time they will have £4k just lying around each month to spend on whatever they want.)

What planet do you live on?

Porridgeislife · 26/05/2024 16:24

TheBestFriend · 26/05/2024 15:34

How old are your kids? And what are you getting for your money in terms of the childcare?
If your kids are pre-school age, surely you could just hire a nanny and spend less than 4K a month on that, getting more for your money at the same time.
Live-in au-pair?

In London a FT nanny to replace 7.30-6.00pm would exceed £4K a month for 2 preschoolers once you factor in employer on costs, plus heating your home, paying for classes/activities, food and nappies.

Au pairs are now entitled to minimum wage and it’s very hard to recruit them due to only Australians/Kiwis/Canadians qualifying for a suitable visa. Also, leaving your child for 11 hours a day with an unqualified 20yo with not enough experience to take on a much better paid role as a junior nanny isn’t a great way to raise your child.

Wisenotboring · 26/05/2024 16:26

You have a massive mortgage and massive childcare. Those things are a choice. The childcare will end in due course.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:28

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 10:07

Yep but let’s all hate on the high earners as usual on MN, even though they are paying for the majority of public services in tax!

So what if they do? Are they really “worth” more than any of the rest of us? Are they really that much more skilled, or talented, or harder workers? Why shouldn’t they put a bit more into the pot if they can? It’s all part of being part of society. One which still benefits them myriad ways. And rarely effects their day to day lives in any meaningful way.

Tight fisted-ness is such an unpleasant quality in a person. Much more so in a society.

rwalker · 26/05/2024 16:29

PottedPlantCrazy · 26/05/2024 06:59

I feel that the lack of awareness is astounding.

It is isn’t it people are totally unaware they’ll pay over 70k in deductions roughly twice as much as the average person earns
zero help to children care unlike many of us there paying £48k a year
so there left with 50k which isn’t a bus ride from someone working full time with partner working PT and then getting help with childcare
people just see the 175k and slag them off

Otherstories2002 · 26/05/2024 16:30

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:10

Take home after tax and pension ~8500. Mortgage 2.5k, childcare £4K, bills and commuting ~£1k

Of course it will ruffle feathers but I hear you.

Otherstories2002 · 26/05/2024 16:31

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:19

Haahahaha! Yes, I’m sure they’re living exactly the same lifestyle as someone on benefits. Great analogy! (If you ignore the big fancy house in London, which they own, the good quality childcare, the stinking huge pension pot which gives them an amazing lifestyle even after retirement, and the fact that in no amount of time they will have £4k just lying around each month to spend on whatever they want.)

What planet do you live on?

You aren’t getting a big fancy house for that mortgage payment. Not even close.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:31

EverythingYouDoIsaBalloon · 26/05/2024 14:16

So, going by your so-called logic, the disabled are disenfranchised, lazy and unable. So are the chronically ill. So are those who can't work because they are caring for others. So are those whose job opportunities are constrained by natural limitations to their intelligence or ability.

Yeah, I won't be buying into your so-called value system any time soon.

You do realise that according to your 'logic' a lot of people who do the jobs many people (and probably you) think they're too good for, are 'disenfranchised, lazy and unable' simply because their jobs don't pay well? Would you like them all to stop doing their jobs overnight and all become City bankers overnight, because y'know, anyone who's not a high earner just isn't trying/working hard enough? Even if that were possible, I'm sure you'd be the first to complain when your surroundings were dirty or there were no nurses to care for you if you got ill, to name just a couple of examples.

If the system in this country is so unacceptable to you, there are plenty of other places in the world to live.

👏👏👏👏

Porridgeislife · 26/05/2024 16:32

Crunchymum · 26/05/2024 14:15

N1? (Or N5 or N7)

Almost everyone I know in Islington who has managed to buy have had to buy outside of N1 (cheaper)

Edited

A £2,400 mortgage definitely isn’t N1 and not the flash bits of N5 either. It’s “only” borrowing c £500k when interest rates were at their lowest.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:33

Otherstories2002 · 26/05/2024 16:31

You aren’t getting a big fancy house for that mortgage payment. Not even close.

The I would suggest the postcode is the issue. And the choice that out them in that postcode.

There are loads of places that I’d love to live within my city which are nicer, have better schools, closer to my work etc. I just can’t justify the mortgage retired to live there. So I don’t.

Porridgeislife · 26/05/2024 16:33

RhannionKPSS · 26/05/2024 13:54

Did you not think about the costs of childcare before you had children?

Nursery fees have gone up c 40% since Covid. No one should have to factor their child’s place almost doubling in 3 years.

Dibblydoodahdah · 26/05/2024 16:35

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:08

Well I would suggest she is less incredulous about the life she’s living I suppose.

you think most Londoners are paying £4k a month for childcare? Or £2.5k a month on a mortgage? Most aren’t even EARNING that.

so can we please stop pretending that these are entirely normal and necessary costs? They may be entirely normal and necessary for someone earning £175k a year and wanting to live in a big house in a nice bit of London, and wanting to work lots of hours, and wanting multiple children under a certain age close together, and wanting to still have more than £1k “leftover” each month after all costs are paid for.

but then it becomes entirely lifestyle choices, doesn’t it?

so the question is either silly, or disingenuous. Or both.

Edited

£2500 per month doesn’t buy you a big house in London. It would get you a tatty three bed terrace where I live and that’s 40 miles from London. Childcare is £1400-£1500 per month per child. Yes, some people in London will be paying less for childcare but they may also have the benefit of (1) taxfree childcare, (2) 30 free hours, (3) family help (4) UC part funded childcare. The OP doesn’t get (1), (2) or (4) because she earns too much. We don’t know about (3) but lots of us don’t get any family support.

Please list all the nurseries in reasonable travelling distance to OP and their fees so OP can see if there is something more reasonable.

WomanMumLoverDaughterStepmumFriend · 26/05/2024 16:36

How old are the kids ? Soon they will be going tos chill so childcare should be 70% less at least

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:37

Needtofixmyageingskin · 26/05/2024 14:45

Thought you'd get a hard time on here but I do know what you mean. Husband and I on joint income of approx 200k. Obviously taxed high. 3k a month mortgage. Childcare now approx 1600 a month (only one in nursery now and the other in after school). I know we earn well and we do eat what we want / go on two holidays a year / save a bit but don't have loads spare at the end of the month. We're in London too but not as expensive an area as Islington. Will be better when both kids are in school (assuming not private). Living in London is just expensive!

With kindness, you DO have “loads spare” at the end of each month, you just choose to spend it on lots of meals out and multiple holidays a year. Nothing at all wrong with that, it’s a nice way to live and I’d do the same. But I would never pretend that my only “spare” cash was that which I had after such abundant lovely lifestyle perks.

Porridgeislife · 26/05/2024 16:39

shuggles · 26/05/2024 13:47

A real job involves manufacturing or producing some kind of consumer good or item that people can actually use. Industry, manufacturing, science, engineering.

I have one of these jobs. I'm not sure what made you think that I don't.

Oh come off it. Those things you make still require legal involvement to make sure that companies and their workers are protected in various ways. They need accountants to make sure accounts are done properly and taxes are paid. They need marketers so that consumers actually find out and buy their products. They even need social media to ensure that younger people become aware of their products!

But sure, only people who “make something” have real jobs.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:40

EverythingYouDoIsaBalloon · 26/05/2024 13:57

'Less ambitious'? Fucking hell.

I know right? It’s sometimes hard to believe people like that exist, and yet they pop up depressingly regularly on sites like this. I’d bet my yearly salary from my horribly unambitious job that they vote Tory.

tigesa · 26/05/2024 16:43

WomanMumLoverDaughterStepmumFriend · 26/05/2024 15:23

Your mortgage is to high . Your childcare is way too high unless you have 5 children ?

@WomanMumLoverDaughterStepmumFriend

posts like these are so funny.

yes it is too high! That’s what the @175allgone is saying.

she’s not accidentally donating more money than she needs to her childcare or mortgage provider.

SapphireSlippers · 26/05/2024 16:44

Teatimeandbooks · 26/05/2024 14:52

OP we are v similar. 5k childcare 2 children nanny (know a luxury) but NW London nursery for 2 under 3 will be same cost. We have no holidays, no meals out, Tesco deliveries. One family day out a month. We will be worse off under Labour who might take away the tiny NI drops we got from the current state. We pay for everyone else’s childcare. Colleagues part time are way more extravagant. This is how it is in the U.K. I try and enjoy the small things and remember that working full time is a privilege.

So why do you do it?
Why not move out of London, get cheaper childcare, live an easier life

SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 16:45

what's the point of this thread now?

Op hasn't even come back once. And it's over 800 posts.

She's not even asked for advice.
It comes over as a stealth boast- doesn't need to watch the bills etc.

Enjoy arguing amongst yourselves, but no point trying to engage with her.

tigesa · 26/05/2024 16:46

SapphireSlippers · 26/05/2024 16:44

So why do you do it?
Why not move out of London, get cheaper childcare, live an easier life

@SapphireSlippers because people hope that working in well paid jobs will give a better lifestyle. Sadly if labour get in we may as well all give up!

Bestyearever2024 · 26/05/2024 16:47

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 16:08

Well I would suggest she is less incredulous about the life she’s living I suppose.

you think most Londoners are paying £4k a month for childcare? Or £2.5k a month on a mortgage? Most aren’t even EARNING that.

so can we please stop pretending that these are entirely normal and necessary costs? They may be entirely normal and necessary for someone earning £175k a year and wanting to live in a big house in a nice bit of London, and wanting to work lots of hours, and wanting multiple children under a certain age close together, and wanting to still have more than £1k “leftover” each month after all costs are paid for.

but then it becomes entirely lifestyle choices, doesn’t it?

so the question is either silly, or disingenuous. Or both.

Edited

This

Exactly this ^

And no, I'm not envious. I've lived in London, didn't enjoy it. Had the (relatively) high paid corporate job, chose to leave, chose to have one child because of costs and time

It's about choice

Whining about it after the choice is made , is simply silly and disingenuous

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread