Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that those private school parents banging on about their fees

1000 replies

Thegreatergoodgerald · 23/05/2024 11:23

Seriously have misjudged how little anyone else gives a stuff??? NHS, social care, state education, public transport, bloody potholes everywhere - that’s what matters to everyone I know.
Not whether or not VAT is added to a business.

YANBU - it’s hardly the end of the world if Clemmie or Charles end up going to a state school. We have bigger things to worry about in the U.K. right now

YABU - of course everyone cares private school parents might have to pay more

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
norfolkbroadd · 23/05/2024 20:07

@NeverDropYourMooncup Is correct, birth rates are falling and where I live - a vibrant town in SE popular with families, our DD's school's Year R and Year 1 classes are all short by approx five students. We moved our DD v early in year R and were delighted/relieved that the school we moved her too had not just one place, but 6. This is a school that is historically oversubscribed.

norfolkbroadd · 23/05/2024 20:09

I'm the squeezed middle @OhCrumbsWhereNow - although my children attend state schools. I can't lose sleep over privileged people losing privileges when they have been propping up a system that disadvantages every child that goes to state school. Private schools are not charities. So yeah, tiny violins.

coupdetonnerre · 23/05/2024 20:09

shockeditellyou · 23/05/2024 18:08

When a private school round here closed, the other private schools gleefully mopped up the pupils from the closed school - and made the effort to add in buildings to accommodate them. Net impact on state was small.

A couple of schools have closed around here too - same happened. I doubt this will be the same once VAT is introduced. Most families I know have 2 children so it's a huge bill.

Goldenbear · 23/05/2024 20:09

Lilmaubetden · 23/05/2024 19:58

“But students do develop a sense of self preservation”

Some do. And I tell you this as a teacher of 25 years, who has worked in a deprived state school my whole career. For many, school is simply just hellish.

As a female staff member, I have been punched in the face, punched in the back. Shoved and called every name under the sun. I am used to it now, yes, but I long for the day I can afford to get out. That is how many children spend their 5 years in school, longing to get out.

Yes but almost all state school children will have no option so it is not at all satisfactory to argue that private school is the answer. Equally, never seeing that behaviour in a school context makes you wrongly believe everyone in the world is reasonable and if they are not there will be applied consequences that solve the problem for you. Discovering in adult life that this is not the case at all makes those teenagers quite vulnerable.

Whoswhoof · 23/05/2024 20:10

YABVU. Just because it doesn’t affect you and your kids doesn’t mean you shouldn’t give a fuck about anyone elses. It’s wrong on all levels. I cannot stand labour for the first time in my life, not solely for this reason.

Shinyandnew1 · 23/05/2024 20:12

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 23/05/2024 20:03

So please do tell me - and thousand of other parents of ADHD children where we can get ADHD meds prescribed if not via a psychiatrist. In my area it is the only route.

My siblings' children in different counties have the same situation.

It’s always prescribed by the paediatric team who diagnosed them in the first place here. Then, when the dose is established, it can be overseen by the GP if they are happy to do so. None of the many pupils I know with ADHD have seen a psychiatrist.

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 23/05/2024 20:12

norfolkbroadd · 23/05/2024 20:09

I'm the squeezed middle @OhCrumbsWhereNow - although my children attend state schools. I can't lose sleep over privileged people losing privileges when they have been propping up a system that disadvantages every child that goes to state school. Private schools are not charities. So yeah, tiny violins.

Well quite a lot are exactly that - charities...

Can't say that I feel that my state-educated child has been disadvantaged in any way by the existence of private schools.

In fact their very existence means DD can now play the 'state educated' card for the rest of her life.

IBelieveInFerries · 23/05/2024 20:13

I work bloody hard as does my DH. We also have an adopted child who struggles in mainstream education.

My DC would benefit from smaller class sizes and a quieter environment but private school is totally out of our reach. We don't have takeaways and holidays as it is, it wouldn't be a matter of cutting back to make it affordable.

For every one child with SEN in private education, there is a much greater cohort of kids with SEN struggling in mainstream.

They are all just kids and they all deserve an education that can meet their needs. Not just the ones that have parents who can afford it.

Whoswhoof · 23/05/2024 20:13

Oh also, my daughter has been attacked twice in her state pre school by feral, dragged up children who’s parents can barely scrape their arses off the sofa to get them to school never mind actually parent them. I guarantee this won’t happen in her private school commencing in September.

yes I’m aware this isn’t all state school children and I do not mean to tar anybody with the same brush. But the general difference in upbringings in private and state is ALARMING. It’s genuinely a safety concern at this point. As mentioned upthread about a teacher of 25 years.

Tospyornottospy · 23/05/2024 20:14

Willyoujustbequiet · 23/05/2024 19:40

I meant a wider impact across the board/state schools. Obviously it may affect a few individuals currently paying fees but not that many if the polls/research are to be believed. The vast majority are not intending to withdraw their children should this come in. That's because they know they can afford it.

If a family can afford to pay fees for 3 children then they are clearly wealthy. I would struggle to have any sympathy for them being asked to contribute a bit more given their obvious privilege.

No, this is wrong.

if someone is sacrificing to send 3
Children then no, they can’t just cough up another 10k a year. They simply don’t have it.

it’s not hard to understand!

it’s so depressing, politics of dragging people down instead of lifting people up. Why aren’t the govt giving a shit about fixing the dreadful behaviour in state schools? Why not focus on that? Making state schools better, rather than some misguided Robin Hood robbing from the perceived rich (because the actually rich won’t be affected at all) to give to the poor. Why not fucking help the poor, govt?! Why not address why the state schools are failing?!

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 23/05/2024 20:15

Shinyandnew1 · 23/05/2024 20:12

It’s always prescribed by the paediatric team who diagnosed them in the first place here. Then, when the dose is established, it can be overseen by the GP if they are happy to do so. None of the many pupils I know with ADHD have seen a psychiatrist.

Here the GP will only take over prescribing if you see the psychiatrist every 6 months. And any increases or changes have to be done via them so it may be more often than 6 monthly if there are issues.

I can't think of anyone in my extended family or friends with ADHD children who doesn't have their meds done that way.

Is there perhaps a psychiatrist on the paediatric team?

Whoswhoof · 23/05/2024 20:15

Tospyornottospy · 23/05/2024 20:14

No, this is wrong.

if someone is sacrificing to send 3
Children then no, they can’t just cough up another 10k a year. They simply don’t have it.

it’s not hard to understand!

it’s so depressing, politics of dragging people down instead of lifting people up. Why aren’t the govt giving a shit about fixing the dreadful behaviour in state schools? Why not focus on that? Making state schools better, rather than some misguided Robin Hood robbing from the perceived rich (because the actually rich won’t be affected at all) to give to the poor. Why not fucking help the poor, govt?! Why not address why the state schools are failing?!

Perfectly put.

Willyoujustbequiet · 23/05/2024 20:16

Goldenbear · 23/05/2024 19:42

Dealing with all sorts of people is a life skill, the behaviour segregation doesn’t teach private schools kids how to handle unpredictable people.

Exactly

But it's also sweeping statements like this that are quite frankly ignorant. Clearly there may be difficulties in certain areas but exclusions are running at 0.04. It's hardly bedlam.

tennistimetomorrow · 23/05/2024 20:16

It's so subjective but I struggle with everyone banging on about how their 1.5k mortgage has gone up to 2.5k now. Should have bought a smaller house and not done that kitchen renovation. (Is what I want to say)

That's a really tricky situation for your family ! (Is what I actually say)

twistyizzy · 23/05/2024 20:17

BIossomtoes · 23/05/2024 20:06

That’s Fenland which is one specific area of Cambridgeshire. There are plenty in nearby Peterborough and the rest of the county. There are no private schools in Fenland either.

Fair enough however FOI is revealing more areas across the country where LAs are saying they have no spaces eg Glamorgan, Leeds are the 2 newest.

sheoaouhra · 23/05/2024 20:17

Charlie2121 · 23/05/2024 20:03

The whole issue with the proposal is that there are literally no winners so what’s the point of doing it?

Some private school parents have to move their children against their will.

Parents who no longer use PS will reduce earnings and pay less tax

Taxpayers have to fund additional state school places

Increased competition for grammars and the best state schools

Removal of bursaries for lower income families

Likely net cost to tax payer due to additional state pupils + ex PS parents paying less tax

Where are the winners? There are literally none. It takes an almost impossibly incompetent government to suggest the introduction of a policy which benefits not a single person.

It will benefit state schools by increasing the pool of applicants for jobs - currently we have zero applicants for some vacancies!

Beansticks · 23/05/2024 20:18

Tospyornottospy · 23/05/2024 20:14

No, this is wrong.

if someone is sacrificing to send 3
Children then no, they can’t just cough up another 10k a year. They simply don’t have it.

it’s not hard to understand!

it’s so depressing, politics of dragging people down instead of lifting people up. Why aren’t the govt giving a shit about fixing the dreadful behaviour in state schools? Why not focus on that? Making state schools better, rather than some misguided Robin Hood robbing from the perceived rich (because the actually rich won’t be affected at all) to give to the poor. Why not fucking help the poor, govt?! Why not address why the state schools are failing?!

Schools aren’t failing. Children are under huge pressures( SM, screen addiction, col, broken mental health support, dire curriculum the Tories introduced , SEN underfunding….)which the Tories have done zilch about.

Labours idea of a MH professional in every school is a good start.

CaravaggiosCat · 23/05/2024 20:19

Spirallingdownwards · 23/05/2024 11:28

Well I guess there may be a whole raft of people who may be worried that Clemmie and Charles will now be taking their kids secondary place at the nice school they want their Olivia and Oliver to go to and now they will have to the less nice school. They may also worry that the local break even small indies will close and all those students will need to be placed elsewhere and the local authority will have no option but to find them places potentially meaning their kids will be in classes of over 40. So whilst yes some can take the hit of the VAT some can't and some schools won't be sustainable and will close and impact other state schools.

But if you were that annoyed by the issue you may have already read all this on the other 70 or so threads there have been about it.

Omg this. The house prices will go up even more in good catchments. That little extra that isn't going on private school will go on the houses next to the good schools pushing others into the less desirable schools and areas. It's not rocket science.

Ohpleeeease · 23/05/2024 20:19

MinervaMcGonagallsCat · 23/05/2024 11:41

bursaries and offering free access to facilities for local state schools will be stopped by a number of private schools

These are scaremongering tactics

Bursaries are either fundraised for by private schools with donations from current parents, former parents and former pupils - can't see that stopping. Or they are funded by endowments or trusts - that certainly wont stop. (And also counts towards their charitable status see below)

As for free access to facilities for local state schools - that is a legal requirement for charitable status. Not a chance in hell schools will give that up voluntarily because the tax implications go far beyond VAT.

Free access to facilities for local state schools is not a legal requirement for charitable status.

Charities, including schools, have to demonstrate public benefit. They have very wide discretion on how they go about doing that.

whistleblower99 · 23/05/2024 20:19

You’ll give a stuff if they take their taxes and work abilities elsewhere. The taxes that pay for your welfare state.

Razorwire · 23/05/2024 20:20

It’s just a ploy to get votes.
I’m doubtful “they” will actually start charging VAT. There’s a lot to un-wind with charitable status & if they do the result just might be private education gets more elite and state more overburdened and not preparing UK youth for success. Economy tanks long term.
Also
Finding it small-minded that people think only Tory’s have money enough for private school.

So anyone not Tory is poor and doesn’t value education??

Lenoftheglen · 23/05/2024 20:21

Gruffallowhydidntyouknow · 23/05/2024 19:54

The great irony here is that Labour love to penalise the "rich" to give to the "poor" However, it won't be the rich that are affected. It will be the potentially socially mobile, parents who can just about afford independent school with sacrifices that will struggle. Not the Benedicts of the world but those whose parents tried to do something to support their child.

My brother and his husband have adopted twin boys that had a hard start in life. They have their boys in a small private school as the quieter calmer atmosphere, structure and sports, as well as the smaller classes is perfect for them. They won't be able to cope with 20% fee increase twice over as they aren't landed gentry, just a couple of Dads that put every spare penny into their children's school fees.

Edited

They won't be able to cope with 20% fee increase twice over as they aren't landed gentry, just a couple of Dads that put every spare penny into their children's school fees.

And many families who aren't the landed gentry and who put every spare penny into staying afloat....

Your point is lost because you don't have one.

Beansticks · 23/05/2024 20:21

whistleblower99 · 23/05/2024 20:19

You’ll give a stuff if they take their taxes and work abilities elsewhere. The taxes that pay for your welfare state.

But they won’t because the vast majority of fee paying parents are either parents of foreign students or well able to pay a bit of VAT.

morechocolateneededtoday · 23/05/2024 20:21

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 23/05/2024 20:15

Here the GP will only take over prescribing if you see the psychiatrist every 6 months. And any increases or changes have to be done via them so it may be more often than 6 monthly if there are issues.

I can't think of anyone in my extended family or friends with ADHD children who doesn't have their meds done that way.

Is there perhaps a psychiatrist on the paediatric team?

Edited

GPs generally only take over prescribing under shared care agreements - this means they will prescribe but the person is seen by a specialist at fixed periods of time to review and adjust medication (usually 6 months but can vary).

In the case of paediatrics, the specialist can be a psychiatrist or a paediatrician and, more recently, non-medical prescribers such as pharmacists and nurses are also specialising in the field. Each shared care document will stipulate who the GP will take on the prescribing from and the majority of GPs will also only accept a NHS specialist.

Willyoujustbequiet · 23/05/2024 20:22

Tospyornottospy · 23/05/2024 20:14

No, this is wrong.

if someone is sacrificing to send 3
Children then no, they can’t just cough up another 10k a year. They simply don’t have it.

it’s not hard to understand!

it’s so depressing, politics of dragging people down instead of lifting people up. Why aren’t the govt giving a shit about fixing the dreadful behaviour in state schools? Why not focus on that? Making state schools better, rather than some misguided Robin Hood robbing from the perceived rich (because the actually rich won’t be affected at all) to give to the poor. Why not fucking help the poor, govt?! Why not address why the state schools are failing?!

I just feel that you really have to be so far removed from the reality of life for the majority of the country to not understand the level of privilege to be able to send 3 children to private school.

It's more than most households have to live on.

The disconnect is very real.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.