Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there needs to be a public inquiry into child development

592 replies

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 19/05/2024 11:53

It really seems like we have a looming societal crisis in terms of child development and therefore the quality of the public in 10-20 years time. Experienced teachers across the board seem to be reporting an overwhelming increase in delayed, aggressive and disruptive children. I’m extremely worried about how this will impact society when they become adults - it seems (as a guess) at least a tenth of children will be incapable of work of any kind, and many more will need copious amounts of support to live any kind of responsible life.

AIBU to think we need an urgent public inquiry into this and what is going on? It seems to be the elephant in the room and anybody who tries to discuss it is shouted down.

I’m sure some of it is due to cuts in services but surely that can’t account for it all - it’s very sudden and extremely alarming.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
RhubarbCurd · 20/05/2024 15:09

Most women now drink some alcohol.

We aren't being given the public health warnings that ANY alcohol after CONCEPTION can damage the embryo.

I thought drinking rates had fallen in the younger generations - I see media and surveys and https://alcoholchange.org.uk/alcohol-facts/fact-sheets/drinking-trends-in-the-uk saying this - and DH in HE says it's noticeable in his students more don't drink at all and one that do drink less.

Also my youngest is 15 and I absolutely were told no alcohol at all in pg- as were mothers with younger kids than mine - though I concede that may be area dependent.

Drinking trends in the UK | Alcohol Change UK

Drinking trends in the UK change all the time. They also vary by age, gender, and where people live.

https://alcoholchange.org.uk/alcohol-facts/fact-sheets/drinking-trends-in-the-uk

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 15:27

RhubarbCurd · 20/05/2024 13:21

I think a lot of the reasons that ND people can't work are man-made though, and could be fixed.

This - certainly with schools.

I think my kids are very similar to me - ND - wise but I had much calmer less chaotic school environments to content with - my secondary could get loud and noisy and chaotic but lessons were clam and gave that break so could cope with rest of the day.

DD2 not getting that - huge classes, inexperienced teachers poor behavior and lots of supply - it's chaotic and loud the bulk of the time - toilet access is so restricted as to not be there - lunch was stressful time some senior more experienced teachers stared breaking rules and letting kids like mine eat quietly in their classroom. DD2 started to think she's the problem not the environment an attitude that's seems to get encouraged with emphasis on what she can't do - which we as parents that have to battle against.

This is exactly what I am seeing too. Secondary schools used to be quiet academic places that were great for ND kids.

Now they're all videos and excitement and roll playing and it drives my ND kid crazy.

ExcitedButNervous0424 · 20/05/2024 15:50

I also don’t think it helps that some men seem to not care anymore about the implications of walking away from their family home and their children.

I think there are higher numbers of children being bought up with crap fathers (or completely absent ones) and some of these children will have no consistent positive male role model in their life either.

I think both parents play a very important role in the individual growth of a child (emotionally and socially) and when one of them barely shows an interest in their child (99.9% of the time it’s the father) then that has to have some impact on their self worth, their confidence and in turn their behaviours.

The same goes for children who are raised in the homes of unhappy marriages and dysfunctional relationships. It all has an impact.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 16:12

luckylms · 20/05/2024 14:34

Lots of countries have more freedoms for their children and have diff ways of life but the actual stays on SEN especially asd is that it has increased everywhere and we are no where near the top statistically when factoring only children.

To be honest I haven’t looked into a rise in other countries, just the U.K. although I have heard anecdotally the States is reporting the same.

OP posts:
MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 16:14

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 15:27

This is exactly what I am seeing too. Secondary schools used to be quiet academic places that were great for ND kids.

Now they're all videos and excitement and roll playing and it drives my ND kid crazy.

I can see how kids who are sensitive to noise/chaos are probably living in hell in 2024. I’m not ND and am pretty sociable but even I don’t like blasting dance music in supermarkets. Everything seems designed to heighten emotions now rather than let the brain have peace and time to process

OP posts:
Lilyhatesjaz · 20/05/2024 16:25

I think there is an increase in children with quite complex additional needs in main stream schools who would have previously gone to specialist schools this lets down these children as they often get insufficient support, but also lets down the other children whose education is often disrupted.
I used to work in early years, when I started in the early 2000s we played and talked to the children did crafts and organised games. By the time I left we had so much paper work and observations to do the actual interaction with the children was suffering.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 16:26

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 13:37

Not even in the 80s was this very common for new DC.

That's why it's ridiculous when people say 'well in the past, those DC would have been hidden away'.

In the late 19th and early to mid 20th century, DC with what we would now consider to be LD or high-needs ASC kids would routinely be offered placements in institutions but also, some families said no and kept their kids at home.

1980s - 90s was the slow dismantle of the institutions and asylums.

So 'these kids' that would allegedly have been hidden away, haven't been for at least 30 years, I agree.

So entirely irrelevant when we're taking about now.

I agree. I knew disabled children growing up, they were at home (early to late 90s). Among the conditions were Downs (there seemed to be more presumably due to more primitive testing), cerebral palsy and cystic fibrosis.

What there seemed to be less of (happy to stand corrected at least anecdotally!) is children simply failing to develop as expected for no discernible reason.

I think we’ve slowly become used to seeing children lagging to the extent we don’t really recognise it any more. I was chatting to a lady at work who is back from maternity, her child is 18 months now and cannot walk and has no proper words. She didn’t seem to think this was anything out of the ordinary, and it probably isn’t and her child will likely catch up, but it is unusual and this is the stage where some input from a HV or similar should happen.

DS is 14 months and had his check at 9 months which I thought was far too early given the crucial communication window is around 11-15 months. A 15 month review would be much better in catching the children who are lagging a bit, it seems to me anyway.

OP posts:
luckylms · 20/05/2024 16:39

Lilyhatesjaz · 20/05/2024 16:25

I think there is an increase in children with quite complex additional needs in main stream schools who would have previously gone to specialist schools this lets down these children as they often get insufficient support, but also lets down the other children whose education is often disrupted.
I used to work in early years, when I started in the early 2000s we played and talked to the children did crafts and organised games. By the time I left we had so much paper work and observations to do the actual interaction with the children was suffering.

You are correct my DC is medically complex including more than one tube and machines, ASD, CP, speech delay
was placed in a mainstream primary and now going to be forced in to a main stream secondary.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 16:45

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 16:14

I can see how kids who are sensitive to noise/chaos are probably living in hell in 2024. I’m not ND and am pretty sociable but even I don’t like blasting dance music in supermarkets. Everything seems designed to heighten emotions now rather than let the brain have peace and time to process

This is exactly the problem. We can't move for videos and gifs and images and things that are intended to shock. Even if you look at the home page of the BBC iplayer, it's full of really quite shocking stuff. The days where you could rely on the BBC to produce "Open all hours" and "Wogan" are long gone.

In the old days a pop concert saw people holding up candles at the very most and now the pop concerts have crazy bright lighting.

In our house we've had to go back to the 80s way of living to dial my DC back to a normal state and it's working remarkably well.

Screens are out here now, except for bake-off type stuff. We're using books and playing the piano and going for walks and it is so much better, But when I tell schools this they say "cannot meet need".

They just can't accommodate kids who can't be constantly babysat by screens in school.

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 16:51

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 13:06

I think a lot of the reasons that ND people can't work are man-made though, and could be fixed.

I can't work because I get headaches from LED lights and nausea from the constantly moving pictures on screens in the screen-based world we live in now.

If I had fluorescent lights and fluorescent backlit screens or paper to work from I'd do just fine,

The tv is full of fear and horror and intense music too, and it didn't used to be like that.

Everywhere is full of bright lights and intense stuff these days and none of it is necessary. If we could get rid of this stuff and make the world calmer and less full of sensory overwhelm then ND would be able to work again.

I think there are likely very many jobs that wouldn't involve LED lights or screens, that would be fine for you though?

That doesn't mean you 'can't work', just that you can't work in certain roles.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 16:54

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 16:51

I think there are likely very many jobs that wouldn't involve LED lights or screens, that would be fine for you though?

That doesn't mean you 'can't work', just that you can't work in certain roles.

I can't go into buildings though, because they are all lit by LED lights. That is quite limiting.

If the world would create a wfh role where I literally never need to go to any other building I would like that a lot.

I'm a SAHM at the moment btw, so not actually looking for work or claming benefits.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 16:58

Could we invite the Labour shadow education secretary on to discuss this with us? I think it would be good to do that.

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 17:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 17:00

Or we could write a letter to the British Medical Journal, signed "from the Mumsnetters". I would be willing to write and send it. I'm a biomedical research scientist.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 17:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm not claiming benefits and never have.

SprinkleofSpringShowers · 20/05/2024 17:01

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 16:54

I can't go into buildings though, because they are all lit by LED lights. That is quite limiting.

If the world would create a wfh role where I literally never need to go to any other building I would like that a lot.

I'm a SAHM at the moment btw, so not actually looking for work or claming benefits.

Edited

There’s loads of WFH roles now.

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 17:03

Okay it's fine, you can forget this discussion. I'm not currently looking for a job and have never claimed benefits.

You can relax. Get back to the OP's question.

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 17:16

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 17:03

Okay it's fine, you can forget this discussion. I'm not currently looking for a job and have never claimed benefits.

You can relax. Get back to the OP's question.

But you 'can't work' so have possibly never contributed as a tax-payer and you're currently saying you couldn't work because of LED lights and screens giving you a headache and nausea.

You might not be claiming benefits now but you are certainly benefitting from the 'system' as a SAHM. Your prenatal, maternity and postnatal care. Your
GP. Your DC future education..

I don't need to 'relax' .

How do you think all the public services you're using are funded?

If you didn't realise, it's from people working and paying tax.

Even if they don't like LED lights..

SpudleyLass · 20/05/2024 17:23

FastAquaDog · 20/05/2024 17:16

But you 'can't work' so have possibly never contributed as a tax-payer and you're currently saying you couldn't work because of LED lights and screens giving you a headache and nausea.

You might not be claiming benefits now but you are certainly benefitting from the 'system' as a SAHM. Your prenatal, maternity and postnatal care. Your
GP. Your DC future education..

I don't need to 'relax' .

How do you think all the public services you're using are funded?

If you didn't realise, it's from people working and paying tax.

Even if they don't like LED lights..

Everybody benefits from " the system". Disability or no.

SprinkleofSpringShowers · 20/05/2024 18:36

NotReallyOnFire · 20/05/2024 16:58

Could we invite the Labour shadow education secretary on to discuss this with us? I think it would be good to do that.

Sounds like a brilliant idea.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 18:43

SprinkleofSpringShowers · 20/05/2024 18:36

Sounds like a brilliant idea.

I would be all for it.

OP posts:
badwolf82 · 20/05/2024 18:53

Windthebloodybobbinup · 19/05/2024 16:52

There is a lack of studies but recent stats indicate approx 17% of the population are impacted, with the below life long issues.

This is so infuriating because there is so much bad messaging out there about drinking during pregnancy. The message now seems to be that a small amount of alcohol is just fine, and there doesn’t really seem to be enough evidence to support this (lack of evidence of harm is not the same as evidence of no harm). And honestly if someone can’t control themselves for 9 months and say no to alcohol, what can you hope for in terms of teaching their child boundaries and self control?

SpudleyLass · 20/05/2024 18:55

There is no reason to believe FASD is the issue.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 18:56

If it’s FASD though why the rise? I think the alcohol message now is stronger than the 70s and 80s.

OP posts:
badwolf82 · 20/05/2024 19:02

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 20/05/2024 18:56

If it’s FASD though why the rise? I think the alcohol message now is stronger than the 70s and 80s.

It absolutely isn’t. There are endless posts on here about how it’s okay to have some wine or champagne or whatever when pregnant. It’s seen as very unfashionable to abstain. People were constantly telling me it was okay to have a small drink when pregnant and I was absolutely not having it. There are fashionable pregnancy books that say it’s fine. I think this is especially the case among more educated/wealthy women who would have abstained in previous generations.