Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

State school charging for basics.

172 replies

Purplegarland · 16/05/2024 14:14

Another email from primary school today saying that they are not unable to subsidise school trips at all and will be fundraising/passing costs onto parents. This means that I am required to give even more money.
This month alone they have asked for almost £100 for various things. Including costs for transport, stationary, being a member of school sport teams (kit, transport, pitch/pool fees, and lunch) some of which happen in school time, and a themed day. Of course, I know that trips are optional but I don't see how I could have my child sitting out of a themed day where visitors come in to give a special talk tied into the curriculum. Add in the various charity days and requests for money for wearing blue or whatever and I am paying an absolute fortune on top of any extra curriculars my DC want to do.
Am I being unreasonable that a state school should not be passing so many costs onto parents? Think £40 for a coach on top of day trip fees.

OP posts:
user1497787065 · 16/05/2024 15:25

I'm almost 60 and remember my parents paying for school trips. I don't think this is anything new.

EarthlyNightshade · 16/05/2024 15:30

My DC school always charged for these things, apart from being a member of a school team.
The dress up days were always a pain, but a basic toga/sheet thing with a few enhancements covered nearly everything.

Goldenbear · 16/05/2024 15:30

IFollowRivers · 16/05/2024 15:04

My DC's school (secondary) is having to make teacher redundancies and cut subjects because the amount the government pays is not enough to cover the salaries that the staff are entitled to. There is no spare money

I am happy to pay for trips if that means my DC get to experience enrichment opportunities. PP students are subsidised and the PTA work hard to support cases of hardship but parents who can pay should. The alternative is no trips.

There (really) is no spare money.

At secondary we have a payment system that is itemised bill style so payment for canteen goes on there to. One they have recently is Food technology funding but we also have to pay for The ingredients to take in so I think this is just if you can contribute to help those who can’t really, you don’t have to pay it though.

Purplebunnie · 16/05/2024 15:38

Out of the loop with schooling, Do schools still run a school fair/fete?

My secondary school held one every year and eventually raised enough to buy their own mini-bus (late 60s)

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 15:42

wellington77 · 16/05/2024 14:28

School trips have always been something parents pay for and children’s own stationary and their own PE kit. If your low income (pupil premium) you can get it subsidised

I don't think it is the norm to pay for stationery at Primary school. Also the OP is talking about a team kit not normal PE kit.

And no, you can't always get these things subsidised if your DC gets PP. My DD's did not use it for those things.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 15:51

OmuraWhale · 16/05/2024 14:41

Parents have always paid for school trips and "enrichment" type activities haven't they? I thought the school only subsidised the pupil premium kids.

Many schools don't subsidise the pupil premium kids. My DD's Primary told me government guidance changed and was that it could not be used for enrichment and could only be used for core curriculum things.

Bushmillsbabe · 16/05/2024 15:59

crumblingschools · 16/05/2024 14:51

Many Pupil premium funds are spent on TAs, only way schools can afford to have TAs

This is very true.
Recently a parent asked why the year 6 residential was over £600 for 4 days. The schools answer was that the parents of children not on PP had to cover the costs of those on PP. Some couldn't afford it, but could have afforded the £400 it actually cost for their child. So those who are just above the PP threshold missed out, whilst others went for free.
Not that I want those on PP to miss out, but those just above it shouldn't miss out so others can go.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 16:03

MagnetCarHair · 16/05/2024 14:59

Are you saying that trips aren't being subsidised for kids on fsm's any more?

Not at my DD's school and according to them no schools should be doing this anymore.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 16:03

Samlewis96 · 16/05/2024 15:03

If you are low income AND on benefits maybe If you are £10 a month over benefit levels then no. Expected to keep coughing up

No, not even low income and benefits.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 16:06

Bushmillsbabe · 16/05/2024 15:59

This is very true.
Recently a parent asked why the year 6 residential was over £600 for 4 days. The schools answer was that the parents of children not on PP had to cover the costs of those on PP. Some couldn't afford it, but could have afforded the £400 it actually cost for their child. So those who are just above the PP threshold missed out, whilst others went for free.
Not that I want those on PP to miss out, but those just above it shouldn't miss out so others can go.

That's because PP can't be used for trips. Not that I think that others should have to subsidise unless voluntarily. My DD's Y6 residential was £475 for all parents, PP or not.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 16:09

budgiegirl · 16/05/2024 15:21

Weren't school trips, experiences, swimming lessons etc always charged to the parents (except those on low income)? They were even when I was at school back in the dark ages, and they were when my kids were at primary 15 years ago.

There is an increasing demand for extras that you would think the school should pay for, such as basics including stationery, but that's because schools are woefully underfunded (thank you Tories). And even for simple trips out that need a coach, the prices has increased massively. We take a scout group out once a year on a coach, and the cost has more than doubled since covid, and entrance fees to attractions/events have shot up. Schools just don't have the budget to cover that.

I guess the alternative is more fundraising by the PTA, but funds raised this way are increasingly spent on the basics/essentials, whereas before they were spent on the 'nice to haves'. Plus fundraising seems to be more difficult these days, so many parents just don't want to get involved the way they used to.

At my DD's Primary we were very fortunate that we didn't have to pay for swimming lessons.

OhmygodDont · 16/05/2024 16:10

Apart from pens and pencils in primary that is all of that’s always been expected. Trips, team kits and educational experiences even in school.

DrJonesIpresume · 16/05/2024 16:10

I despair of this government, I really do.

Charlie2121 · 16/05/2024 16:10

StoneAgeRed · 16/05/2024 14:38

Unfortunately this means that children may have no access whatsoever to theatre, galleries, museums, sporty days out etc. I have been a teacher, a school governor, and am now a provider of themed days. A coach costs a blooming fortune. The school isn't your enemy here, they're trying to provide a well rounded experience for the children, many of whom don't get one from their parents. Don't get me wrong, I know this is extremely difficult for tight family budgets, but the real issue is the Tories who give charitable status to private schools and cut state schools to the bone. The teachers know your children deserve more, and they try to provide it. The government really don't care

Complete ill-informed drivel.

crumblingschools · 16/05/2024 16:10

Your school should have a schedule on their website detailing what the pupil premium is being spent on.

Mama2many73 · 16/05/2024 16:11

NImumconfused · 16/05/2024 14:37

Unfortunately for many schools now their budget barely covers staff salaries. We had one local school recently that had to fund raise to pay their electricity - there is absolute nothing available for trips, sports equipment etc.

Totally agree this puts an unfair burden on low income families to find money or have their kids left out, but the school has very few other options. Lobby your MP for more education funding maybe?

And the government have just announced that they may not be able to fully fund the promised pay rise money, backtracking again, so that may need to come out of totally depleted school budgets making it even worse.

OhmygodDont · 16/05/2024 16:11

Bushmillsbabe · 16/05/2024 15:59

This is very true.
Recently a parent asked why the year 6 residential was over £600 for 4 days. The schools answer was that the parents of children not on PP had to cover the costs of those on PP. Some couldn't afford it, but could have afforded the £400 it actually cost for their child. So those who are just above the PP threshold missed out, whilst others went for free.
Not that I want those on PP to miss out, but those just above it shouldn't miss out so others can go.

That’s very bloody annoying as that extra £200 could be the difference between that own child going or not to start with yet it’s paying for someone else’s space.

Squirtleye · 16/05/2024 16:11

My youngest has had one trip in 4 years!

And likely will have 0 swim lessons too.

Eldest at secondary has one trip (subject) and activities.

Riversideandrelax · 16/05/2024 16:13

Charlie2121 · 16/05/2024 16:10

Complete ill-informed drivel.

Some DC's parents can't or don't take them to the theatre, galleries, even the beach. It's fact that for some school trips are their only experience.

OhmygodDont · 16/05/2024 16:13

Primary’s sadly seem to need a strong pta who set up events and parents who actually feel part of the community to want to help and spend at those events.

Secondary level it’s all bets are off but there’s always at least one trip but it’s more a we have 80 places who wants to come to the theatre in London £50, have 60 spaces who wants to go Belgium for £600, 100’spaves skiiing £1,400, F1 trip £10.

Meadowfinch · 16/05/2024 16:18

School trips, transport, coach to swimming lessons and lunches have always been chargeable. Why did you think differently?

As for stationary, you can provide pens pencils, erasers and a note book for a few pounds. Why do you expect someone else to pay for your child.

Unless you are eligible for FSM, YABU.

outsidethemug · 16/05/2024 16:18

@Charlie2121 "Complete ill-informed drivel"

What makes you say that?

Goldenbear · 16/05/2024 16:19

OhmygodDont · 16/05/2024 16:13

Primary’s sadly seem to need a strong pta who set up events and parents who actually feel part of the community to want to help and spend at those events.

Secondary level it’s all bets are off but there’s always at least one trip but it’s more a we have 80 places who wants to come to the theatre in London £50, have 60 spaces who wants to go Belgium for £600, 100’spaves skiiing £1,400, F1 trip £10.

We had a strong PA at my DC’s Junior school as some of the parents were well connected had things like comedy nights with quite famous comedians that raised quite a bit but it had a bar, another new Head didn’t agree with the Bat and selling alcohol so the nights didn’t raise as much.

Goldenbear · 16/05/2024 16:19

The bar not ‘bat’.

Charlie2121 · 16/05/2024 16:21

outsidethemug · 16/05/2024 16:18

@Charlie2121 "Complete ill-informed drivel"

What makes you say that?

The bit about private schools. Without them the state sector would collapse.