Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Auriol Grey's manslaughter sentence overturned for killing cyclist. Correct decision?

1000 replies

Locutus2000 · 08/05/2024 14:17

Reported in multiple outlets - BBC.

Mixed feelings - it was a complex case with no winners on any side.

Auriol Grey

Pedestrian Auriol Grey has Huntingdon cyclist death conviction overturned

A woman whose actions led to the death of a pensioner cycling on a pavement wins a court appeal.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-68975335

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
MetalFences · 08/05/2024 19:59

notedbiscuits · 08/05/2024 19:49

She shouldn’t be charged for this. If she didn’t have her disabilities- would she be jailed? Probably not.

Yes, middle aged white women are notoriously targeted by the CPS. I'm sure if a great big nineteen year old black man had shouted at a woman in her seventies riding a bike and had gesticulated at her whilst shouting then the police wouldn't have even bothered to question him.

TizerorFizz · 08/05/2024 19:59

When the outcome is death, they can look to see if a crime has been committed. In this case, they cannot prove the manslaughter charge.

girlfriend44 · 08/05/2024 20:01

Plenty of cyclists have injured and killed people because they are on the path.
Nine times out of ten they are abusive and couldn't care less.
Don't see a problem with her shouting at the cyclist.
She was probably fed up of feeling she couldn't walk on the path in safety.
Of course the police don't help, they should be out there fining people who cycle on the path and/or confiscating their bikes.
There isn't much deterrent for people not to do it. They know police won't do anything and they carry on.

bakebeans · 08/05/2024 20:01

Yep correct decision. I can’t believe she was ever convicted. Sad for the family but when reading all the facts of the case she was certainly let down by the system

tsmainsqueeze · 08/05/2024 20:02

Either pushed or not pushed , i am thinking of how shocked and scared that poor lady felt in her final moments, the initial verbal abuse then falling from her bike to be hit by a car , what an horrific awful death.
My sympathy is for Mrs Ward and her family.

XenoBitch · 08/05/2024 20:02

infor · 08/05/2024 19:55

Those in the criminal justice system who seemed motivated to serve the bereaved family when faced with an unsympathetic defendant failed all parties.
Auriol Grey will now be entitled to compensation, while the memory of Celia Ward and the mental health of the poor driver will suffer whenever this story resurfaces - which it will with each similar incident.

The driver gets forgotten in all of this.

She is called Carla Money, a mum of two. As a result of AG's actions, her marriage and mental health have gone down the shitter.

"The 33-year-old said: “Not only did you [Ms Grey] knock my confidence but a piece of me was lost.
“A small piece of the Carla everyone knew went that day.
“I no longer have a happy-go-lucky personality. I couldn't face speaking to people.
“Because of your selfish actions my children suffered, they lost their mum."
“Mummy didn't want to be around them or play with them. I struggled to get out of bed and was snappy.
“My relationship has collapsed with my husband so much we are getting divorced. My children aged seven and four now have to deal with separated parents.”

Allfur · 08/05/2024 20:03

girlfriend44 · 08/05/2024 20:01

Plenty of cyclists have injured and killed people because they are on the path.
Nine times out of ten they are abusive and couldn't care less.
Don't see a problem with her shouting at the cyclist.
She was probably fed up of feeling she couldn't walk on the path in safety.
Of course the police don't help, they should be out there fining people who cycle on the path and/or confiscating their bikes.
There isn't much deterrent for people not to do it. They know police won't do anything and they carry on.

'Plenty'? You have statistics for that ?

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 08/05/2024 20:03

MikeRafone · 08/05/2024 19:47

totally agree

but shared paths are a cheap alternative to creating proper cycle paths

Its dangerous for pedestrians and for cyclists - in this case the cyclist died

Many cyclists don't use the paths and prefer to use the pavement where they put in danger the pedestrians.

SabreIsMyFave · 08/05/2024 20:03

CormorantStrikesBack · 08/05/2024 14:47

Wrong decision imho. Firstly it was a shared path and the cyclist had a right to be there. Even if it was a footpath there’s no excuse for acting so aggressively.

She lurched towards the cyclist while waving her arm. Of course the cyclist was going to take avoiding action.

This woman trundled off for food and left her dying in the road.

There was always some disagreement about whether physical contact took place, it’s hard to tell from the cctv iirc but the prosecution felt it had taken place

it’s a poor outcome That woman killed the cyclist and has got away with it.

This. ^ The woman (Auriol Grey,) should not have had her sentence overturned IMO.

She is guilty of manslaughter, and I am actually disgusted that she has had her sentence overturned. Her rude and aggressive actions resulted in a woman's death.

prh47bridge · 08/05/2024 20:04

theilltemperedclavecinist · 08/05/2024 19:29

So this decision has created a bit of an opportunity for cyclist haters then, if it's legal for them to go around deliberately startling them in the hope they might swerve into the path of another vehicle? As long as they don't touch or threaten them. Maybe bursting a balloon or firing a starter pistol?

No, it really hasn't. If you deliberately startle someone in the hope that they might swerve into the path of another vehicle, that is murder.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 08/05/2024 20:04

timenowplease · 08/05/2024 19:47

Reasonable doubt is easy to meet.

Would the cyclist have gone under a car if she hadn't been attached? The answer of course is no.

What do you mean by that? That Reasonable doubt is easy to meet.?

Also, attached to where?

Sorry, your post is very difficult to understand.

MsLuxLisbon · 08/05/2024 20:06

Mistymountain · 08/05/2024 19:35

On the issue of shared paths, they have converted quite a few pavements in our area to shared paths, this means that the cyclists get plenty of room and the pedestrians are pushed into the hedge. During the summer when the hedge grows and isn't trimmed, where are pedestrians supposed to go? I think cyclists should be off the pavements and returned to the roads.

So do I. I find this thread absolutely outrageous.

Allfur · 08/05/2024 20:07

MsLuxLisbon · 08/05/2024 20:06

So do I. I find this thread absolutely outrageous.

It's that outrage that is part of the problem

HonoraBridge · 08/05/2024 20:08

“The cyclist was allowed to be on the pavement. But even if she wasn't, she didn't deserve to be pushed into the path of an oncoming car.
It certainly wasn't an accident”
Flopsybunny - Careful! The cyclist was not “pushed”. It was never suggested that she was pushed and that is not what the video shows. Be careful what you say.

prh47bridge · 08/05/2024 20:10

CormorantStrikesBack · 08/05/2024 18:01

so couldn’t she be guilty of number 2? Isn’t it something like it’s gross negligence if the average person could foresee that the actions (yelling and lunging at the cyclist) could result in what happened?

Gross negligence manslaughter is mainly used for deaths following medical treatment, deaths in the workplace and deaths in custody. Away from those settings, it is pretty much exclusively used where the defendant has known that the victim was clearly in need of emergency medical care and hasn't done anything about it. Yelling and waving your arms might be negligence (although that isn't guaranteed), but it is highly unlikely to be gross negligence.

Gagaandgag · 08/05/2024 20:10

XenoBitch · 08/05/2024 20:02

The driver gets forgotten in all of this.

She is called Carla Money, a mum of two. As a result of AG's actions, her marriage and mental health have gone down the shitter.

"The 33-year-old said: “Not only did you [Ms Grey] knock my confidence but a piece of me was lost.
“A small piece of the Carla everyone knew went that day.
“I no longer have a happy-go-lucky personality. I couldn't face speaking to people.
“Because of your selfish actions my children suffered, they lost their mum."
“Mummy didn't want to be around them or play with them. I struggled to get out of bed and was snappy.
“My relationship has collapsed with my husband so much we are getting divorced. My children aged seven and four now have to deal with separated parents.”

Really feel for Carla

VerasChips · 08/05/2024 20:11

prh47bridge · 08/05/2024 20:10

Gross negligence manslaughter is mainly used for deaths following medical treatment, deaths in the workplace and deaths in custody. Away from those settings, it is pretty much exclusively used where the defendant has known that the victim was clearly in need of emergency medical care and hasn't done anything about it. Yelling and waving your arms might be negligence (although that isn't guaranteed), but it is highly unlikely to be gross negligence.

If shouting and waving your arms were a crime then there really would be a prison over population issue.

HonoraBridge · 08/05/2024 20:12

HuckleberryBlackcurrant · 08/05/2024 14:45

I think it's so disgusting that she left the scene and went shopping. I don't think she's sorry at all. But I think it is the right decision.

Have you read about AG’s health/medical situation? Your comment suggests not.

PassingStranger · 08/05/2024 20:12

Allfur · 08/05/2024 20:03

'Plenty'? You have statistics for that ?

There have been incidents where people have been killed or injured by cyclists.
Many more than cyclists who have fallen into the road after being shouted at.

Stressedafff · 08/05/2024 20:12

Actually disgraceful.

The lives of Celia Ward and Carla Money have been lost and ruined. Their families have been affected by all of this debacle

But that doesn’t matter at all does it.

Butchyrestingface · 08/05/2024 20:12

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 08/05/2024 20:04

What do you mean by that? That Reasonable doubt is easy to meet.?

Also, attached to where?

Sorry, your post is very difficult to understand.

Edited

I think the PP means "attacked".

But, of course, she wasn't attacked.

sandyhappypeople · 08/05/2024 20:13

HonoraBridge · 08/05/2024 20:08

“The cyclist was allowed to be on the pavement. But even if she wasn't, she didn't deserve to be pushed into the path of an oncoming car.
It certainly wasn't an accident”
Flopsybunny - Careful! The cyclist was not “pushed”. It was never suggested that she was pushed and that is not what the video shows. Be careful what you say.

So when asked how she ended up in the road, Auriol Grey saying she made contact with her as she passed her means nothing then?

theilltemperedclavecinist · 08/05/2024 20:13

prh47bridge · 08/05/2024 20:04

No, it really hasn't. If you deliberately startle someone in the hope that they might swerve into the path of another vehicle, that is murder.

Well obviously you wouldn't tell the court that's what you hoped for!

justasking111 · 08/05/2024 20:14

There's a lady like AG near us who has four dogs and hates cyclists she shouts at them, laughs if they wobble or fall off. I wouldn't expect her to get a custodial sentence

PurplePansy05 · 08/05/2024 20:14

I watched the video of this incident multiple times and I can't work out from it whether she touched/hit Celia Ward or not, but I agree that this is a possibility. It is also possible that she was flailing her arms around and Celia swerved to avoid her, then very unfortunately hit the kerb and fell of her bike onto the road. I really can't call it from that video.

To me this is the crux, it's not clear whether any offence was committed. That's regardless of Auriol's disabilities. So legally her convinction was unsafe and that's the appeal judges' decision.

Now, a separate point is that my gut tells me the very final seconds of the video suggest that she did hit or push Celia and that it may have been an assault which led to Celia falling off the bike and dying after being hit by the car. That's my gut and I actually struggle to have any sympathy for Auriol. I feel very sorry for Celia Ward and her family, she was in the wrong place at a wrong time.

But there's not enough evidence and that's that, the gut feelings aren't grounds to convict someone.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread