DLA was never means tested. It was a universal benefit, as is PIP. If you’re assessing the extra cost of disability, where do you draw the line with means testing when all of the claimants have extra costs ? There will always be a cut off point which could mean those with high needs losing out because they’re over the threshold by a couple of pounds.
I think the problem with PIP is that it’s open to people with temporary conditions as well as permanent disability. The condition has to have been present for more than three months and likely to last another nine months to qualify. I think more could be done to expand the thresholds there to exclude relatively minor conditions, and to reiterate that there is a difference between a temporary or mild health condition and a permanent disability
The requirements for mental health conditions are already stringent for PIP. Only secondary consultant led care qualifies and the bar is set very high even for that. Sadly l think what it comes down to is that when the coalition government proudly announced back in 2013, that mental health conditions would now be included in disability benefits for the first time, they didn’t really think it through or properly anticipate the extra costs that would bring.
The fatal flaw with PIP is that it was never designed to properly support disabled people. It was designed to save money and based on the mistaken government thinking at the time, that very many DLA claimants weren’t genuine, and that raising the thresholds for eligibility would weed them out and drastically reduce claims. Instead people were successful on migration from DLA to PIP because they were genuine and many more who failed - mainly because of the deeply flawed assessment process - were successful at tribunal.
Add the cost of tribunals to the unexpectedly high levels of new costs for mental health conditions, and then factor in the high number of claims successful during the pandemic, and you begin to get a handle on things. Namely that PIP really isn’t fit for purpose. The problem is, that left to the Tories that’s the perfect excuse to ignore the real reasons that costs have increased, in favour of once again vilifying claimants and cutting support across the board. And as with every previous round of disability benefit cuts it will be the most severely disabled who will be first in line because they cost the most to support.