Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do you begrudge high earners?

340 replies

cheerscheerscheerstomeyeahcheers · 28/04/2024 08:47

Do you actually understand what they do and why they earn so much?
Would you be actually willing to put in the time and effort yourself?

I see so much griping about people that earn a lot, but I also see a lot of ignorance about why they earn what they do.

OP posts:
Sweetnessandbite · 28/04/2024 10:47

When I read the title my initial belief is that, no, I don't begrudge high earners at all. Then I read your post with do they "actually" and it annoyed me. I don't begrudge high earners but to think that only high earners put a lot of work in, have a lot of stress, or have high skills to earn that wage is nieve. Many people work extremely hard and are ridiculously underpaid. It annoys me when some high earners can't see this.

rrrrrreatt · 28/04/2024 10:48

As others have said, high salaries and working hard are two separate topics. I don’t begrudge anyone anything they’re entitled to but I do begrudge the idea that we live in a meritocracy.

The hardest work I’ve ever done was in takeaways as a teenager to pay my bills and rent and I earnt £3.50 an hour (NMW then for u18s). I now have a middle management office job and it’s more stressful but nowhere near as hard. When I look around me at work, middle class well educated people are massively over-represented (proportionate to general society) esp in the highest paid jobs because education and opportunity breeds better earnings much more than hard work.

Heatedblanky · 28/04/2024 10:48

I know a few men who earn this sort of money (over 300,000 a year, a couple of them are nearer a million a year). I don’t know any women earning that much. I’m caught between admiring these men, envying them and wondering how the hell such a thing is possible as they can often seem uninformed, unimaginative and lacking in empathy. I can only assume their specialist knowledge and skills are enough for them to carry out their roles and their ability to operate at a high level in the real world is not important, but I still find it odd.

Mnetcurious · 28/04/2024 10:49

WoodBurningStov · 28/04/2024 10:37

I think, if you've never been in the position to either be a higher or live with a high earner, you'd probably struggle to understand the time and effort it takes to maintain that wage.

it isn't just a job, it ends up being a lifestyle. Your whole life revolves around work. Families have to fit in, children have to fit in, holidays have to fit in and around work I remember my dh taking his laptop on holiday and working, whilst me and the DC we're sat by the pool. Equally I remember my DD telling me off for using my phone during my youngest Christmas play, as I had to respond to an urgent email.

The time it takes is one thing, but the stress and responsibility is also another part to it. You may not be 'doing the work' but you have overall responsibility for it, and the lives of the people who work for you, so if something goes wrong, your neck is on the chopping board, not to mention people's livelihood, ability to pay mortgages etc are on the line.

This may well be the case for many high earners. It’s definitely not the case for others.

Oblomov24 · 28/04/2024 10:50

Yes and No. Most of course not, I wouldn't want their positions. But I've met a few who I couldn't figure out why: some managers on £80k who are useless.

DrJonesIpresume · 28/04/2024 10:54

cheerscheerscheerstomeyeahcheers · 28/04/2024 08:47

Do you actually understand what they do and why they earn so much?
Would you be actually willing to put in the time and effort yourself?

I see so much griping about people that earn a lot, but I also see a lot of ignorance about why they earn what they do.

I don't begrudge them what they earn.

What I do have trouble with is their sneering, contemptuous attitude towards people who earn less than they do.

Snoopsnoggysnog · 28/04/2024 10:57

WhatWouldYouDo33 · 28/04/2024 08:54

Or privilege or a specific look that was needed in a certain role.
I worked with two people who got into Harvard on legacy spots (meaning they had a parent and/or grandparent at Harvard). That opens a lot of doors for you and they didn’t get in on hard work alone.

I know someone else who went to Eton and was mentored into his very senior role by his godmother who was senior in his industry. Yes he works hard but privilege gave him opportunities.

I had no idea about legacy spots. Reading about this now. This is a daft thread, but this post has taught be something so thank you!

ssd · 28/04/2024 11:02

Has the op came back to enlighten us yet

eurochick · 28/04/2024 11:04

I used to be a high earner, in the top 1% or so. I will happily admit to tax avoiding - I paid into a pension and saved into an isa. Other than that I paid every penny of tax due, over 90k in some years. My job was always stressful and often toxic. I'm now self-employed and there are definitely a lot more ways to play the tax system if I wanted to.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 28/04/2024 11:06

It depends what they do. I know some high earners who admit to me that they don’t do much, but get paid a lot. Usually at a high level in their career and sometimes it’s more for knowledge they’re employed.

Some high earners I know do work hard, bankers eg. But most retire earlier and some it’s affected marriages due to long hours and stress.

DB earns a lot in his job but it’s long hours and often away from home and it’s not really doable with a young family. Or if it is, it’s better when you’re younger, not when you’re his age with a few health issues.

MigGirl · 28/04/2024 11:06

cheerscheerscheerstomeyeahcheers · 28/04/2024 08:52

£300k plus

WHAT, only 1% of people earn over £180k and only 5% earn over 87k.

I would consider 300k to be an extremely high salary and I would expect them to be working very long weeks for this.

But a high salary say 90k I've seen people not actually doing more then those on lower wages, just depends on the sector you work in really rather then how much effort you put into the actual job. Plus often very high earns often have people underneath them who they can delegate work to.

DitzyDoughnutt · 28/04/2024 11:10

Ceramic272 · 28/04/2024 10:46

No I don’t care. It’s obvious that some jobs pay way more for the same hours, and that some people’s families will prepare them way better to go for those jobs than others. It’s also obvious that the people who end up at the top often are even not the smartest/most hardworking/“best” people. that’s just a fact of life - you can’t pretend life is fair in any way.

However, I do wish there had been much more education earlier on at school about different types of jobs, what makes money, and why a typically higher earning job is valuable (or not!). There was very little career education beyond school and anything we were taught was very stereotypical black and white - things like “finance makes money but is only suitable for certain people/personalities (men)” and so on. Most people I know invariably ended up doing what their parents did (or wanted them to do). I have some really brilliant friends who have really struggled salary wise post school/uni as they never had proper guidance or support in terms of the next stage of jobs. I recognise there are a lot of structural inequalities but I think the education system could focus way, way more on helping students understand all their options, do work experience etc.

When I was at school toward the end when we were about to leave a career officer came round with a selection of jobs for us to apply for . He kept offering me factory and shop work. When I asked about office jobs he laughed and said "Oh no dear they are for the Grammar school girls "

DrJonesIpresume · 28/04/2024 11:13

MigGirl · 28/04/2024 11:06

WHAT, only 1% of people earn over £180k and only 5% earn over 87k.

I would consider 300k to be an extremely high salary and I would expect them to be working very long weeks for this.

But a high salary say 90k I've seen people not actually doing more then those on lower wages, just depends on the sector you work in really rather then how much effort you put into the actual job. Plus often very high earns often have people underneath them who they can delegate work to.

A lot of high earners sit round a table all week playing yackety yack, admiring brightly coloured-in reports and discussing strategy, while in the next building, hundreds of skilled employees on not much more than minimum wage are working their fingers to the bone manufacturing the goods.

They forget who, in that situation, the company needs the most.

atotalshambles · 28/04/2024 11:14

I think that the main issue is that 'normal' jobs have become rubbish. The expectations on regular office jobs for unpaid overtime and extra hours and stress alongside the reduction in terms and conditions (final salary pensions etc...). 20 years ago it was possible to buy a house and have a 'normal' job along with a good work-life balance. My friend works for a failing private sector institution and noted that the board members were on hundreds of thousands of pounds while she was paid much less than colleagues at similar institutions. This organisation was also in a huge amount of debt. I have also noticed among my friends and family that a number of the higher earners are now going to live in places like Monaco, Dubai and Singapore. They can pay no income tax and their families can stay in the UK accessing schools and health care etc...Not sure what the answer is - I think if Labour raises taxes then lots of higher earners will leave - it is very easy to transfer to another country of residence if you are a high earner.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 28/04/2024 11:14

WoodBurningStov · 28/04/2024 10:37

I think, if you've never been in the position to either be a higher or live with a high earner, you'd probably struggle to understand the time and effort it takes to maintain that wage.

it isn't just a job, it ends up being a lifestyle. Your whole life revolves around work. Families have to fit in, children have to fit in, holidays have to fit in and around work I remember my dh taking his laptop on holiday and working, whilst me and the DC we're sat by the pool. Equally I remember my DD telling me off for using my phone during my youngest Christmas play, as I had to respond to an urgent email.

The time it takes is one thing, but the stress and responsibility is also another part to it. You may not be 'doing the work' but you have overall responsibility for it, and the lives of the people who work for you, so if something goes wrong, your neck is on the chopping board, not to mention people's livelihood, ability to pay mortgages etc are on the line.

That’s always been the way though. My great uncle was a director of a few companies, mining mostly and travelled a lot, all over the world and was an expert in his field. He left a lot of money when he died, and earned equivalent to £300K apparently back then.

He didn’t have a laptop as this wasn’t around back then but he would’ve had one now. His lifestyle probably cost him his first marriage, he never had DC (not 100% sure why) and he doted on my DM (his favourite niece).

He worked bloody hard though compared to his younger brother (my grandad, DM’s DF) but he was the youngest son and spoiled (as well as lived through 2 world wars as a child).

PTSDBarbiegirl · 28/04/2024 11:20

I begrudge a system that rewards those who boost capitalism and the huge wealth of others. Hedge fund managers, finance sector, IT etc etc while not rewarding any value or significant qualification to those who give insightful, skilled caring to those at the extreme ends of life. If babies and toddlers and elderly were prioritised as a group deserving of skilled, high quality care and paid accordingly it would benefit society. Those who save lives or improve lives in the public sector should be highly paid with access to affordable homes to encourage quality people to join or stay.
It says so much about our society that the situation is as it is now.

Appleandoranges · 28/04/2024 11:21

I don't begrudge high earners. But certainly low earners typically work longer hours and have harder jobs. High earners often enjoy their jobs and get social status and of course ££££ from them. They have typically niche skills coupled with knowledge of industry and good at getting through hoops eg interviews. Often hard working and committed to their career. But def don't think they work harder and have more stress than those in low income jobs.

Asiatoyork · 28/04/2024 11:23

6 figure earners usually get that as compensation for responsibility not how hard they work. Many on those salaries could be reputationally ruined or face jail if junior staff members screw up, so no, I don't begrudge them that salary

Yes, definitely all the bankers who fucked up leading to 2008 financial crisis were the main ones to pay the price.

SpilltheTea · 28/04/2024 11:28

I begrudge the managers I've worked with that were lazy, incompetent bullies, but that's it.

BIossomtoes · 28/04/2024 11:28

Mnetcurious · 28/04/2024 10:49

This may well be the case for many high earners. It’s definitely not the case for others.

It’s not. The highest paid job I ever had was the least stressful. It’s only a handful of people who sacrifice their lives to their career and those careers are relatively short lived because people burn out quickly.

idreamoftoddlersleepytime · 28/04/2024 11:30

Hard work does not lead to higher wages. Skills leads to higher wages. Most low earners work very hard indeed.

LakeTiticaca · 28/04/2024 11:30

High earnings tend to come with high pressure so no, I don't begrudge them. I'm happy as a (retired) supermarket section leader

Nicole1111 · 28/04/2024 11:31

“Would you be actually willing to put in the time and effort yourself?”

I begrudge high earners who think they are the only people investing time and effort. In my field (child protection) everyone invests a great deal of time and effort, often at a personal cost, but it’s not recognised financially. Overtime is unpaid. There’s no time to take toil. I also think there are plenty of other jobs that require a great deal of effort, such as care work or childcare, where the effort isn’t reflected in the pay. Attitudes that suggest people working in those roles are lazy and high earners are superior is part of the reason why services that are most needed in society are falling apart.

Tattletwat · 28/04/2024 11:34

Apart from the below which isnt jealousy problems with them earning that much.

But I hate the insinuation that it's only they work whoharder than other people, there is people on minimum wage who work hard so wind your neck in.

I do t like it when they come on here and piss and moan and make out they aren't on a high wage and are poor.

I do think that there ought to be limits that you can only be on a certain amount multiplied the lowest paid in your company. Then it keeps the company's wages fairer for all.

cupofteaandasliceofcarrotcake · 28/04/2024 11:36

@BusyCM has hit the nail on the head! From the tone of the OP message it's as if we have to feel sorry for high earners or respect them because they work SO hard and really earn every penny! I genuinely don't think you can compare the work a 'high earner' does to those who work in the care industry for very little money! I see people who are high earners go on business trips abroad and stay in extravagant hotels! They get bonuses each year that are quadruple, if not more, than some people's average wage! With high earning you should have responsibility, but you also get the bonus of being able to afford a nice lifestyle! What is the point of the post? Are we meant to be thankful for high earners? Respect them more? Think they work harder than everyone else! If you're a high earner and have time to post this question on Mumsnet it suggests, you don't work that hard.