Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think part of the increase in long term sickness is the increase in retirement age?

529 replies

Lazykitten · 21/04/2024 08:07

Thinking of the people I know who are long term economically inactive long term (I believe that counted as over 6 months) and nearly all I know who fall into that bracket are my parents and there friends. Dad was a factory sparky and mum was a cleaner. Dad stopped work at i think around 61, mum does part time caring now in her early 60s but really struggles and I can see her having to give it up soon.

Most of their friends had similar manual jobs and now in their mid 60s a lot are signed off sick waiting for pension. These are people who have had manual jobs since they were 15/16 and their bodies are knackered. They can't (and very little point) in retraining now for their last couple of years before they get the state pension.

I work in an office job so can feasibly see how I could work to my late 60s and beyond, but those who've done manual work for over 40 years have the wear and tear on their bodies that they simply can't. As well as other health problems & decreasing energy levels that come with ageing.

There's got to be a sizeable number of folk age 60-67 that fall in that bracket? And taking it further is it another stick to beat the working class with?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
LondonFox · 21/04/2024 14:04

Almostwelsh · 21/04/2024 12:48

There are issues I think with a lot more jobs now requiring good social skills than in the past, hence making it difficult for ND people for example. This is particularly an issue for young people, as older ND people may have already found a niche and have devised their own coping skills out of necessity. They are often not diagnosed, just seen as a bit odd sometimes.

OK, in the past Autism usually wasn't recognised unless it was severe, but a young person who struggled socially was likely to be able to get a job in a factory, or doing data input in an office and social skills werent really required. There are very few of those types of jobs now, most jobs seem to require frequent routine changes, agile working of some type, so the ND person becomes horribly anxious and cannot cope.

There is pleanty of factory jobs, filling shelves in a shop, cleaning, driving or doing other types of work that don't require special social skills.
Issue is that today parents expect every child to attend university and bang on about importance of a nice fullfiling career.
This mindset did not exist 70 or 50 years ago. If parents had child in ND group they sent it to some sort of simple trade apprentice route or to factory and it was career. No one expected rainbows and sunshine out of job.

I work in an office and have seen people totally uncapable of doing certain types of jobs due to their own limitations getting surprised they did not pass probation. And I fully blame their parents for not setting up more realistic expectations. Surelly you would not tell 170cm son to get career as professional basketball player.This is same, but ends up with young people discouraged of having any kind of work.
Great if you have bright kid but if their other characteristics limit social interaction you as a parent should help them find a career where it is not prominent.

sandieollsen · 21/04/2024 14:10

I agree about parents managing their children's expectations.

My nephew was fed the lie that he was a brilliant cricket player and "could" make the county team. So much so that he missed a lot of school due to playing for the school and another local team, didn't bother with homework, etc., as he was going to be a top cricket star so didn't need qualifications. Inevitably it all fell apart and he was never "talent spotted", so is now doing minimum wage work with a succession of dead end jobs and suffers on and off depression etc. He's a big strong lad and would have made a brilliant tradesman or car mechanic, fireman, or whatever, but he's there, stacking shelves in a supermarket on NMW.

vdbfamily · 21/04/2024 14:12

I think one of the things that frustrated me is that we don't have a culture of doing different jobs in the UK so once you can no longer manage what you did all your life, you stop working and claim benefits. There are lots of different jobs and some are less physical than others. If you cannot do one thing, see if there are transferable skills to do something else. As an Occupational Therapist I have seen many people with chronic disabilities working full time. I remember a young wheelchair user with Multiple Sclerosis who worked full time on a switchboard. She told me she would be far better off on benefits but the social contact of a job and having meaningful occupation daily was important to her.
I don't know the answer but it should always pay to be in employment. Another patient told me once that he would need to earn a minimum£40.000 ( 20 plus years ago) to be better off than on benefits. Obviously that's just 2 examples but I have current staff who won't work extra hours when needed as they just lose some UC in place of it. I know they will earn some extra but not enough to make it worth working.
Benefit s were designed to support people through difficult times.
People working for big companies where the CEOs earn millions, should never be on benefits, but should be paid enough to live on.

vdbfamily · 21/04/2024 14:12

I think one of the things that frustrated me is that we don't have a culture of doing different jobs in the UK so once you can no longer manage what you did all your life, you stop working and claim benefits. There are lots of different jobs and some are less physical than others. If you cannot do one thing, see if there are transferable skills to do something else. As an Occupational Therapist I have seen many people with chronic disabilities working full time. I remember a young wheelchair user with Multiple Sclerosis who worked full time on a switchboard. She told me she would be far better off on benefits but the social contact of a job and having meaningful occupation daily was important to her.
I don't know the answer but it should always pay to be in employment. Another patient told me once that he would need to earn a minimum£40.000 ( 20 plus years ago) to be better off than on benefits. Obviously that's just 2 examples but I have current staff who won't work extra hours when needed as they just lose some UC in place of it. I know they will earn some extra but not enough to make it worth working.
Benefit s were designed to support people through difficult times.
People working for big companies where the CEOs earn millions, should never be on benefits, but should be paid enough to live on.

Mrttyl · 21/04/2024 14:14

My work has changed massively since I started over 20 yrs ago. Lots of roles have been cut so the workload is higher. Emails are a total menace because they are so easy to send, you are copied into so many and people expect you to deal outside work hours. The quantity of pointless paper work that no one ever reads and that doesn’t improve anyone’s life is soul destroying Everything is taken extremely seriously and expectations are unrealistic. It used to be more fun. Loads of people at my work are off sick. Basically our work environment is too tough so add anything bad outside work and it sends people over the edge.

Happyher · 21/04/2024 14:21

I think it’s partly because of the long queues for NHS treatment. If they cured people quicker they could get back to work. Article on BBC website blames chronic pain, obesity related illnesses and mental health issues

Princessfluffy · 21/04/2024 14:23

We have a mental health crisis where most young people are unable to access the help that they need in a timely fashion (CAMHS services hugely inadequate).

There are long wait times for people signed off work for physio, surgery, talking therapies, consultant appointments.

It seems obvious that addressing this promptly and effectively makes sense both for the individuals affected, their families, employers and the wider economy.

Yet the government is not taking effective action and instead is putting the blame on individuals for being economically inactive. What a joke.

DancefloorAcrobatics · 21/04/2024 14:35

I think it's a complex issue, keeping wages artificially low for so long, increasing retirement age and current issues within the NHS are all contributing to the issue of long term sickness.
This is for some people, but not all as there is also a % that is genie unable to work.

But how can we judge, sort and encourage people who claim to be unable to work into work? How can we encourage employers to employ someone who has been out of work for months and years?
...

Themaghag · 21/04/2024 14:41

Churchview · 21/04/2024 09:54

I'm sure someone will come along and say, well, I'm 60 and still loving work and my career is on the rise, but speaking for myself I find that the nature of work has changed beyond all recognition since I started work in the 1980s.

As an older person the concept of enjoying working drifts further away from you every year. Work now is a minefield of wellness training, target setting, restrictions, appraisals, new concepts all the time that are a flash in the pan to show off some new manager's 'innovative ideas', presenteeism, zero hours, always being contactable.....until someone puts in a 'you don't have to answer this mail outside of work hours' rule.

Wages being worth less than a decade ago, promotion without incentive, not being able to afford rent or a house even if you work like a demon.

Couple in the loneliness of working from home, poor public transport if you're commuting and not being able to get a GP/hospital appointment if you're sick, it's a wonder any bugger manages to be arsed with work.

Honestly, it's exhausting. I gave up work early (very lucky enough to have a small private pension) because I just could not stand all the bullshit any more.

I took a volunteering job and gave that up because all the work bullshit was being applied even to volunteering).

Not universally, but a lot of work used to be set hours, unions, respect, security, promotions, meaningful pay increase and some level of certainty. It's bloody draining now. Work now is so unappealing. No wonder people are finding ways out - especially older people or young people who have had the Covid years to see that work isn't all.

Maybe I'm just an old duffer, but that's how it seems to me.

Your post interested me because after many years of running my own business and then working as a freelance since I turned 65, I took on a temporary full-time contract to cover maternity leave last year, which lasted for six months. The contract meant that I was doing the same type of work that I have been doing for the last 30 years, but I had to get to grips with a new computer system and also from working from home every day from 9.00 to 5.30. God, it was an eye-opener! Obviously, in my 70s I'm much slower than I was in my heyday and I have less energy, but I was staggered by the amount of things I was expected to accomplish for a very basic salary. In fact, the load was so onerous that I had to start an hour earlier every morning, finish an hour later and work through every weekend just to keep up. When the contract ended just before Christmas I was practically on my knees. And as you say so much of the extra load was bullshit - almost as if the company had gone out of its way to make things as difficult as possible with endless complex systems to navigate. Every day, I felt as if I was being asked to paint my hall, stairs and landing through the letterbox with a worn toothbrush. It was a smallish company - around 30 employees in total and everybody was expected to do the work of at least two people and consistently hit very tight deadlines. There were no proper plans or strategies in place and really important decisions were made on the hoof and instructions were frequently changed on the "Yes we do it like that but only if it's the third week after Michelmas, there's a full moon and it hasn't rained for three days - if it isn't we do it differently!" principle. If this is representative of today's office culture, I'm not surprised that people are suffering from burn-out and increasingly poor physical and mental health. Towards the end of my tenure, I had become a nervous wreck and after working consistently since the age of 16 and putting in regular 60-hour weeks when I had my own business, I can assure you that I'm no sissy!

venus7 · 21/04/2024 14:47

nervousweddingguest · 21/04/2024 08:54

My worry is the money... I have worked my entire life! I've always paid my stamp.

Yet when I retire... my pension payment (if it's still there when I retire) is exactly the same as someone who has contributed very little or nothing too theirs!

If it wasn't for my own independent private pension I'm not sure I'd cope on what the government give me

You've contradicted yourself.
You have a private pension, so don't have to struggle on a state pension.
Are you stating that those who haven't a complete record of contribution should receive less state pension than you? People...especially women......who don't have a complete record have often been caring for someone. Without a full, albeit meagre, state pension, how would they survive? The welfare system is based on each according to their need, not contribution. We all pay, some more than others. Some people have little illness or hospital treatment; it's insurance.

Lourdes12 · 21/04/2024 14:59

Long covid must count for a lot

penjil · 21/04/2024 15:01

ByUmberViewer · 21/04/2024 08:21

There is absolutely no point in working if you can't support yourself. Might as well be on benefits.

This.

The wages in this country are so poor in comparison to France, Germany, Sweden etc, it's shameful.

Also the state pensions are practically the worst in the western world, and combined with a cost of living crisis, it's not looking good for old people.

So I think a lot of people, young and old, are technically taking their "retirement" now, and letting the state pay. No point in working if you can't support yourself on the wages.

And we're not talking about the underclass here, we're talking about normal hardworking people who have simply had enough and can't take the strain anymore.

Themaghag · 21/04/2024 15:06

PensionMention · 21/04/2024 11:39

@beAsensible1 state pension is the same for everyone as long as you have 35 years full NI contributions. Certain benefits have the NI contribution paid for the person claiming the benefit. So as long as you have those 35 years stamps you get to currently enjoy 11,502 state pension per annum. Very few people are net contributors.

This only applies to those claiming the new state pension that came into being in April 2016. Those who retired before 2016 are only entitled to £169.50 a week as opposed to the £221.20 a week that is payable to today's retirees. If the state pension is their only form of income, the earlier cohort can claim pension credit to bring their earnings up to £218.15 a week if single, and £332.95 if living as a couple.

Autumn1990 · 21/04/2024 15:08

I wouldn’t have been able to work since covid as I developed an auto immune disease and the NHS didn’t actually provide any treatment. Hopefully after my next treatment I should be back to normal and if it hadn’t been for my GP demanding I got some treatment I would have been stuck being very ill. I’m self employed so have managed. I’m also in secure cheap housing.

The NHS waiting lists and lack of GP appointments mean minor issues become major ones and The cost of housing, rented or mortgaged and relatively low wages have led to this point.

AnonymousUser6 · 21/04/2024 15:09

bradpittsbathwater · 21/04/2024 10:38

I don't agree. I think there are more people off sick in their 20s, 30s, 40s. I'm in my late 30s and feel like the younger generation are much lazier than older colleagues

I think people are getting “lazier” because there is less incentive. Low wages mean you’re working to survive, with no holidays or ability to save towards a house. It’s demoralising selling your body - your physical and mental fitness - for so little in return.

vivainsomnia · 21/04/2024 15:10

Long covid must count for a lot
No it really doesn't! Especially amongst young people.

The wages in this country are so poor in comparison to France, Germany, Sweden etc, it's shameful
Not really when cost of living is higher there. They complain of the same issues.

Tumbleweed101 · 21/04/2024 15:11

Agree. Just because we are living longer it doesn't mean we can do the physical work past 60/65.

My mum died at 73. Before that she had chronic COPD and macular degeneration. From her mid 60's she wasn't capable of working due to these conditions so would have been on long term sick until retirement at the age it now is.

I'm approaching 50 and genininely can't see myself working in early years in my 60s I'm already struggling with knee pain from getting up and down off the floor and small chairs and just the general hypervigalance you need to watch a roomful of under 5s is exhausting.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 21/04/2024 15:28

vivainsomnia · 21/04/2024 15:10

Long covid must count for a lot
No it really doesn't! Especially amongst young people.

The wages in this country are so poor in comparison to France, Germany, Sweden etc, it's shameful
Not really when cost of living is higher there. They complain of the same issues.

Something like 1.99 m people have Long Covid.

So it does count for a lot.

Cherryon · 21/04/2024 15:28

YANBU, the #1 risk factor for work limiting health conditions is age, not life-style. The older you get, the more likely you will acquire a disability. There is a limit to how far up they can push state pension age because people will just be de facto retired on out of work benefits due to their poor health.

Cherryon · 21/04/2024 15:29

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 21/04/2024 15:28

Something like 1.99 m people have Long Covid.

So it does count for a lot.

Yeah, I agree with you as lots of young people got long covid. It’s not like long covid only affected older ages.

GinForBreakfast · 21/04/2024 15:34

Letsseeshallwe · 21/04/2024 08:45

Because for the majority having a manual job keeps them healthier and active for longer.

Not really, for many reasons like RSI and work related injuries. There’s also a difference between work-related activity vs leisure-related activity in terms of health benefits.

But as I said, it’s complicated as manual jobs are often done by people with other demographic factors that affect their health.

SpaghettiWithaYeti · 21/04/2024 15:37

Cherryon · 21/04/2024 15:29

Yeah, I agree with you as lots of young people got long covid. It’s not like long covid only affected older ages.

And that's just long COVID (which in itself is truly dreadful and disabling for many).

COVID has also triggered or worsened other conditions in many (eg. Autoimmune conditions.) and my charity is also helping a number of people with grants after they developed serious heart conditions following COVID infections.

I have had my condition (Myasthenia) my whole adult life at least but it has been much worse since a bad bout of COVID 3 years ago. And I know lots of people who have experienced the same (or who only first got myasthenia symptoms after a COVID infection)

RacingLine · 21/04/2024 15:38

I have long Covid and went to one of the long Covid clinics and they are full of young people

I hadn't had a day off sick from work in about 10 years and then I got Covid incredibly mildly but just never got better

I can work a bit but I'm lucky my job isn't manual in any way because if it was, I couldn't do it

Redlocks28 · 21/04/2024 15:38

Perhaps we need to start looking at adult education and skills training and encouraging people to move into teaching as they get older

You try teaching a class of 30 five year olds, one needing hoisting, 2 non-verbal needing nappies changing, dodging pupils biting and throwing chairs and constantly bending down over tiny chairs and people day in day out!

I really can’t imagine many knackered older people wanting to do this!

Themaghag · 21/04/2024 15:39

Ginmonkeyagain · 21/04/2024 12:03

The point about preventative action is a good one. Obviously luck and genetics play a huge part in health, but good diet and physical exercise is so important. The NHS is great but terrible at helping with preventative action to avoid poor health.

I am 46 and Mr Monkey is 55, I simply do not recognise the picture often painted here of wide spread serious physical deterioration and exhaustion at our age - Mr Monkey just ran the Boston marathon this week in just under 3 hours, we walked over 60 miles in the subsequent holiday in New York and are both back at work tomorrow. We both work full time - him in a demanding retail role.

Now that may change but right now we ensure we eat well, exercise every day and take care of our health.

I do hate this sort of unutterable self-satisfied smugness, which is very prevalent amongst the comments that follow articles in the Tory press. I know so many people who have lived exemplary lives, eaten well, exercised etc. etc. and died suddenly in their 60s. I know others who have continually burnt the candle at both ends, smoked, drank, taken drugs and lived to enjoy a ripe old age. And although there's no harm in keeping yourself as fit and healthy as you can, there really aren't any guarantees.

It's often the things that we can't control that cause the most damage - a freak accident, an unexpected illness, a sudden bereavement, a relationship breakdown, the illness of a close family member, the death of a child, the loss of a job, all of which can wreak havoc with our physical and/or mental health and our finances. If I were you Ginmonkey, I'd be fervently hoping that nothing untoward happens to either me or my older husband, because believe me, there's very little any of us can do to mitigate the effects that come at us out of leftfield.

And frankly, I don't think there's anything remarkable about your activity and fitness levels at 46 - Jeeze, I was in the best shape of my life in my 40s - just give it five years and see what the menopause does to you!