Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To worry that she hasn’t got autism - but will get diagnosed

282 replies

Laughterbutchaos21 · 16/02/2024 19:37

I am fully aware that I may be jumped on and I’m willing to accept that.

I have a daughter who is in year 5, she never really shows any traits at home ( does have strong interests ) she has great conversations/ eye contact / no sensory issues to clothes. I am aware it is a spectrum.
school had some difficulties with being overly passive / struggling with certain situations so wanted her to be assessed. This was 2 years ago and I genuinely didn’t think much of it.
stop to a few weeks ago we got an appointment through for an ados assessment followed by an assessor with a community paediatrician.
we went to ados and I sat at the back of the room, but was allowed in as long as I didn’t talk to her etc
I mean the test was done with someone she has never met before I think any child would have found it strange and been anxious.
some of the toys / sections were quite young like watch her play with figures etc.
it was really interesting to see the assement.
fast forward to the community paeds consultant appointment, she asked me a bunch of questions and then told me at the end that although she can’t give me the ADOS score until the the review appointment when the SLT who did the ados will also be there but that she already has the report
and based on his report / school questionnaire and her assessment that the likelihood is that she will be diagnosed.
now I am not saying it’s a bad thing, she is still the same child I love dearly today as she was yesterday but I’m generally shocked and a little confused.
I asked if it was anything that I said that lead to this outcome and she laughed and said no you said the opposite to everyone else.
how does someone in 1 hour long ADOS assessments see more than I have in 10 years ??
can this ADOS assessments tell between it just being an anxious child at the time ?
I think I’m just concerned that she is being diagnosed with something for the rest of her life when I am unsure

OP posts:
Unexpectedlysinglemum · 17/02/2024 13:09

Laughterbutchaos21 · 16/02/2024 20:06

@MamaAlwaysknowsbest I was sort of mutual. The issues was raised years ago when she was 5 and she didn’t even score higher enough by that doctor to have an ADOS and I didn’t push.
when it came back around I agreed to the assessment yes because it was highlighted that she wouldn’t cope in mainstream school but I didn’t understand why and this was apparently the first step.
i didn’t think she would get an autism diagnosis though - I assumed anxiety and other contributing factors to do with her complex life.

What's her complex life, do the assessors know all about it? If you look up the Coventry grid it shows how signs of autism and attachment disorders can often over lap

Hughs · 17/02/2024 13:15

Laughterbutchaos21 · 17/02/2024 12:38

Hi all
I really didn’t mean to cause offence or an argument- it all just came as a hit of a shock to me. We have had a really hard 10 years and a lot of medical difficulties to contend with so this just came as a bit of shock.
I am not upset because I don’t want her labelled as autistic, suppose I was just trying to understand.
she is still the same girl but I will of course do everything to support her if and when issues arise.

It's not your fault OP, just a couple of posters taking the chance to come out with the usual shite. I hope you have had some useful perspectives and good luck!

ThatLemonBird · 17/02/2024 13:33

Hughs · 17/02/2024 10:09

And looking back on many posters- the list of professionals involved repeatedly mentioned: SLT, psychologists, occupational therapists and PHYSIO. Funny that you’ve missed that one. Oh but you know best don’t you, since you think a physio in mental health is as qualified and experienced as a GP receptionist. I’d say that poster has way more clout than you and your personal opinions.

Are you the same poster?
Physios are not involved in the diagnosis of autism, it's quite mind blowing that you think they are. In terms of autism diagnosis, yes they are as qualified and experienced as a GP receptionist, or a heart surgeon, or a paramedic.

Here's a useful link which explains which health professionals are involved:

www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/topics/diagnosis/professionals-involved/non-clinical-professionals

Weird how just after that poster stopped posting and many of their posts got deleted, this new one popped up to voraciously defend them.

Hughs · 17/02/2024 14:12

Weird how just after that poster stopped posting and many of their posts got deleted, this new one popped up to voraciously defend them.

Indeed. And with such detailed knowledge of what the first poster thought and meant by their posts. Hopefully gone back to their cave never to return.

booksandbrooks · 17/02/2024 14:22

I don't think you have an up to date notion of what autism is / how it often presents in girls.
Either way YANBU - your feelings are valid.

Laughterbutchaos21 · 17/02/2024 14:59

@Unexpectedlysinglemum she was born with some pretty significant birth defects ( heart etc ) she didn’t come home until she was nearly 2 and has spent a lot of time in and out of hospital since
she also lost her dad.

OP posts:
Barbarachicken · 17/02/2024 15:07

Hughs · 17/02/2024 11:27

I find how MN HQ let ASC ableism go in a way they don’t with less hidden disabilities quite scary. They really seem to be quite mis informed and behind the times.

I agree - it's really shocking that their only appearance on this thread was to defend someone posting such offensive, ableist shite. The post claiming that adults look up autistic behaviours so that they can pretend to be autistic and get a diagnosis is still there.

As someone diagnosed with autism as an adult it's pretty clear that I am not welcome here.

Absolutely agree

ImaniMumsnet · 17/02/2024 20:53

Hi @InattentiveADHD , thank you for your response. We will always remove any posts reported to us that break our talk guidelines including ableist and derailing posts. As we're a post-moderated site, if no one reported those posts you mention, there's every chance we haven't seen them, but we are always happy to have a look. So if there are some posts you believe we have missed, please hit the report button and these will come straight through to us.

InattentiveADHD · 17/02/2024 21:25

ImaniMumsnet · 17/02/2024 20:53

Hi @InattentiveADHD , thank you for your response. We will always remove any posts reported to us that break our talk guidelines including ableist and derailing posts. As we're a post-moderated site, if no one reported those posts you mention, there's every chance we haven't seen them, but we are always happy to have a look. So if there are some posts you believe we have missed, please hit the report button and these will come straight through to us.

You have completely misunderstood my post. Or certainly your response suggests you've misunderstood it. Perhaps this quote from a pp says it better than I did:

"This thread is so depressing. People despising labels and it's just a few quirks and it's so easy to get a diagnosis and suggesting that adults are reading up on the typical behaviours and then feigning autism to get one. And yet it's allowed to continue, with MNHQ popping up briefly to tell off ND posters when they challenge someone making ableist and offensive remarks. I didn't realise MN was such an unfriendly forum for the neurodivergent."

I thought the MN post telling ND people off from defending themselves against ableism extremely inappropriate. The poster we were being told not to respond to had multiple posts deleted and kept posting despite that and despite the responses she was getting. And yet WE were the ones told not to respond to her?!? Think you have things round the wrong way.

This thread has continued in the same vein with the same old inaccurate, ignorant and misleading comments by multiple posters now but the only comment MN has is to tell the NDs off.

I quite like MNs "hands-off" moderation. So I don't think you should necessarily be weighing in on all of this. But what I do object to is being told off for defending ourselves against ignorance as if we are bullying!! That's really not ok.

SecretSquare · 17/02/2024 21:37

@InattentiveADHD 👏👏👏

Hughs · 17/02/2024 21:54

@ImaniMumsnet

Can I support @InattentiveADHD here.

ND posters on this thread have been sneered at for being "triggered" and "professionally offended" for challenging ableist assertions such as diagnoses are given out like sweets and adults pretend to be autistic to get a diagnosis. They have been told they are "living in a make-believe world", "obsessional", "defensive" and "not rational". Autistic people have been told to "educate yourself" and "consider counselling to look into why you are so easily offended and triggered".

It is unbelievably awful that your only presence on the thread has been to defend an ableist and offensive poster, it really looks like you condone that kind of behaviour.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 17/02/2024 23:14

Howbizarre22 · 17/02/2024 07:20

Telling someone their opinion is “bullshit” just because it differs to yours could also be considered “light years beyond offensive.”

The reason it’s a now 2.5 year waiting list seems mainly because of the volume of people now being referred for assessment not because it’s a particularly difficult assessment. What that poster was meaning is that if someone wanted to be diagnosed, it wouldn’t be difficult as there aren’t any objective markers (ie scan results, blood tests)- markers are either entirely subjective or could be mimicked or misdiagnosed . Yes that’s troubling for people with genuine diagnosis and belittiles their experience and condition but it seems she was saying there is actually scope for misdiagnosis especially where someone is keen to be diagnosed.

You say the other poster made “unfounded” comments because their experience and opinion of this differs to yours where you feel it’s so difficult to be diagnosed and its historically under diagnosed but that is your OPINION and your experience. There are other posters too on this thread saying they or their child was misdiagnosed, or that on some occasions they received a diagnosis very quickly- so just because you have your experience of being diagnosed doesn’t mean it is the way it is for everyone.
Their opinion is no more “unfounded “ than yours . Yet You speak like you know absolutely everything about this and are shutting down anyone that has a different opinion, calling it “bullshit” and you are “offended.”

Sorry you are coming across incredibly defensive, aggressive and obsessional about this topic to the point that you know best and any differing opinions or experiences don’t count.

someone wanted to be diagnosed, it wouldn’t be difficult as there aren’t any objective markers (ie scan results, blood tests)- markers are either entirely subjective or could be mimicked or misdiagnosed

Do you really think that the diagnostic professionals would be so easily fooled?

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 17/02/2024 23:21

Howbizarre22 · 17/02/2024 07:49

That’s what it seems like. That old saying springs to mind “what is normal anyway?” Are we not all just a little different yet society has forced us into a box of what “normal” social behaviour should look like where some of us are better at conforming to this than others? Are people being diagnosed as ND because they don’t meet social norms of behaviour?

Believe me, autism is so much more than not conforming to social norms of behaviour. It's about being unable to understand social norms of behaviour. It's about experiencing sensory overload from stimuli that neurotypical people consider tolerable or even desirable, such as loud pubs. Neurotypical people don't walk around with noise-cancelling headphones on to keep traffic noise out. They don't walk around wearing sunglasses on a cloudy day. They don't have to wear sunglasses in the office. The majority of NTs have jobs, but only a minority of autists do.

We are not "all on the spectrum" and it's insulting to minimise autism in that way.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 17/02/2024 23:34

mitogoshi · 17/02/2024 09:12

@TheSnowyOwl

Unfortunately the trend now for diagnosis based on mild traits is devaluing and belittling to a certain extent those with profound difficulties as result of their autism. My DD's autism is moderate I suppose, she struggles to work, forming friendships is more challenging, she certainly can't read the room at all, can be a grown up stroppy toddler basically - she has made progress in many ways but when she is rejected for support because "she can work" benefits don't recognise her difficulties now whereas even 5 years ago it wasn't a problem. I state her issues and she is told "others work" they haven't seen her problems (50 years ago she would have been institutionalised I suspect) so yes these "mild" cases annoy me

Stop pitting high-masking autists against low-masking autists. The failure of DWP to recognise autism as a spectrum condition and assess each disability benefits applicant as an individual is not the fault of high-masking autists seeking help.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 17/02/2024 23:41

Howbizarre22 · 17/02/2024 09:47

Talk about living in a make believe world. The poster was not ableist at all. There was zero discrimination in those post so how dare you compare it to racism or sexism. She was saying that in her experience- she notices a lot of people SELF DIAGNOSING adhd and a massive increase in recent referrals. A current obvious trend. Also speculation that the assessments are not always hard evidence as they are subjective without any specific objective results and there have been, as pps say, many cases of misdiagnosis and some assessments being fairly quick. As another poster said, a lot of “mild” cases being diagnosed and people being told they still have to work etc which undermines the difficulties experienced by those with profound autism or adhd who simply cannot go to work.
Reslise that there is a thing called free speech and you can’t just censor someone for airing their views and speculating on current trends if they are not hateful or discriminatory, like the pps. Just because you are overly offended doesn’t mean you are right and they are wrong and you can brand it “ableist” when it is clearly not.

What she initially said, that @MNHQ deleted, was that diagnoses were being handed out like sweets.

She then back-tracked to saying that a lot of people were self-diagnosing, some groundlessly or misinterpreting symptoms of something else.

What we are all objecting to is the first thing she said. Diagnoses are not handed out like sweets. Claiming that they are is a flat lie. She tried to bolster her opinion by implying that she had a relevant medical qualification when in fact she is a physio.

Watercolourpapier · 18/02/2024 06:50

It's simply not true that mnhq delete disablist posts. I reported about 6 offensive posts yesterday. Only one appears to have been deleted.

Hughs · 18/02/2024 07:32

Watercolourpapier · 18/02/2024 06:50

It's simply not true that mnhq delete disablist posts. I reported about 6 offensive posts yesterday. Only one appears to have been deleted.

So the excuse of not knowing because nobody had reported was all bullshit then? They have evidently looked and decided that ableism is fine and challenging it is not 😢
I get enough of this shit in daily life. MN is not for me.

Tanger1neDream · 18/02/2024 08:05

Watercolourpapier · 18/02/2024 06:50

It's simply not true that mnhq delete disablist posts. I reported about 6 offensive posts yesterday. Only one appears to have been deleted.

Wow that is really bad, there were plenty to choose from.

Futb0l · 18/02/2024 08:19

There’s been an absolute explosion of people diagnosed with this in the past couple of years- you can’t deny that just a couple of years ago the diagnosis was quite rare to now it being absolutely everywhere. Unless youve been hiding under a rock.

This. Yes, our understanding of autism, particularly how it presents in girls, has improved. But its important to be aware that the diagnostic criteria of what constitutes autism have expanded significantly over the last 30 years. This means we now diagnose people who previously were not considered to be severely or specifically impaired enough to meet criteria for diagnosis.

Tanger1neDream · 18/02/2024 08:38

Futb0l · 18/02/2024 08:19

There’s been an absolute explosion of people diagnosed with this in the past couple of years- you can’t deny that just a couple of years ago the diagnosis was quite rare to now it being absolutely everywhere. Unless youve been hiding under a rock.

This. Yes, our understanding of autism, particularly how it presents in girls, has improved. But its important to be aware that the diagnostic criteria of what constitutes autism have expanded significantly over the last 30 years. This means we now diagnose people who previously were not considered to be severely or specifically impaired enough to meet criteria for diagnosis.

No we simply have a better understanding of how autism can present( and yes thankfully now in women and girls)

The previous ICD-10 described autism as “A group of disorders characterized by qualitative abnormalities in reciprocal social interactions and in patterns of communication, and by a restricted, stereotyped, repetitive repertoire of interests and activities. These qualitative abnormalities are a pervasive feature of the individual's functioning in all situations".

Myself and my children would have been diagnosed then too.

Thankfully also the DSM-5 Manual criteria is now just “clearer and simpler than in the previous version of the DSM, and sensory behaviours are now included. This is useful as many autistic people have sensory differences which affect them on a day-to-day basis. It now includes 'specifiers' to indicate support needs and other factors that impact on the diagnosis.

Futb0l · 18/02/2024 08:41

Compare to dsm 3.

Honestly I'm not lying. Its factual to say that diagnostic criteria have been broadening. They have.

Mummadeze · 18/02/2024 08:59

Hi OP, I think it is good that your DD has potentially got her diagnosis early and before secondary school because so many autistic girls seem fine until about 13 or 14 but then secondary school can be hell if they do not have adjustments in place. My DD was always anxious and phobic and had OCD so this was picked up but she didn’t get her official autism diagnosis until last September (14 years old). By this point her secondary school were assuming she had these needs anyway but her anxiety got so bad she couldn’t attend lessons a lot of the time. There were many many times I questioned what was going on with her throughout her life. People had asked me if she was autistic when she was much younger and I was kind of offended or surprised as she seemed shy and nervous but she was also happy and chatty and didn’t have the typical symptoms that I was aware of. Fast forward to her teens and she is actually very obviously autistic now. Hates noise, crowds, eye contact is poor, doesn’t speak much unless v comfortable at home, can’t cope with change, the list goes on. I am not sure why she was able to mask better as a younger child but there is probably a medical explanation. It does come as a shock though, so it is understandable that you are feeling how you are. But I wouldn’t worry about the ‘label’ per se because you and your DD can do what you want with the information. If she is coping well with life and school you may not need to reference it, but it will be a good thing if you reach a point where she does need some more support which is probably quite likely in the end.

ImAlwaysknackered · 18/02/2024 09:28

I think my daughter is also ND OP. She's 14. Incredibly shy. Has anxiety, suffers from emetophobia, struggles with periods. She also displays some repetitive behaviours, she can often be found pacing her bedroom floor chucking a Teddy up and down. She has very specific interests and becomes obsessive. Hates change, she once shouted at her aunty for helping me change the lounge round. Can't cope with noise.

I approached school and they said the only thing they noticed was that she's very quiet. So basically if they referred her to the GP/paeds they'd reject it as she appears fine there as she's academically bright.

It's a minefield! I'm told the assesors who do the observations are very well trained and are looking for the signs of ASC that we wouldn't even notice. I would trust their opinions completely.

Swipe left for the next trending thread