This.
It has already been stated on this thread that sleep issues can be a feature of Autism, but not a cause. Stated by people with direct knowledge and experience of Autism and how it has either affected them or their children. It is obnoxious to seemingly apportion blame of lack of sleep - and infer therefore that parents are somehow to blame for not trying harder with their Autistic children in this vein - ergo screens, attachment, and any form of parenting in general. (as seems to be the case with the weekly Autism threads)
The AIBU currently stands at 92% You Are Being Unreasonable.
Why is it OK for certain posters to apparently 'idly wonder' about the 'cause' of this particular disability?
Why is it OK to suggest cures and therefore imply eugenics?
Why is it OK that the OP has not stated their intention or motivation behind these threads (given that they have history of similar) It's blatantly click baity, and I'm fairly sure I have enough awareness to realise myself that such titles are, and have been in the past, created specifically to be goady.
Why is it OK that at least half a dozen people have reported this thread, yet nothing has been done about it? Not worthy of deletion? Fair enough, but explain your reasons, MNHQ. Does it not even warrant a message to say something, anything, on behalf of the dozens of people on this thread that are disgusted with the ongoing attitude to Autistic people?
Why is it OK to repeatedly make parents feel like shit about our kids having Autism? We already shoulder the burden of probably passing it on to them unknowingly due to the pattern of many parents being diagnosed after we see traits in our own children. Yes, there's a pattern here. Yes, we are acutely aware, thank you. No, we do not want to go back to the bad old days of sterilising disabled adults. Again, eugenics.
Why is it OK that its always about Autism?
Why is it OK that some people are upset at the rise in diagnosis of Autism? Why and how does it affect them personally? Why do I feel like my life is being questioned? My daughters life is being questioned, and therefore our authenticity is being called into question?
Would MNHQ let this stand if it was questioning the validity or 'cause' of Downs Syndrome, for example?
Note: I specifically used Downs Syndrome in this instance, as I have experience of it. My sibling was born with Downs Syndrome in the 1973. The bigoted attitude and direct questioning of my mother along the lines of "what did you do wrong in your pregnancy?" I thought we had left behind in the 1970's.
I know MNHQ have been monitoring this thread. I reported it at lunchtime and received the ubiquitous "we are looking at it now" then nothing else. Oh but they were quick to delete the post calling out the OP in the strongest terms.
Ask yourself this (OP, and MNHQ) wouldn't you be offended if this felt deeply personal to you? Would you walk away? Or would you get angry and call it out? Why don't you see that it is blatantly offensive? Why don't you see that this is massively offensive?
Stop questioning things you know nothing about, OP. And start protecting disabled people as the law states, MNHQ.