Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What do you think the sentence should be for murder?

165 replies

Dumbo18 · 02/02/2024 20:50

Obviously there are many different circumstances but after today’s sentencing for the awful crime committed I couldn’t help but feel anger when I seen the sentence - I feel this with most murder sentences. I’m going to get flamed on here but here it goes… I just don’t agree with rehabilitation for these sort of crimes, main reason being why the hell should they get that opportunity? Child murderers, multiple murderers, serial rapists - you’ve ruined countless lives so why should you get another chance at life? I know that’s a view most people don’t have but I feel strongly about it and don’t get me started about what sentence these monsters should be handed!

OP posts:
Densol57 · 03/02/2024 17:25

OpalOrchid · 02/02/2024 22:46

No you wouldn't.

Oh you know me do you ?
righto ! 🤣

and yes I would, gladly 🙄

RichardMarxisinnocent · 03/02/2024 17:27

Flickersy · 03/02/2024 16:31

You've only got to see on this thread how many posters are fantasising - in cold blood and not under duress - about torturing or killing people to understand that all of us are capable of doing truly horrible things. Which is why it's in our interests to have a fair justice system which doesn't apply extreme penalties like the death penalty, and where whole life tariffs are only applied in very rare circumstances.

As to those who don't understand how sentencing works - life always means life. Unless you have the conviction quashed, you will carry that sentence for the rest of your life. You don't have to be in prison to serve a sentence.

I completely agree with all of this.

scorpiogirly · 03/02/2024 17:32

The death penalty for murder and rapists. Mind you, there was a woman who I think killed her husband or partner because he had been interfering with her child, she deserves a medal.

Doyoumind · 03/02/2024 17:45

scorpiogirly · 03/02/2024 17:32

The death penalty for murder and rapists. Mind you, there was a woman who I think killed her husband or partner because he had been interfering with her child, she deserves a medal.

Andrew Malkinson spent years in prison for a rape he didn't commit. He spent longer in prison than he should have because he maintained his innocence. But you'd have had him killed.

I agree with the PP who said the responses on this thread show many people are willing to kill based on their own screwed up idea of justice. That's no better than being a murderer. What about people who kill for vengeance? Do they get a free pass?

Chylka · 03/02/2024 17:56

MN feels overrun with daily Mail readers at the moment 🤦🏻‍♀️

gnarlynarwhal · 03/02/2024 18:17

I believe that if you take someone’s life - especially a child’s life, then you should never be freed from prison. You gave up your right to freedom the moment you took their life.

JesusMaryAndJosephAndTheWeeDon · 03/02/2024 19:29

Fionaville · 03/02/2024 16:07

My knee jerk reaction would be a life for a life, but there are too many factors to have a blanket, one size fits all sentence.
What if a woman, had been getting beaten up by her husband for years and one day she killed him while he slept?
Or somebodies child had been sexually abused and their parent flipped and murdered the perpetrator?
Should they get the same sentence as a child killer?

Then they use the defence of provocation or diminished responsibility and they aren't found guilty of murder but of manslaughter which does not carry a mandatory life sentence.

JesusMaryAndJosephAndTheWeeDon · 03/02/2024 19:31

WhatWhereWho · 03/02/2024 13:10

Which does not mean life does it?

Yes it does, as has been explained. It does necessarily mean in prison until death but it means you are serving a lifetime sentence and are never properly free.

CeriB82 · 03/02/2024 19:45

Hanging or the firing squad

Dumbo18 · 03/02/2024 19:49

It is interesting reading everyone’s views. Of course murder can vary - a woman murders her husband after years of abuse is not the same as a parent murdering a child. I don’t think it’s one size fits all but I do still think the premeditated murders of the most innocent people deserve the worst punishment. Levi Bellfield, Lucy Letby, Ian Huntley and the numerous parents of innocent children who have been starved and tortured over the years absolutely do not deserve to see the light of day again but yet they get 3 meals, tv’s, visits from family and even fan mail - if you’re asking would I lose much sleep watching them take their last breathe… absolutely not

OP posts:
Lavenderosa · 03/02/2024 19:54

If they've murdered one of my loved ones then I'd like the option to kill them in the manner of my choosing. I genuinely feel that I could kill them myself - I'm not proud of that but it's my honest response.

That's why we have to have a better system than raw vengeance so I oppose the death penalty (even more so as miscarriages of justices do happen). Long prison sentences have to be the option and we all know that for some cases, there will be no chance of rehabilitation because the killer is beyond help. Part of me also wants them to suffer years of imprisonment rather than death.

TheBerry · 04/05/2024 16:56

Plannymcplanface · 02/02/2024 21:51

Re the death penalty. If someone murdered my kids, sure, I’d want to kill them with my bare hands. An ugly but perhaps natural instinct, and one that some people commenting on threads like this often seem to indulge in, to gain a sense of moral superiority. However, we have a flawed justice system capable of convicting the innocent even with the most advanced forensics. For that reason alone the death penalty should not be used. Second, I am also against it on libertarian grounds that the government shouldn’t have the right to lawfully kill. Third, revenge is not a good basis to improve society when there is potential for reform. The offer of assisted suicide to convicted murderers with 30+ year tarif is an interesting idea though.

Totally agree with you.

I can understand the primal urge to want to kill someone who’s hurt your children, for example, but that doesn’t mean as a society we should factor bloodlust or vengeance into our sentencing. Emotional bias is a very poor foundation for law and I find it kind of scary that so many people seem to think the death penalty is permissible based purely on the fact that they feel angry, or vengeful, or think the criminal “deserves” death. Seems like very short-sighted thinking.

girlfriend44 · 04/05/2024 20:20

Which murder is this?
Have you a link?

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 04/05/2024 21:16

It's referring to the murder of Brianna Ghey

SammyScrounge · 18/07/2024 21:21

Duh · 02/02/2024 22:35

Tell that to Derek Bentley’s family, or Ruth Eliss’

I'm glad you brought up Bentley. After he was executed, the police had an Amnesty for weapons. Criminals filled skips with guns and weapons. They even took to frisking one another before they set out on a job in case some hothead was tooled up because they knew that under joint enterprise law, they'd all hang if a victim was killed.
It is possible to have some sympathy for Bentley until you remember that he had been warned over and over not to associate with his partner in crime who liked to brag that he was going to kill a police officer. And Bentley knew that.
Gun crime became more and more common after they stopped hanging. Now the streets of London aren't safe.
I'm not a proponent of hanging. But really, sweeping statements that hanging is no deterrent is just sloppy thinking. There are good arguments in favour of hanging as well as against.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread