Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you have a baby at 50?

1000 replies

pumpkinpatch6 · 16/01/2024 01:01

Off the back of the "Do you regret having a baby at 40" thread, would you have a child at 50 assuming you can provide for it emotionally and financially? Obviously medical assistance would be needed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
3luckystars · 16/01/2024 07:56

No way, not for a million. Having one at 39 was very difficult and I feel too old at times. It’s a young persons game.

But I’m not you and you should tread your own path!!

ScarlettSunset · 16/01/2024 07:56

If I found myself accidentally pregnant then I would proceed with the pregnancy (as long as all was fine etc) and have the baby. I wouldn't deliberately set out to become pregnant at that age though.

theDudesmummy · 16/01/2024 07:58

I had a baby at 46, he is now 14 and I am 60. Don't regret that at all but I wouldn't have had another one at 50, even if I had been able to. I can't say though, what I would have done had I not fallen pregnant for the first time until 50 (had no other children of my own although had stepchildren).

DonnaBanana · 16/01/2024 07:58

I was going to say no but you said “assuming you can provide for it emotionally and financially” so maybe yes assuming this covers a full time nanny to do all the night feeds 😂

merrymelodies · 16/01/2024 07:58

No. I had my 2nd DC at 40 and that was my limit. Physically and emotionally. Also, he's 20 now but being a single parent to a troubled and angry teen was exhausting. I probably would have coped better had I been younger and more energetic. No regrets, though. I love my boy! ❤️

PriOn1 · 16/01/2024 07:59

No, it’d be utterly exhausting. I accept I’m privileged to have already had children though. If I hadn’t, I might feel differently and I expect there would be physically fitter 50 year olds who would cope better than I would have.

MyStarBoy · 16/01/2024 08:00

@SickOfSoreFeet
It’s simply an expression.

HowNice23 · 16/01/2024 08:00

Nope.

Changed18 · 16/01/2024 08:01

I think if you hadn’t had previous children it might be fine. You’d potentially be 71 before they were financially independent though.

Soontobe60 · 16/01/2024 08:01

Hell no!!
Had one in my 20s then again in my 30s. That was enough.

MissingMoominMamma · 16/01/2024 08:02

I have more energy now I’m on HRT, so I’d definitely consider fostering or adoption (I’ve done both before), if DH agreed (he won’t).

But to physically go through birth feeling how I did before HRT? No.

watermelonsugar56 · 16/01/2024 08:04

Not for me personally as I’d be too exhausted. But if someone was able to and give their child a great start in life then fair play. Just the negative points you’d have to consider too, obviously. None of us know what’s round the corner though.

Gunnersforthecup · 16/01/2024 08:05

Vettrianofan · 16/01/2024 07:14

I've made sure there won't be any accidents and no babies anywhere close to 50. I have four already and have no desire to have my sleep trashed again! I'd sooner take a long walk off a short cliff. When I am 50, my eldest will be 26.

We had wanted another one, but had given up actively trying. I did decide that a third would be too much though! and took some steps to avoid that.

Re the idea that having a baby can be immediately followed my menopause, I'm sure that's possible.

However, I've also heard that having a child relatively late can go along with a late manopause, and that often people will have periods for another 10 years or so after that last birth.

I'm sure there's a lot of natural variation!

Bordesleyhills · 16/01/2024 08:05

Mum at 38 and 40- I can do it now but no way in 10 years - not the toddler stage

Bex5490 · 16/01/2024 08:06

DH and I happily fantasise about our 50s when youngest will be 18 and we can abandon our house and kids to go travelling!

No way would I have kids at 50. But not sure what I would say if I didn’t have them already 🤷🏽‍♀️

merrymelodies · 16/01/2024 08:06

Love my DD too, of course. I had her at 37. Both my children have brought me so much joy; honestly they are the best "thing" that's ever happened to me. But parenting is jolly hard work, so much more so as an older single parent.

Goatymum · 16/01/2024 08:06

Absolutely not!! I’m in my early 50s and I feel very different health wise to how I was at 40 (I had DCs in early 30s).
My late mum had me in her early 40s, I had ‘older’ parents who were old fashioned and both had died by the time I was 30.
Men have kids later, but old sperm is not good and they’re not the ones having to give birth or (usually) be the main carer.

istoodonlegoagain · 16/01/2024 08:07

Cannot imagine having a baby at 40,let alone 50. I'm exhausted, body is very sore, I think it's peri. In secondary school I had a friend who was a miracle baby when her DM and df were 48 and 54 respectively. Her df died when she was 7 and her DM seemed absolutely ancient when we were 12/13. She was an only child and we are 42 now. She has basically been her dm's carer from a very early age, couldn't go to university, go on holiday for more than a few days or move out. She's still alive and my friends life revolves around her. She has to work low paid jobs so that she can be very local as her DM needs a lot of care. It's so sad really.

itsmyp4rty · 16/01/2024 08:09

You'd hit retirement age before they hit adulthood. I think it's selfish to have a child so late in life.

Tiredalwaystired · 16/01/2024 08:10

As well as anything else, the idea of funding university education on a pension is frightening!

HNY2024 · 16/01/2024 08:10

The vast majority of people saying no are people who already have children. If you didn't have kids and had wanted them for a long time, then you might feel very different.
Friend (41) is finally pregnant with her 52 year old husband and, when they told me, I almost shuddered at the thought - but that's because I'm sensing light at the end of the tunnel with my own almost-independent kids. For my friends, it's a new and long-awaited adventure.

Dais79 · 16/01/2024 08:11

@Sasqwatch Not even slightly ridiculous - after 35 the risk of miscarriage is higher, as is the risk of complications in both pregnancy and birth. Not to mention other factors such as a higher risk of chromasomal conditions. If women are happy to take these risks then fair enough, but I wasn't so completed my family by age 30.

flapjackfairy · 16/01/2024 08:13

i adopted a baby at 50 so it's a yes from me.

Threewheeler1 · 16/01/2024 08:14

Nope.
Personal choice obviously, but not something I'd willingly do in a million years.
Am 50 now and, as well as 2 teenagers, I have my mum to care for.
Plus wider family issues (finances/illness/wayward siblings etc), life just seems to get really complicated in middle age (surely this should be getting easier🤔?)...
Add a bit of never ending perimenopause and general feelings of 'I need to get in a cupboard and hide', and it's a magical time already...👉💩
Just the thought of a baby in the mix tips me right over the edge.
Sorry, that sounded really negative - there are also good bits, like the thought of getting a bit of independence back! 😬

OhmygodDont · 16/01/2024 08:14

I’d rather stick pins in my eyes. In my 50’s and 60’s I want to enjoy handing grandchildren back not raising a baby/toddler again. I want to be sipping cocktails on a sunny beach as far away from the school runs as possible.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.