@Newchapterbeckons I understand your outrage over the risks of the strikes to the health of the general public.
BUT....I don't think you fully understand some of the things you're arguing.
No one is asking for a straight up 35% rise. They are asking for a rise and then salary to be rectified over the coming years. That should then meet the 35%.
17 year old may not be "going into medicine" as in they are not practicing doctors. But they are applying to university courses to start medical degrees in order to go into medicine. Some people have been preparing for it since they were much younger.
Strikes are usually a last resort of any workforce. Not a single one of those doctors is striking because they don't care about the patients. They're striking because their working conditions have deteriorated over time and no one has done anything to stop that.
Based on some of the answers on this thread, the starting salary of a JD is less than that of an accounting graduate. Now I'm not saying accountants don't deserve the salary. But, based on the responsibility placed on doctors, actual peoples lives depending on them, do you not think this is the wrong way round? Trainee managers at Aldi earn more and the salary progression is also pretty good.
The professional memberships and insurances also have to come out of that salary. So it's reduced even before they start on their bills. If we want doctors to be available to treat us, they need to be able to support themselves and their families.
I'm not saying strikes are a perfect way to go about anything, and I do worry about being able to get treatment for me and my family if we need it. But, how they have gotten to this point is a LOT more complicated than you are making it out to be.