it also illuminates how many financial barriers to justice there are in this country.
It's absolutely astounding (or maybe it isn't really) that it's just accepted that justice is usually available for anybody who is rich enough to pay for it.
The law of this country seems to be based wholly around the desires and conveniences of the wealthy and powerful, and the only interest in involving the ordinary little people is when they can put them in the dock and convict them, whether justified or not.
There really should be some kind of legislation to prevent very rich people and corporations from wearing down their much poorer opponents by simply making them spend all of their money, and then swooping in and stealing a march on them once they're broke. Once it's very clear that somebody is trying to buy the result that they want, this should be severely punishable; not just accepted as the way it is.
This reminds me of at least one case I know of (and I'm sure there must be loads more), where Tesco were determined to build a controversial new store in a small town where the council were keen to stop them, for various reasons. Tesco got their way in the end, as the council were honest about the fact that Tesco could and would just keep on appealing until the council was skint and they would win anyway, so the council said they may as well just give in at the start. I believe this is what's known as 'British justice'.