Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Europen governments need to respond to immigration?

564 replies

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 06:45

So the Netherlands is going to have a far right government.
Sweden has moved to the right.
Finland has shut its borders.
Countries that have traditionally been liberal are hardening and irrespective of the many issues listed its to do with immigration.

Ireland has seen violent protests last night following a series of stabbings.
In the UK we obviously had Brexit.

I think governments need to start responding to voters feelings on immigration as if they don't we will continue to see a general slide to the right in Europe, when actually these countries aren't right wing: it feels like a single issue is distorting the entire political landscape?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Dbank · 24/11/2023 10:39

I think the OP is right, especially in the light of the 2022 net migration figures of 750K for the U.K.

While we may benefit from their cheaper labour costs, they still add to the pressure on housing, benefits, schooling, healthcare etc. Yes I know they pay taxes, but generally low amounts if at all.

I may be wrong, but I expect the conservatives to take a harder line, and will be rewarded for it in the next election, they seem better at reacting to the national sentiment, than how people think in North London.

Myfabby · 24/11/2023 10:40

Thebestwaytoscareatory · 24/11/2023 10:36

I think governments need to start responding to voters feelings on immigration as if they don't we will continue to see a general slide to the right in Europe

Indeed, and they can start by focusing on something they have more control over....emigration.

Time for Europeans to put their money where their mouths are and ban all outward migration from their countries. If you don't want them coming here then you shouldn't want us going there.

However, I imagine any attempt at something like that would be met with outrage, seen as an attack on the human rights, and be political suicide.

This!

Imagine suggesting as some have that migration should be limited to women only, or young men only. So Tom can move to Spain, but has to leave his wife of 15 years behind? Hilarious thinking

AdamRyan · 24/11/2023 10:40

IMustDoMoreExercise · 24/11/2023 10:07

Because Europe has never had mass immigration from non-white and non-Christian countries in the past.

Europe has been anti-semetic and so there is no reason why it can't be racist as well faced with mass non-white and non Christian immigration.

This is just not true.
Large parts of southern Europe were Muslim until the middle ages - that was what drove the Crusades
There has always been movement of people who are being persecuted e.g. the Jewish diaspora in Roman times
There has always been movement across empires from colonised countries
And in prehistory there were waves of migration that we can track in our genetics.

Humans are a species that move around, there's really no such thing as "indigenous" in Europe, its a fiction people tell themselves to justify their innate xenophobia

EasternStandard · 24/11/2023 10:42

TempestTost · 24/11/2023 10:23

I think it's inevitable this will happen.

That being said, you really have to talk about the refugee system, and then other kinds of immigration.

Both are important but the refugee system is where there is a huge problem on the horizon that is not just up to individual countries to deal with, and the systems and many regulations are essentially international.But it's a system that was crafted at a very different time, and it's simply inadequate to manage what's coming. Part of the reason (not the only reason) it's those small countries that are responding first is that in such a small place it's clear that it would be possible to be overwhelmed very easily. No one can fool themselves that they can absorb so many people, either in terms of the infrastructure of social democracy, or in terms of maintaining a distinct social fabric.

The majority of people IMO see this and want to try and find solutions, but it's extremely difficult. My sense is that they are going to end up being an investment in creating stability in people's own places.But then I can't really see that as being adequately effective either.

But certain sections of the progressive left seem to want to make it impossible to even get to a place where such discussions can happen, because they are so convinced that the answer is just, let people go where they want, the west should support them anyway as a kind of penance. And that will end up with people moving more right, politically, in terms of voting choices. This is one of those areas where you get a funny historical blindness, as it was at one time widely understood that the kinds of infrastructure you find in social democracies requires a relatively small, stable population with controls on immigration.

The other issue of course is managing declining population. One thing that will have to happen is a better approach to getting our own workers into the jobs we need, when they maybe aren't considered the most glamorous (farm work for example), and also training people properly rather than relying on poaching trained people from other countries to work cheap (or not so cheap.). Mechanization may come into this somewhat, though my intuition is that will be a mixed blessing.

This is a good post, sums it up well

bombastix · 24/11/2023 10:42

this government are actually in charge of the migration policy and 1.2 million people entered the U.K. legally in the last two years. That's not on a bunch of North Londoners who aren't in government, it's Tory policy.

Change it, okay. But don't give them credit if you think migration is an issue. It's never been greater.

Dotjones · 24/11/2023 10:45

AdamRyan · 24/11/2023 10:40

This is just not true.
Large parts of southern Europe were Muslim until the middle ages - that was what drove the Crusades
There has always been movement of people who are being persecuted e.g. the Jewish diaspora in Roman times
There has always been movement across empires from colonised countries
And in prehistory there were waves of migration that we can track in our genetics.

Humans are a species that move around, there's really no such thing as "indigenous" in Europe, its a fiction people tell themselves to justify their innate xenophobia

See also the Mongols who conquered their way from the Far East to Europe.

The whole idea that Europe never faced mass immigration is ludicrous. I thought it was commonly accepted that human life began in Africa. Literally everyone in Europe is descended from someone who migrated here. That's why it's so important to stop it happening now.

Myfabby · 24/11/2023 10:46

Dbank · 24/11/2023 10:39

I think the OP is right, especially in the light of the 2022 net migration figures of 750K for the U.K.

While we may benefit from their cheaper labour costs, they still add to the pressure on housing, benefits, schooling, healthcare etc. Yes I know they pay taxes, but generally low amounts if at all.

I may be wrong, but I expect the conservatives to take a harder line, and will be rewarded for it in the next election, they seem better at reacting to the national sentiment, than how people think in North London.

You need to support your thinking with facts.

For one, The largest contributor to non-EU immigration (39%) was study. Students paying 3x as much as home fees. What benefits are they claiming? They in fact heavily subisidize home student fees.

No one chooses to read the entire report. The number of people emigrating out of the UK long term was 508,000 in the same period.

skyknight · 24/11/2023 10:46

I really hate the way anyone opposed to the importation of violent people from cultures that have no respect for women, other religions, minorities, homosexuals are always smeared as "far-right". Surely it is these ideologies that are "far-right", not the politicians or voters who are opposed to such things?

cansu · 24/11/2023 10:46

I think our government need to stop spouting rubbish and should start recognising that we need immigration to staff our health and social care sector. My fs is cared for by people who have come into the country on visas like this. They are kind and hard working. They are badly needed by this sector. The government know this and yet here we have Robert Jenrick trying g to prevent these visas being issued. This shows they are using immigration as a political football rather than considering what our country needs.

IMustDoMoreExercise · 24/11/2023 10:48

AdamRyan · 24/11/2023 10:40

This is just not true.
Large parts of southern Europe were Muslim until the middle ages - that was what drove the Crusades
There has always been movement of people who are being persecuted e.g. the Jewish diaspora in Roman times
There has always been movement across empires from colonised countries
And in prehistory there were waves of migration that we can track in our genetics.

Humans are a species that move around, there's really no such thing as "indigenous" in Europe, its a fiction people tell themselves to justify their innate xenophobia

I was talking about the last 100 years, not the middles ages.

People only care about recent history,

MrTiddlesTheCat · 24/11/2023 10:49

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 07:14

@Pooooochi
I agree with your idea. Maybe we could remove people's ability to apply for their families to come over and join them as a starting point

'We'll take your hard labour for the benefit of ourselves but your kids can fuck off.' What a way to attract the brightest and best to Global Britain.

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 10:49

What I don't get is why after decades and decades of huge emigration, the Internet, a more globalised world, countries outside Europe haven't started thinking "hmmm, maybe those guys have got something, maybe we should create secular democracies too".

I also don't buy that "the west" is responsible for financial and political instability that creates mass immigration outside Europe. Don't these countries have governments?

OP posts:
Myfabby · 24/11/2023 10:49

IMustDoMoreExercise · 24/11/2023 10:48

I was talking about the last 100 years, not the middles ages.

People only care about recent history,

only ignorant people care about recent history. You can't pick and choose what suits your narrative.

AdamRyan · 24/11/2023 10:50

skyknight · 24/11/2023 10:46

I really hate the way anyone opposed to the importation of violent people from cultures that have no respect for women, other religions, minorities, homosexuals are always smeared as "far-right". Surely it is these ideologies that are "far-right", not the politicians or voters who are opposed to such things?

It is "far right" to generalise immigrants as "importation of violent people from cultures that have no respect for women, other religions, minorities, homosexuals".
That's a disgusting thing to say.

These are human beings who choose to come here for a variety of reasons, not objects we are "importing". And there is no evidence they are more violent than the population in general, or that they will somehow change the culture here to align with the culture they are leaving behind.

Myfabby · 24/11/2023 10:51

skyknight · 24/11/2023 10:46

I really hate the way anyone opposed to the importation of violent people from cultures that have no respect for women, other religions, minorities, homosexuals are always smeared as "far-right". Surely it is these ideologies that are "far-right", not the politicians or voters who are opposed to such things?

importation!!!!! they are people not chattels!

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 24/11/2023 10:54

AdamRyan · 24/11/2023 10:40

This is just not true.
Large parts of southern Europe were Muslim until the middle ages - that was what drove the Crusades
There has always been movement of people who are being persecuted e.g. the Jewish diaspora in Roman times
There has always been movement across empires from colonised countries
And in prehistory there were waves of migration that we can track in our genetics.

Humans are a species that move around, there's really no such thing as "indigenous" in Europe, its a fiction people tell themselves to justify their innate xenophobia

That’s absolutely not true for the South Eastern part of Europe.

They were occupied by the Ottoman Empire, but it was not until the Middle Ages and these parts were Christian.

bombastix · 24/11/2023 10:54

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 10:49

What I don't get is why after decades and decades of huge emigration, the Internet, a more globalised world, countries outside Europe haven't started thinking "hmmm, maybe those guys have got something, maybe we should create secular democracies too".

I also don't buy that "the west" is responsible for financial and political instability that creates mass immigration outside Europe. Don't these countries have governments?

I think it's just ignored how much blood and war there has been in Europe to get where we are. These nice liberal democracies are in most cases in Europe maybe less than 70 years old. The idea that Europe is always like that is to ignore the history. And perhaps immigration isn't all about business but what sort of society you actually want.

IMustDoMoreExercise · 24/11/2023 10:56

Myfabby · 24/11/2023 10:49

only ignorant people care about recent history. You can't pick and choose what suits your narrative.

Of course you can. You can't go back to the start of time. You have to be reasonable.

A lot of people don't even know what happened before they were born let alone the middle ages and I wouldn't expect them to know any more than 100 years.

IMustDoMoreExercise · 24/11/2023 10:58

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 10:49

What I don't get is why after decades and decades of huge emigration, the Internet, a more globalised world, countries outside Europe haven't started thinking "hmmm, maybe those guys have got something, maybe we should create secular democracies too".

I also don't buy that "the west" is responsible for financial and political instability that creates mass immigration outside Europe. Don't these countries have governments?

Because religion is the only was to control the masses. A lot of people in those countries are uneducated.

RedToothBrush · 24/11/2023 10:59

Cattiwampus · 24/11/2023 07:12

EU expansion won’t help.
Sweden and Ukraine want to join to counter Russia’s possible land grabs.
If Albania and Serbia join, that’s unlikely to halt a far-right, nationalist trend in the EU.

Serbia and Albania will not get the vote they need to join anytime in the next twenty years.

Despite what anyone here might say.

Ukraine's application looks like it's about to stall hard and fast due to financial and political reasons (posted about this last night on the Ukrainian thread).

Lifesd · 24/11/2023 11:00

I would support that @Finlesswonder!

Notonthestairs · 24/11/2023 11:01

Increased migration is the current Governments policy.
They have increased visas.
They will continue to increase visas.
They know it increases tax take and they need trade deals.

Blaming increased levels on 'north London' is ridiculous. Look to Westminster if you want answers.

The real failure is the Government telling voters one thing whilst doing something else.

DdraigGoch · 24/11/2023 11:02

Chaitales · 24/11/2023 07:21

Esp when western government intervention has created a lot of these migrants in the first place - I recommend noam chomskys how the world works for a good insight into this

It's not the west who have done this. Many of the migrants come from countries where the Wagner group has a presence. Putin is stirring up trouble in order to destabilise the west.

RiderofRohan · 24/11/2023 11:05

Finlesswonder · 24/11/2023 10:49

What I don't get is why after decades and decades of huge emigration, the Internet, a more globalised world, countries outside Europe haven't started thinking "hmmm, maybe those guys have got something, maybe we should create secular democracies too".

I also don't buy that "the west" is responsible for financial and political instability that creates mass immigration outside Europe. Don't these countries have governments?

Well, financial and political instability hardly started yesterday. Much of it stems from centuries of plundering by European colonisers, so yes in many respects, the west is to blame for a lot of instability in the world. Look at the current mess in the Middle East. Thanks Britain.

Now those countries that were not colonised in the last few hundred years don't have the same excuse and ought to have their ducks in a row.