I recently went to a wedding where the couple said they didn't want any gifts but if you wanted to give something then they would appreciate a contribution towards their honeymoon. I have no issue with this, its easier and you haven't wasted your money on something they don't want. I wanted to give what I thought was a decent contribution so gave 100 pounds, but I also feel money is impersonal and I like using my wedding gifts and remembering people so I also gave them a 60 voucher so they could buy something for their home (a contributing factor was after the bank transfer I thought 150 was fairer as the bride has been quite generous to my DC in the past).
However ... here's my AIBU ... they aren't going on a honeymoon. In the scheme of things its not a big deal, I just think it was a bit cheeky as I probably would have just given the voucher instead. I know its technically still money, but I feel its different than just transferring money to a bank account and it basically will just go into a mass and be forgotten which was the reason for giving a voucher as well. Just curious what others think.