Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel sad seeing a 7 week old baby at DC's nursery today

999 replies

comfysketchers · 20/11/2023 14:35

Dropping my 15 month old off at nursery today before work and there was another woman there at the same time handing over a 7 week old sleeping baby.

He was absolutely tiny and I just felt so sad looking at him thinking that he barely even knows he is out of the womb and his mum is dropping him off to spend all day with strangers in a noisy nursery environment.

I should also add that I live in a country that has excellent parental leave from the government plus most private companies pay at least 10 weeks of full pay on top of that, with many paying much more than that.

YABU - It’s perfectly normal for a 7 week old baby to spend 8 hours per day in a nursery.

YANBU - A 7 week old baby should be at home with its mum.

OP posts:
IDoughnutKnow · 20/11/2023 20:59

MargotBamborough · 20/11/2023 20:47

Well then perhaps all the people who believe nursery is tantamount to child abuse should volunteer to pay a special optional tax to fund all the women who would like to stay at home for three years.

Well, as things stand, I (as a tax payer) pay for other people's children to attend childcare settings, which I'm not in favour of - so I'd be happier for my tax to be funding women who otherwise couldn't stay at home with their children.

As things stand, I'm contributing to a system I disagree with. At least I'd agree with part of it if all mothers had the same amount made available to them and could use it either to pay for childcare or to stay at home with them.

I never used the 15 hours of nursery funding which was available when my children were small, but if I'd had the equivalent amount, I'd have spent on a National Trust/Historic Houses season ticket or some such.

BellaCriesAndThatsAlright · 20/11/2023 20:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oh fuck off. Are you really this stupid? I can assure you I have raised my children

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 20:59

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 20:57

Yet those numbers are tiny compared to women who make flexible working requests or become SAHM's.

Which is exactly what would happen again with 2-3 years of parental leave.

I work in HR. They're steadily increasing. Even compared to last year I've seen a massive increase, particularly as employers are starting to make their paternity leave policies more generous.

Hibiscrubbed · 20/11/2023 21:00

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 20:56

Well let’s be frank what the fuck does it bring to your life apart from childcare costs? Exhaustion? Distraction? Conflicted feelings? Family friendly holidays’? Mess and expense?

What is the point?

Genuinely.
If you hardly ever see or enjoy them?

😂 I see them plenty. And I love them. And they’re so bright and beguiling and clever and better than everyone else’s children. That’s why. I enjoy teaching them things, travelling with them (took them both to New York at under two weeks old) and seeing them grow.

Why does anyone have kids?! Do you honestly believe you love your children more?!

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:00

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 20:57

I do remember it, actually. I remember the difference between my mum being home and being at work. I certainly remember being sad when she didn't collect me from school.

I remember having a SAHM.

....I work full time.

BellaCriesAndThatsAlright · 20/11/2023 21:00

IDoughnutKnow · 20/11/2023 20:59

Well, as things stand, I (as a tax payer) pay for other people's children to attend childcare settings, which I'm not in favour of - so I'd be happier for my tax to be funding women who otherwise couldn't stay at home with their children.

As things stand, I'm contributing to a system I disagree with. At least I'd agree with part of it if all mothers had the same amount made available to them and could use it either to pay for childcare or to stay at home with them.

I never used the 15 hours of nursery funding which was available when my children were small, but if I'd had the equivalent amount, I'd have spent on a National Trust/Historic Houses season ticket or some such.

"National Trust/Historic Houses season ticket"

This must be a parody account

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:00

BellaCriesAndThatsAlright · 20/11/2023 20:59

Oh fuck off. Are you really this stupid? I can assure you I have raised my children

How? If they spent 5/7 in nursery. Do the maths.

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 21:01

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:00

I remember having a SAHM.

....I work full time.

And I remember having a working parent, and I was a SAHM. Neither of our experiences is more valid than the other.

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:01

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 20:59

I work in HR. They're steadily increasing. Even compared to last year I've seen a massive increase, particularly as employers are starting to make their paternity leave policies more generous.

How close is it to 50/50?

Hibiscrubbed · 20/11/2023 21:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Have you lost your tiny fucking mind?! 😂 are you seriously writing this offensive bullshit? Or are you drinking?

MargotBamborough · 20/11/2023 21:02

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 20:58

I've already answered that question, you don't agree with me and that's fine, but it doesn't change my answer. I don't agree on plenty of things my taxes get spent on, but we live in a democracy so it's rightfully out of my hands.

I wouldn't worry TBH as no one really thinks the rights and needs of children are of any great importance in Britain, so I can't imagine it will be a huge priority for any of the major political parties. Your taxes are quite safe.

There are about 750,000 births per year in the UK. You want to pay for several million working age people to stay at home for several years at a time because you believe nurseries can't possibly be a good environment for children?

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 21:02

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:01

How close is it to 50/50?

I would say amongst my London clients it's averaging about 60/40. Less so outside London, more like 70/30.

BellaCriesAndThatsAlright · 20/11/2023 21:02

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:00

How? If they spent 5/7 in nursery. Do the maths.

Yes I am very good at maths. Engineer. Do you know how many hours are in a day?

Parker231 · 20/11/2023 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The nursery didn’t raise our DT’s anymore than the breakfast and after school clubs did. They provided excellent childcare. We did the raising of them.

Festivemoose · 20/11/2023 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What a deeply unpleasant thing to say.

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:03

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:00

How? If they spent 5/7 in nursery. Do the maths.

That's a very short sighted view of raising children.

They don't provide for them financially for a start.

Wait, maybe SAHM's don't raise their children either.

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:04

Hibiscrubbed · 20/11/2023 21:00

😂 I see them plenty. And I love them. And they’re so bright and beguiling and clever and better than everyone else’s children. That’s why. I enjoy teaching them things, travelling with them (took them both to New York at under two weeks old) and seeing them grow.

Why does anyone have kids?! Do you honestly believe you love your children more?!

😂😂 I have no idea how to answer you. Is this a joke? You took a two week old baby to NY as a teaching exercise? In what exactly - capitalism? Gun and gang warfare?

MargotBamborough · 20/11/2023 21:04

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:00

How? If they spent 5/7 in nursery. Do the maths.

Unless you have homeschooled your children the same applies to you.

Do the maths.

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 21:04

MargotBamborough · 20/11/2023 21:02

There are about 750,000 births per year in the UK. You want to pay for several million working age people to stay at home for several years at a time because you believe nurseries can't possibly be a good environment for children?

I mean actually, if we are talking about childcare reform, I would like to pay for nurseries to have more members of staff and to actually pay those staff a proper wage rather than the joke wage they currently receive. But yes, I would also like parents to be given the option to stay at home with their children should they wish to. As has been pointed out on this thread, not everyone would wish to, so we aren't talking about all 750,000 children, are we?

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:04

Festivemoose · 20/11/2023 21:03

What a deeply unpleasant thing to say.

It’s the truth though.

BellaCriesAndThatsAlright · 20/11/2023 21:04

This thread is becoming hilarious😂

Lastchancechica · 20/11/2023 21:05

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:03

That's a very short sighted view of raising children.

They don't provide for them financially for a start.

Wait, maybe SAHM's don't raise their children either.

Poor you. So limited in outlook.

IDoughnutKnow · 20/11/2023 21:05

SouthLondonMum22 · 20/11/2023 21:03

That's a very short sighted view of raising children.

They don't provide for them financially for a start.

Wait, maybe SAHM's don't raise their children either.

What about SAHMS with a private income?

I provided financially for my children. I was still a SAHM.

Hibiscrubbed · 20/11/2023 21:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Chilottane · 20/11/2023 21:06

I've just worked with a company that gives new fathers (or partners, in the case of same sex couples), 6 months paid paternity, which is amazing. I hope more places start doing that instead of the absolutely inadequate two weeks they currently get.