Johnny Depp and his Sauvage advertisements

[Cluborange666]

Whatever your feelings about the American court case, he remains convicted of abuse here in the U.K. Yet I keep seeing him in the Sauvage advertisements everywhere. A sad state of affairs for women everywhere if this is considered acceptable. Must be very triggering for women who have experienced DV.

But when what she made me do was use unpleasant language and how was by repeated physical violence which he was screamed at for trying to ‘hide’ from and which escalated to finger joint severance… Maybe not the same situation anymore.

Sauvblanctime, would you like him to slap you first?

Mythago, eh?

Yes,he has.Three UK high court judges found him to be abusive to Amber Heard.

Hehehe!! But I still would! 😆

Oh find some dignity JD, you look like a grubby old boozer in need of a scrub. Speaking of which, I unwisely watched Louis Theroux Pete Doherty interview yesterday, wondered how he would come across as all I have heard of him is tabloid gossip. Gosh he's mediocre. And his fingernails were filthy. Ugh.

I would not be happy if any son of mine wore it

@OneFrenchEgg sorry can you please define shagging distance? I would like to ensure I keep myself a safe distance away from people I have no interest in shagging....

😂😂😂 I think this depends on body part size and state of undress...

Cutting about. Feeling all smashing

He's a wife beating piece of shit

His behaviour in the american trial was exactly how my wife beating piece of shit of a father behaved. Can spot what he is a mile off

Cannot understand how anyone witnessing footage / recordings etc of him, (plus didn’t he settle with a film crew member that he attacked around the time of the trial?) + hanging out with Marlyn Manson who seems straight out of the same playbook to me can want to have his sausage or whatever the comment was above. He was found in UK court to be a wife beater. Can’t understand why Dior are throwing money at him (he looks foul) except to play to his rabid base. I suppose they’ll hire Russel brand next.

He doesn’t have a criminal conviction for abuse.

However, it continues to be horrifying how women supposedly support other women, ‘I believe you’ and all that until it’s a has-been heartthrob with evident substance abuse issues and very very questionable friends. ‘But iTs CapTaIn JaCk, ooo he was hot 30 years ago, oh he’s pulled sad puppy dog eyes and gets his guitar out like a hippy student, poor man couldn’t help hitting out at a woman half his age, trying to be a Hollywood old boy with a sexy young thing on his arm. How dare she not sit back and be used by an old soak ☹️🥺’.

Me too, but he's no longer my number 1 - drink and drugs are a turn off

I’m into that actually. 😈

You laughed though right 🤣

Found the Pick Me…

The pick me? 🤣🤣 sorry my sexual preferences and kinks don’t align with yours Mum.

Nobody cares about you ‘sexual preferences’ or made up kinks based on low self esteem, daddy issues or need to please porn addled men. But yes, coming on a thread saying how much you love an old alkie and would enjoy being smacked when discussing domestic abuse makes you a pick me. At best.

I always see it as Sausage!

A pick-me girl is a woman who obsessively desires male approval and validation, often at the expense of other women.

you have absolutely no idea about me.

we weren’t talking about dv, we were talking about an advert.

im not tellling you my story, but male approval and validation is the very bottom
of my list.

go & clutch your pearls elsewhere love

im not tellling you my story, but male approval and validation is the very bottom
of my list.

Sure it is, unless it’s Johnny Depp in which case you’d love for him to validate you with a bit of a slap, right? Or just his ‘sausage’.

We are talking about DV. The whole op is about how a man like JD has advertising work despite the very publicly documented evidence about his behaviour.

Trolls will be trolls

I can’t argue with stupid.

JD was proven innocent.

JD was proven innocent.

No. This is no more true than the OP.

There was no criminal case, the question of ‘innocence’ wasn’t at hand. His behaviour is documented and undeniable (and not just regarding AH, I mean his discussions with Manson would have been enough to end anyone else’s career), but he hasn’t been found criminally liable for any wrongdoing. You are quite right in how you can’t argue with stupid though.