Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think scrunch bum leggings look fucking shit

487 replies

shockwaze · 25/10/2023 20:35

Even the name is horrendous

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
WinterDeWinter · 26/10/2023 11:44

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 07:11

The patriarchy is a bullshit concept to help feminists come to terms with the fact that most women do not share their dull, anti-sex world-view. See also “internalised misogyny”.

Heaven forbid a young, heterosexual woman enjoy and thrive off male attention!

I see Clarkson's managed to re-register again.

WinterDeWinter · 26/10/2023 11:45

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 26/10/2023 09:13

I’m still trying to get round the thought that someone actually believes that the fashion industry, magazines, cosmetic houses etc are dominated by……women. ( I nearly wrote men there, my incredulity seeping through to my fingertips).

That has not been my experience, either observed or IRL. I think :

Men like to control how women present in public. In some cultures, they like to enforce ‘modesty’ , so women have to cover certain parts of their anatomy, at the extreme they cannot go outside their home without being covered from head to foot in a concealing garment, sometimes even the face is totally covered and there is only a small slit for navigation.

The brief period of ‘equality’ which some women strove to achieve has meant that women in some cultures have the ‘right’ to dress ‘ as they choose’ . So those societies have persuaded women that the ‘best ‘ way to utilise that choice is by increasingly revealing and sexualised clothing. Because for both societies, women are sexual objects, to use or preserve without reference to their wishes.

What she said.

SurprisedWithAHorse · 26/10/2023 11:53

They're ridiculous but they're just a crap trend, not the collapse of society. There have always been sexualised fashions aimed at young women and some people will like them.

Leave them, ignore them, the trend will pass and everyone will be laughing at them in a few years.

FreddiesTeeth · 26/10/2023 11:54

WinterDeWinter · 26/10/2023 11:44

I see Clarkson's managed to re-register again.

😂😂😂

therealcookiemonster · 26/10/2023 12:15

no matter the fact that someone would have to pay me a lot of money for me to even try on a pair of such ugly, uncomfortable and unhygienic leggings.... women should be free to wear what they want. of course societal conditioning may result in women participating in their own exploitation/oppression and the only way to avoid that is to stop judging each other and bring up our daughters and sons to be free thinkers who see through the social conditioning and make true independent choices.

Responsibilityisyours · 26/10/2023 12:20

Some look even worse at the front!
Really tacky

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 12:23

AfterWeights · 26/10/2023 11:02

most fashion designers, clothes makers, make-up artists, beauty entrepreneurs, aesthetic doctors, beauty & fashion marketing executives, fashion magazine editors are women.

This is 100% not true. Most cosmetic surgeons etc are men. Head designers at a few big clothing names:

Dior - gianfranco ferre (m)
Lv - nicholas ghesquiere (m)
Burberry - daniel lee (m)
Prada - miuccia prada (f)
Chanel - virginie viard (f)
Ralph lauren (m)
Nike - john hoke iii (m)

A huge amount is dominated by men

You’re wrong. Most aesthetic doctors are women. Plastic surgeons (of which over a third are female anyway) do not only work in cosmetic surgery. Practitioners of Botox, fillers etc. are not surgeons, and the majority of them are women.

The Beauty industry is completely dominated by women. Take some of the biggest beauty brands to launch in the last few years: Charlotte Tilbury, Trinny Woodall, Fenty Beauty, Kylie Cosmetics, Huda Beauty, Pat McGrath, Victoria Beckham - all have female founders.

It is completely batshit to suggest that men dominate the fashion and beauty industry in 2023 and are somehow forcing women to spend time and money on their looks.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:10

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 12:23

You’re wrong. Most aesthetic doctors are women. Plastic surgeons (of which over a third are female anyway) do not only work in cosmetic surgery. Practitioners of Botox, fillers etc. are not surgeons, and the majority of them are women.

The Beauty industry is completely dominated by women. Take some of the biggest beauty brands to launch in the last few years: Charlotte Tilbury, Trinny Woodall, Fenty Beauty, Kylie Cosmetics, Huda Beauty, Pat McGrath, Victoria Beckham - all have female founders.

It is completely batshit to suggest that men dominate the fashion and beauty industry in 2023 and are somehow forcing women to spend time and money on their looks.

Are they designing clothes that hurt or restrict movement though? When women design clothes, they design dresses with pockets, not hobble skirts.

I don't see Trinny peddling leggings that are designed to go up your butt crack either.

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 13:18

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:10

Are they designing clothes that hurt or restrict movement though? When women design clothes, they design dresses with pockets, not hobble skirts.

I don't see Trinny peddling leggings that are designed to go up your butt crack either.

No, but they’re behind skincare and make up routines that take hours of women’s lives each week, not to mention hundreds of pounds out of their bank accounts each month.

Men aren’t spending hundreds of pounds and dozens of hours on skincare and make up each month therefore…. patriarchy again?

Or is it simply entrepreneurial women like Trinny Woodall and Huda Kattan making products that enable women to do something they get joy out of?

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:31

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 13:18

No, but they’re behind skincare and make up routines that take hours of women’s lives each week, not to mention hundreds of pounds out of their bank accounts each month.

Men aren’t spending hundreds of pounds and dozens of hours on skincare and make up each month therefore…. patriarchy again?

Or is it simply entrepreneurial women like Trinny Woodall and Huda Kattan making products that enable women to do something they get joy out of?

So, how come women are conditioned to "get joy" out of putting crap on their faces every day and men aren't? And it is conditioning: in other parts of the world we see both sexes in makeup for ceremonies but not worn daily, both sexes wearing kohl, etc.

Who benefits from women putting crap on their faces? And how many really enjoy it versus being scared or ashamed to be seen in public without it? And how come some women resist the conditioning and don't wear it anyway?

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:36

Usernamen · 26/10/2023 07:11

The patriarchy is a bullshit concept to help feminists come to terms with the fact that most women do not share their dull, anti-sex world-view. See also “internalised misogyny”.

Heaven forbid a young, heterosexual woman enjoy and thrive off male attention!

I enjoy masturbating. Sex is fun when I can find a man who is remotely competent in bed, which is becoming increasingly rare these days.

It was two rapes that I was less keen on.

Women don't need male attention to thrive. That's a really unhealthy emotional dependancy to encourage there. Who in their right mind encourages women to rely upon men for their self-esteem?

SurprisedWithAHorse · 26/10/2023 13:38

As a small point of fact, as stupid as the leggings look, they don't go up your crack. The ruching is all on the outside.

TheLonelyGoatTurd · 26/10/2023 13:41

SurprisedWithAHorse · 26/10/2023 13:38

As a small point of fact, as stupid as the leggings look, they don't go up your crack. The ruching is all on the outside.

But you can see two distinct halves, it’s got to be going somewhere.

bronkie · 26/10/2023 13:42

Moonmelodies · 26/10/2023 05:39

I've seen parades where some of the guys wear bottomless chaps, does that count?

That's usually pride parades and yes indeed they are drawing attention to their arse for other homosexuals.

bombastix · 26/10/2023 13:43

Ruching is a fashion crime anyway. These pants just make it really clear that ruching accentuates and doesn't distract the eye at all.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:52

bronkie · 26/10/2023 13:42

That's usually pride parades and yes indeed they are drawing attention to their arse for other homosexuals.

I don't think that mainstream male fashion can be extrapolated from what leathermen wear to Pride.

SillyAutomatic · 26/10/2023 13:58

I don't consider myself a pearl clutcher, but when a garment is so obviously designed to elicit sexual desire it's not prudish to question the appropriateness of such, especially in the gym, school run or Tesco! There's a time and a place FFS!
And are we seriously still questioning that the patriarchy exists?

Cultural history of the buttocks

Cultural history of the buttocks - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_history_of_the_buttocks

bronkie · 26/10/2023 14:00

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/10/2023 13:52

I don't think that mainstream male fashion can be extrapolated from what leathermen wear to Pride.

That wasn't the point the original poster made. It was a female v male thing.

LadyBird1973 · 26/10/2023 14:02

There's nothing wrong in wanting to be seen as sexually attractive to other people, but there's something wrong when this is the primary consideration, irrespective of circumstances. When a woman is doing the school run, or exercising or shopping in Tesco, and especially in the workplace, those are not the appropriate times to be presenting herself in a highly sexualised fashion.
I want the men I come into contact with in daily life to see me as competent, to be listening to what I say, interacting with me as an equal human being - I wouldn't want them to be thinking about shagging me or focusing on my arse, while I'm trying to have a professional conversation.

People have lost the notion of appropriate time and place for certain clothes and behaviour. Although tbh, I'm not convinced there is any appropriate time to wear those leggings.

JFT · 26/10/2023 14:20

IMO these scrunch bum leggings are repulsive. I've seen a lot of them ever since lockdown when they first became fashionable.

I live in 'fashionable' a high density inner city area and notice everyone from joggers who are legit exercising to young women just hanging or cyclists, or roaming in the high street wearing them. Notable the actual art students and fashion students are not wearing anything of the sort.

As much as I find them ugly as heck and also feel a bit violated having to unexpectedly look at someone's bum crack and / or labia in detail when I'm minding my own business, the thing that strikes me the most is that anyone is brave enough to wear them! I'm in shock and awe at their confidence and boldness mainly.

Recently I was sitting chatting with a friend on a bench in a very public busy inner city area. A woman walking her dog loitered in front of us for ages in a pair of skin tight shiny satin scrunchy bum shorts. As the dog was sniffing about the edge of our bench her genital area was right up close and personal in our eyeline, I was so shocked to see every aspect of her front and rear parts, she might have well just been naked, every contour and crease, it wasn't so much 'camel toe' as totally graphic.

I'm very used to seeing naked strangers as I do a lot of life drawing but it seemed so extreme and in public, hardly be surprised if she was on the receiving end of all sorts of unwanted attention, I felt like she forced herself on us in fact and it seemed a bit grubby and violating to us. But I was thinking well... how brave! really...

CoffeeCantata · 26/10/2023 15:50

I wish you'd enabled voting, OP!

Yes, yes, a million times yes - they are absolutely repulsive and if they weren't so vile, they'd be hilarious. It's not just the look - it's the thought of where that seam goes and what it does.

BrimfulOfMash · 26/10/2023 16:03

I have just returned from the Gym and an exercise class in Brixton, territory of the hip and cool of S London, and can report that not one person was wearing these travesties of taste. I have never seen anyone in that gym wearing them.

A few young women wearing them round the streets in my less fashionable area.

superplumb · 26/10/2023 16:05

Cat anus leggings

duchiebun · 26/10/2023 16:07

I have just returned from the Gym and an exercise class in Brixton, territory of the hip and cool of S London, and can report that not one person was wearing these travesties of taste. I have never seen anyone in that gym wearing them.

i don’t think they are that popular in S London. The “fashion girls” don’t wear them.

Zebedee55 · 26/10/2023 16:09

Bleugh. Suitable only for attention seekers and sex workers..😗

Swipe left for the next trending thread