Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How bothered are you about Small Boats?

1000 replies

Spinet · 14/09/2023 11:19

I think the idea that people think Small Boats with illegal immigrants on them is a really pressing issue is made up by politicians to have something to campaign on. Am I right? Is this a pressing issue as far as you're concerned?

I'm not really talking about immigration/ asylum seekers in general, just the small boats everyone keeps mentioning. If you're worried about people dying in the channel I get that, but do you think people finding their way here illegally is a major issue for our country at the moment?

I think it's clear I don't but I will accept I'm wrong about this being a made up issue if the majority disagree with me.

If you want to vote YABU= this is one of my top ten concerns. YANBU = I don't think it's a top ten issue for the country.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
ZadocPDederick · 14/09/2023 15:25

Hoistupthemainsail · 14/09/2023 11:41

It's a concern for me because I don't want people profiteering from putting peoples lives at risk. They should be stopped and out of business. Low life.

I fully agree with that, but it's very clear indeed that the government's constant "Stop the Boats" mantra is doing fuck all to achieve it, and it can't.

What would work overnight would be the provision of arrangements for processing asylum claims in France and safe passage with efficient asylum processing here. Who is going to choose a dangerous boat if they can perfectly legally book a place on a ferry or plane?

For all the government whinges about expense, it could have dealt with this much better over the last 13 years by taking steps to set up an efficient asylum processing system. That way, genuine refugees can have leave to stay and can move into employment and their own accommodation - goodness knows we need more people in so many industries. And non-genuine refugees can be identified quickly and deported to their country of origin. It's an easy win but it's a step that Tories won't take because they think their more rabid supporters won't like it.

EasternStandard · 14/09/2023 15:25

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:19

That may be the case @jgw1 but I assume those empty homes also have owners. They aren't just empty unclaimed homes for the taking so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

I think they’re pro state requisition of property

It comes up a lot so I’d predict they’ve offered up their own already

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:25

Bumpitybumper · 14/09/2023 15:21

Rishi Sunak was born in Southampton....

OP has suggested that economic migrants should be treated the same as refugees as they are all human. There is absolutely nothing wrong with economic migration as long as legal channels are used and applicants follow the rules in place.

@Bumpitybumper can people born in Southampton not be economic migrants?

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:26

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:24

Its a policy decision by the UK government to allow the situation.

What is a policy decision? To allow people to legitimately own homes that are empty some of the time?

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:27

ZadocPDederick · 14/09/2023 15:25

I fully agree with that, but it's very clear indeed that the government's constant "Stop the Boats" mantra is doing fuck all to achieve it, and it can't.

What would work overnight would be the provision of arrangements for processing asylum claims in France and safe passage with efficient asylum processing here. Who is going to choose a dangerous boat if they can perfectly legally book a place on a ferry or plane?

For all the government whinges about expense, it could have dealt with this much better over the last 13 years by taking steps to set up an efficient asylum processing system. That way, genuine refugees can have leave to stay and can move into employment and their own accommodation - goodness knows we need more people in so many industries. And non-genuine refugees can be identified quickly and deported to their country of origin. It's an easy win but it's a step that Tories won't take because they think their more rabid supporters won't like it.

It had been locked in court action for the last ten years!!! It’s not as easy as you pretend to make it sound.

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:28

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:26

What is a policy decision? To allow people to legitimately own homes that are empty some of the time?

To allow people to be so greedy that they have one or more empty homes whilst others don't have a roof over their heads.

I for one would rather not live in a country where success is measured by how greedy you are.

Hillary17 · 14/09/2023 15:28

Not really. I’d rather people had safe routes for asylum and immigration. I don’t like the idea of any human being forced to stay in an unsafe situation, particularly those that already have family here. I would however want a government who looked into safe routes and not this weird obsession with allowing people to die at sea because they’ve made a desperate choice.

It’s not an easy answer. But as someone who’s lived in another country, and been a resident of that country - I can’t tell you how bloody difficult our system is.

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:29

WTAF

'compulsory purchase rules' of empty homes.

Just when you thought Labour couldn't make themselves any less appealing.

What's next counting how many bedrooms someone has and deciding if they have to either sell up or house a stranger 😳

Quercus30 · 14/09/2023 15:29

Starmer is not in power.

ZadocPDederick · 14/09/2023 15:29

SueVineer · 14/09/2023 12:05

That’s not true. What’s the point of making stuff up?

Are you seriously contending that it isn't true that Sunak is writing off billions lost on fraudulent PPE contracts?

IClaudine · 14/09/2023 15:30

"He told delegates: “While thousands struggle to get on the housing ladder, there are empty and derelict houses blighting our neighbourhoods – there are 27,000 long-term empty homes"

  1. This is Scottish Labour so will apply only in Scotland.
  2. Will not affect "granny in respite care"
  3. Long term empty homes, not homes empty "for any reason"

Seems like a good idea to me.

SurelyBassey · 14/09/2023 15:31

I live in Kent too and it's a problem
You don't see as many boats on the beach because they are picked up mid channel by the authorities and life boats. So in that respect its being controlled better than the shit show it was before People are getting fed up and good will is disappearing imo

Clavinova · 14/09/2023 15:32

jgw1
you are aware I am sure that there are more than enough empty homes in the UK to house all those who were born in Britain and find themselves without a home to live in

There were over 700,000 'empty homes' in the UK in 2008 - why didn't Labour utilise these homes during their time in government?

pollo8 · 14/09/2023 15:32

Ddimynswr · 14/09/2023 15:07

It's all a carefully planned distraction technique by the government and their puppets in the right wing press.

Let's get the public all annoyed about the boats and immigration so they're not talking about our incompetence. We can then position ourselves as hardliners on immigration in time for the next election to win more votes and people will overlook our catastrophic failures elsewhere...because they're so annoyed about the boats and see it as a major issue.

Anyone who can't see this is just playing into their hands.

Judging by some comments on this thread, their plan is working well.

Edited

Completely agree. It's all way more political than it looks.

I think the government could quite easily stop the boats now – but the timing isn't right for them. Better to let it carry on for now, for two reasons: first, because it's a great distraction, and second, because the idea is probably to get the country entirely whipped up by it, with a solution magically found just before the 2024 election.

I think that a lot of things could be fixed right now, but it's strategically smarter for the Tories to allow things to get really shit – and allow Labour to make all sorts of promises that will upset the more right-learning vote.

Of course, maybe I'm totally wrong and the Tories are strategically incompetent as well as being useless bastards.

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:33

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:29

WTAF

'compulsory purchase rules' of empty homes.

Just when you thought Labour couldn't make themselves any less appealing.

What's next counting how many bedrooms someone has and deciding if they have to either sell up or house a stranger 😳

Yes it smacks of fascism.
Second homes also
Bedroom tax
car tax - where people are charged by the mile and ULEZ all over the country.

I think when it dawns on people what Labour are planning to do they are going to be horrified.

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:33

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:29

WTAF

'compulsory purchase rules' of empty homes.

Just when you thought Labour couldn't make themselves any less appealing.

What's next counting how many bedrooms someone has and deciding if they have to either sell up or house a stranger 😳

@BloodyHellKen you would rather see homes sit empty, whilst other people do not have a home to live in?

Jeevesnotwooster · 14/09/2023 15:33

Only in that people are dying on them. Give them ferry tickets.

BloodyHellKen · 14/09/2023 15:33

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:28

To allow people to be so greedy that they have one or more empty homes whilst others don't have a roof over their heads.

I for one would rather not live in a country where success is measured by how greedy you are.

Ah I see, you imagine if all empty second homes forced into the rental market then everyone would be living in a utopia 😂

jgw1 · 14/09/2023 15:34

Clavinova · 14/09/2023 15:32

jgw1
you are aware I am sure that there are more than enough empty homes in the UK to house all those who were born in Britain and find themselves without a home to live in

There were over 700,000 'empty homes' in the UK in 2008 - why didn't Labour utilise these homes during their time in government?

@Clavinova I suggest you write to Gordon Brown and ask him, do let us know the answer.

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:35

This is not a cuddly Blair type party.
Labour are now entrenched and indebted to just stop the oil activists, trans activists and eco warriors, the hard left and the unions we are in real trouble if they get in.

IClaudine · 14/09/2023 15:36

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:33

Yes it smacks of fascism.
Second homes also
Bedroom tax
car tax - where people are charged by the mile and ULEZ all over the country.

I think when it dawns on people what Labour are planning to do they are going to be horrified.

You are talking bollocks though. There is no UK wide Labour policy to compulsory purchase all empty homes.

There is a policy proposal in Scotland to do so for long term empty homes that are being left to rot.

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:36

Jeevesnotwooster · 14/09/2023 15:33

Only in that people are dying on them. Give them ferry tickets.

Why not offer the ferry tickets for free whilst we are at it?

ilovesooty · 14/09/2023 15:37

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:35

This is not a cuddly Blair type party.
Labour are now entrenched and indebted to just stop the oil activists, trans activists and eco warriors, the hard left and the unions we are in real trouble if they get in.

Are you going to tell us about the eye watering woke agenda then?

Lastchancechica · 14/09/2023 15:37

IClaudine · 14/09/2023 15:36

You are talking bollocks though. There is no UK wide Labour policy to compulsory purchase all empty homes.

There is a policy proposal in Scotland to do so for long term empty homes that are being left to rot.

That is utter rubbish. That is exactly what Labour are looking at.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread