Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cyclists who act like they own the road should pay towards it

744 replies

dreamingofsun · 10/08/2023 10:18

So cyclists get priority on the roads, and are happy to ride two abreast so they hold all the car traffic up. Shouldnt they at least pay towards the upkeep of the road?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
NewPapaGuinea · 14/08/2023 21:52

EldenRing4 · 14/08/2023 13:01

0.8 seconds? When you're behind a cyclist on national speed limit roads for more than a mile? Give over.

What I don't understand is... cars can be pulled over and FINED for driving too slowly.
https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/motors/can-you-fined-driving-slow-24265651
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/uk-news/drivers-warned-lesser-known-rule-27515187

Ergo, something going too slowly is a hazard.

How does it being a bicycle as opposed to a car magically make it not a hazard?
Seeing as you have to treat the former as the latter now by giving the same amount of room to overtake.

It’s not just something going slowly, it’s something going unexpectedly slow. You see a cyclist, horse
rider or tractor you expect it to be going slower and act accordingly. Unless you’re the type of driver who blasts past horse riders?

WellPlaced · 15/08/2023 04:52

I wouldn’t take my notice of Cambridgeshire Live tbh.

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 07:08

TeresaCrowd · 14/08/2023 16:31

Question for the helmet, hi viz and insurance brigade... I wear a helmet, I have fully comp insurance for my bikes which includes 3rd party liabilty as well as theft and accidental damage cover to my own bikes, I'm a member of British Cycling and a trained ride leader and every single one of my jerseys and shorts have reflective detailing on. All my bad weather gear is fluo pink, my helmet is fluo pink, my shoes are fluo pink (moving parts of a cyclist are often more visible than static parts so shoes are worthwhile being bright.) and I drive a car on which I pay 'for the roads' (whihc is bullshit but if that's your strawman argument then i'm paying the same tax as the drivers who don't cycle. I can count on one hand the number of traffic lights that feature on my regular routes, and all of them are on very big busy junctions where running them to go straight on would be absolutely suicidal so I don't.

Why do I still get close passed, stuff thrown at me, abuse out of the window etc? What do you want me to do because it seems it's actually just 'not be there', so why waste your time with the helmet/insurance/hi-viz diatribe when complying with it makes fuck all difference to how you are treated, and just reveal your true selfish colours.

Because you're chosing to deliberately obstruct other people. Your bicycle is painfully slow compared to a car. And the majority of people who use the roads are in vehicles. So you inconvenience them.

Why don't you drive or take a bus?

DatumTarum · 15/08/2023 07:31

@onefinemess

You're delayed for a few seconds,

You're not "obstructed".

DdraigGoch · 15/08/2023 07:46

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 07:08

Because you're chosing to deliberately obstruct other people. Your bicycle is painfully slow compared to a car. And the majority of people who use the roads are in vehicles. So you inconvenience them.

Why don't you drive or take a bus?

In order to drive I'd have to spend thousands purchasing, insuring, fueling and maintaining a car. I'd also have to find somewhere to park it, both at home and near work - in both cases depriving someone else of a convenient space as things are tight around here, sometimes I'd get home from work and have to park at the other end of my village. There's quite an environmental impact to all this.

If I got the bus to/from work I'd have finished my shift at 1:30am and had to sit around for four hours before taking the first train and then a connecting bus home. Needless to say that after 16 hours out of the house by that point the cat wouldn't have been impressed with me when I got back, and I'd be a zombie.

Much more convenient to spend just a few hundred on a bicycle that requires little in the way of maintenance and is fueled by bacon sandwiches. I can come and go as I please, parking it securely in the porch.

Still not your turn with the family brain cell this week?

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 07:57

DatumTarum · 15/08/2023 07:31

@onefinemess

You're delayed for a few seconds,

You're not "obstructed".

Depends on the circumstances. I've been delayed by selfish cyclists who are dawdling along at 10mph and can't be overtaken.

So you're wrong. Cyclists cause unnecessary delays to other people. It's selfish, entitled behaviour.

Ginmonkeyagain · 15/08/2023 07:58

For the last time motorists do not own public roads. In fact apart from motorways, other users have more of a right to use the roads.

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 07:59

DdraigGoch · 15/08/2023 07:46

In order to drive I'd have to spend thousands purchasing, insuring, fueling and maintaining a car. I'd also have to find somewhere to park it, both at home and near work - in both cases depriving someone else of a convenient space as things are tight around here, sometimes I'd get home from work and have to park at the other end of my village. There's quite an environmental impact to all this.

If I got the bus to/from work I'd have finished my shift at 1:30am and had to sit around for four hours before taking the first train and then a connecting bus home. Needless to say that after 16 hours out of the house by that point the cat wouldn't have been impressed with me when I got back, and I'd be a zombie.

Much more convenient to spend just a few hundred on a bicycle that requires little in the way of maintenance and is fueled by bacon sandwiches. I can come and go as I please, parking it securely in the porch.

Still not your turn with the family brain cell this week?

Why resort to insults?

Bicycles are slow, their presence on the road obstructs other vehicles. You can't deny that cars get stuck behind Bicycles.

What I'm saying is correct.

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 08:02

Ginmonkeyagain · 15/08/2023 07:58

For the last time motorists do not own public roads. In fact apart from motorways, other users have more of a right to use the roads.

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Cyclists cause delays, and that's a selfish thing to do to other people when there's no need to cycle anywhere. You could just as easily take a bus or taxi, you're closing to use an outdated mode of transport which causes delays and inconvenience to others.

TeresaCrowd · 15/08/2023 08:03

@onefinemess for the hard of reading (aka you) I own, insure and drive a car. It’s also not always the most efficient to get to where you want to go, and driving it does not keep you fit which helps considerably with my medical conditions. I am regularly slowed down by cars whilst on my bike and even more regularly by lorries overtaking lorries, than I am when I have to pass a cyclist.

Badbadbunny · 15/08/2023 08:04

A journey I do occasionally is in Yorkshire on a main A road which has a steep/winding bit for a few miles. double whites in the middle of the road so you can't overtake. You're stuck behind bikes for about 5-10 minutes going at around 5 mph, as it's steep uphill and can't pass due to the white lines (and traffic coming the other way of course). Will the sods stop to let the couple of miles of traffic queue they're causing, go past them, no they won't. About half way up, there's a lay-by. Every single time there's a slow moving tanker going up (they usually manage around 15 mph) they'll stop in the lay by to let the queue of traffic go past. Yet the cyclists never do!

Ginmonkeyagain · 15/08/2023 08:05

If we want to talk about inconvenience how about the inconvenience cars cause pedestrians?

WellPlaced · 15/08/2023 08:12

@onefinemess

I’m a cyclist who gets stuck behind cars. Cars that are moving slowly and stuck in traffic jams and then park up blocking the carriageway when not in use.

Have you considered that you’re the selfish one? I also suspect you drive and don’t take the bus

Badbadbunny · 15/08/2023 08:12

Cycle lanes DO cause more congestion if they're badly planned/installed!

One particular busy junction in particular used to be two lanes - one for straight on/turning right, the other for turning left. Never any significant congestion/queueing in either direction. It worked well.

They removed the left lane by hash-marking it and white-lined a cycle lane instead. So now all traffic has to use what was previously the right hand lane, for going straight ahead, turning right or turning left. Of course, now it's backed up constantly as the cars turning left have to wait for cars turning right, which in turn have to wait for cars coming in the other direction to clear, so it basically holds everyone up! I've seen queues as long as a mile back, which in turn cause congestion at other junctions along it!

What's even more stupid is that there is no cycle lane before or after that junction, so bikes are in normal traffic flow, then they have about 50 feet of their own cycle lane which causes the chaos, then after the junction, they're back in normal traffic flow. Surely it's more dangerous for them to have to cycle alongside a long queue of traffic, weaving in and out, having to watch for pedestrians/traffic turning through the queue of traffic in their path, etc?

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 08:12

TeresaCrowd · 15/08/2023 08:03

@onefinemess for the hard of reading (aka you) I own, insure and drive a car. It’s also not always the most efficient to get to where you want to go, and driving it does not keep you fit which helps considerably with my medical conditions. I am regularly slowed down by cars whilst on my bike and even more regularly by lorries overtaking lorries, than I am when I have to pass a cyclist.

And?

Your bicycle delays the majority of road users. That's a fact, not a judgment.

Maybe you are OK with causing delays to others, I just think it's selfish.

BreehyHinnyBrinnyHoohyHah · 15/08/2023 08:13

From the Highway Code, in Rules for Cyclists:

"on quiet roads or streets – if a faster vehicle comes up behind you, move to the left to enable them to overtake, if you can do so safely"

Funny how so many cyclists bleat on about motorists following the Highway Code, but then always ignore that nugget.

DdraigGoch · 15/08/2023 08:14

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 07:59

Why resort to insults?

Bicycles are slow, their presence on the road obstructs other vehicles. You can't deny that cars get stuck behind Bicycles.

What I'm saying is correct.

Do I get to complain about the cars I get stuck behind?

The sooner we move to car-free living, the better our society will be.

kelsaycobbles · 15/08/2023 08:15

If you have ever ridden a bike uphill you will know why they don't stop to let you past- getting started again is almost impossible

If cyclists paid for anything it should be proper cycling infrastructure

Just back from Germany - it's eye opening how cycle friendly it is with its wide separate tracks that go everywhere, underpasses to help at busy junctions

Ginmonkeyagain · 15/08/2023 08:15

You know what causes most delays? Congestion, that is too many cars. You aren't stuck in traffic, you are traffic. Most of the issues car drivers have are caused by other car drivers.

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 08:16

Badbadbunny · 15/08/2023 08:04

A journey I do occasionally is in Yorkshire on a main A road which has a steep/winding bit for a few miles. double whites in the middle of the road so you can't overtake. You're stuck behind bikes for about 5-10 minutes going at around 5 mph, as it's steep uphill and can't pass due to the white lines (and traffic coming the other way of course). Will the sods stop to let the couple of miles of traffic queue they're causing, go past them, no they won't. About half way up, there's a lay-by. Every single time there's a slow moving tanker going up (they usually manage around 15 mph) they'll stop in the lay by to let the queue of traffic go past. Yet the cyclists never do!

Exactly.

Entitled cyclists with huge egos. And they wonder why people don't like them.

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 08:16

BreehyHinnyBrinnyHoohyHah · 15/08/2023 08:13

From the Highway Code, in Rules for Cyclists:

"on quiet roads or streets – if a faster vehicle comes up behind you, move to the left to enable them to overtake, if you can do so safely"

Funny how so many cyclists bleat on about motorists following the Highway Code, but then always ignore that nugget.

This.

WellPlaced · 15/08/2023 08:17

BreehyHinnyBrinnyHoohyHah · 15/08/2023 08:13

From the Highway Code, in Rules for Cyclists:

"on quiet roads or streets – if a faster vehicle comes up behind you, move to the left to enable them to overtake, if you can do so safely"

Funny how so many cyclists bleat on about motorists following the Highway Code, but then always ignore that nugget.

Of course, motorists never moan about cyclists and the Highway Code do they? 🤔

DdraigGoch · 15/08/2023 08:17

onefinemess · 15/08/2023 08:12

And?

Your bicycle delays the majority of road users. That's a fact, not a judgment.

Maybe you are OK with causing delays to others, I just think it's selfish.

Your car spews out particulate emissions (even if electric, tyre rubber can be nasty) that shortens the lives of the majority of road users. That's a fact.

Maybe you are OK with causing death to others, I just think that it's selfish.

kelsaycobbles · 15/08/2023 08:17

Ok
Cyclist bashing because you can't go as fast as you want !

Let's bash the car driver who kills the planet with their emissions , causes asthma and dementia deaths with their fumes , and leads to their own rising obesity

And all that causes my taxes to have to pay for all the health problems car drivers cause

DatumTarum · 15/08/2023 08:18

"If you can do so safely"

I'm not facilitating a dangerous, illegal close pass.