@Soontobe60
Why are you questioning the repost of a doctor?
It’s not a medical report, it was a hospital summary sheet which can be completed by HCPs that are not doctors so there is no surety that the notes on the summary sheet being quoted by the tribunal were written by a doctor. The fact it’s not being quoted as “primary diagnosis” but “impression” and there is no name of a diagnosing doctor being attributed for “superficial burn” both indicate imho that it was likely not the diagnosis of a doctor.
My point is that there was no further report of a worst burn than was initially reported. Are you saying the other person who examined the child is also wrong? Normally a return visit to check for infection and change dressing would not be done by a doctor, but one of the physician associate or nursing staff. They are not going to go beyond checking that it is healing satisfactorily.
Whilst we’re at it, have you wondered how a Y6 child who’s mother lets him walk home from school alone managed to get a burn on the back of his hand through using a glue gun? The only way that he got that burn was by purposely putting it on his own skin.
That isn’t the only way. They have a built in stand that flips down which if not set down carefully, can cause the glue gun to fall over onto a hand. The metal nozzle piece also gets very hot and a child who hasn’t been shown how to use one (as was the case with this child) can easily make the error of thinking only the glue coming out is hot, not the nozzle itself. If children are working as partners, it is also common for one child to accidentally burn the other child’s hand if one is using the glue gun and the other child holding together what they are gluing.