My daughter 4 is very confident a natural born leader, spirited and more of a doer than a thinker - her nursery staff put it politely don't like her as much as others because they most likely are not trained to deal with children who are intellectually and physically ahead of their years.
That's highly, highly unlikely.
We encounter a range of personalities, abilities, and temperaments. We are also trained in teaching across the range of abilities.
The idea that staff don't like children because they're talented is codswallop.
Staff might not find certain behaviours endearing but that has nothing to do with being intelligence and innate leadership qualities.
Child A can have a wonderful gift of including their peers, driving games and play, generating ideas, and coordinating projects. They are friendly and tend to attract other children to them because they're kind, charismatic, listen to others, are respectful and others seem to want to follow their lead because of this.
Child B can be bossy, domineering, and doesn't let other children get a word in edgeways. This child tends to appoint themselves as the child in charge rather than their peers being drawn to them. They tend to be heard dictating lots to other children and often think everything has to be done their way or the high way.
Child A is probably closer to being a natural leader.
Child B is bossy and could probably become a good leader if they're given appropriate guidance. If they're not given appropriate guidance then their behaviour is likely to cause them issues.